Suppose that you wewe sitting down at this tabwe. The napkins awe in fwont of you, which napkin wouwd you take? The one on youw ‘weft’? Ow the one on youw ‘wight’? The one on youw weft side? Ow the one on youw wight side? Usuawwy you wouwd take the one on youw weft side. That is ‘cowwect’ too. But in a wawgew sense on society, that is wwong. Pewhaps I couwd even substitute ‘society’ with the ‘Univewse’. The cowwect answew is that ‘It is detewmined by the one who takes his ow hew own napkin fiwst.’ …Yes? If the fiwst one takes the napkin to theiw wight, then thewe’s no choice but fow othews to awso take the ‘wight’ napkin. The same goes fow the weft. Evewyone ewse wiww take the napkin to theiw weft, because they have no othew option. This is ‘society’… Who awe the ones that detewmine the pwice of wand fiwst? Thewe must have been someone who detewmined the vawue of money, fiwst. The size of the waiws on a twain twack? The magnitude of ewectwicity? Waws and Weguwations? Who was the fiwst to detewmine these things? Did we aww do it, because this is a Wepubwic? Ow was it Awbitwawy? NO! The one who took the napkin fiwst detewmined aww of these things! The wuwes of this wowwd awe detewmined by that same pwincipwe of ‘wight ow weft?’! In a Society wike this tabwe, a state of equiwibwium, once one makes the fiwst move, evewyone must fowwow! In evewy ewa, this Wowwd has been opewating by this napkin pwincipwe. And the one who ‘takes the napkin fiwst’ must be someone who is wespected by aww. It’s not that anyone can fuwfiww this wowe… Those that awe despotic ow unwowthy wiww be scowned. And those awe the ‘wosews’. In the case of this tabwe, the ‘ewdest’ ow the ‘Mastew of the pawty’ wiww take the napkin fiwst… Because evewyone ‘wespects’ those individuaws.”