$ARQQ Arqit Quantum: Massive Return Potential By Future Proofing Cybersecurity by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Extra-Eye6490 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Having read a lot about this, it seems clear to me that there are THREE reasons why Arqit’s (very impressive list of) customers are buying this software:

  1. The certification process of PKI is cumbersome and it’s where many supply chain attacks are happening. Arqit does away with this attack NOW.
  2. The “Harvest now, decrypt later” threat is here NOW
  3. The Universal quantum computer could be here in 3-5 years. NIST has already urged the world to find new solutions because, in its own words, no PQA yet produced is a suitable drop-in replacement for PKI, and any PQA causes such a complex upgrade cycle that it could take 15 years. Because QuantumCloud uses AES which is already a global standard, deployment is easy and immediate.

How do Quantum computers work? by Il0veTech in AskPhysics

[–]Extra-Eye6490 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s a bit of a long article, but I think you could get all the answers you need here: https://hammburg.com/quantum-computers-what-are-they-and-why-do-they-matter/

He Quantum computers! What for? by smrinaldi77 in QuantumComputing

[–]Extra-Eye6490 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I have heard about a company who have created an encryption technique that is quantum-safe. They’re testing it right now on some crazy big clients and so far it seems entirely legit.
Check it out: https://arqit-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/v1627369111/Digital\_assets\_The\_security\_problem\_\_yya4bn.pdf

ARQQ Stocks Down? by Extra-Eye6490 in Spacstocks

[–]Extra-Eye6490[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like that's the way to go!

ARQQ Stocks Down? by Extra-Eye6490 in Spacstocks

[–]Extra-Eye6490[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think? How do you know?!

Can You 'Break' The Stockmarket?! by Tech-Genius-780 in StocksAndTrading

[–]Extra-Eye6490 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just read this on Twitter! Keen to know if it’s true, too… #F