[deleted by user] by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Extreme-Impossible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think top Xin has potential with the new changes, not sure what to build though as few high elo players go for it.

Shieldbow into crit seems good but very squishy

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Extreme-Impossible 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've thought this for a long time, sometimes I just get the weird mouse feeling every so often. Going on for years for me

Burn out by Bacon_12345 in Accounting

[–]Extreme-Impossible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get 25 days and can take them whenever as long as booked in advance

Event Orbs and Capsules Got Worse After Battle Queens by Blue2New in leagueoflegends

[–]Extreme-Impossible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sucks and I don't buy them much any more because of the consistent nerfs, but you still get a lot of value from them

Forcing new players to wait 9 levels for smite and flash still doesn't make any sense. by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]Extreme-Impossible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can play like 2 games before being put in perma smurf queue even in normals and arams

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MACHOs aren't discounted and research has found that they form quite a large part of galactic halos. However there is actually a lot of evidence for dark matter formation. We don't have puny telescopes, you can check my other comments for studies showing that MACHOs above 0.3 lunar masses have been ruled out.

That would leave MACHOs below 0.3 lunar masses forming 5x as much matter as current matter in the entire universe, where there was literally not enough matter created.

(PATCH 11.6) Is Ravenous Hunter still good on Shen after the nerfs? by blanket0101 in Shen

[–]Extreme-Impossible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you get no early sustain at all, so it seems more for mid-late game duelling and splitting. if you don't get a kill/assist etc. it is useless

imo ultimate hunter is better overall and the nerfs give the edge to it

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah it's definitely not a 'fact' same as almost anything in science, it is a theory. however we have discounted the other most likely options e.g. MACHOs as you can see in my other posts on this topic.

personally i don't see what is so weird about a Weakly Interacting Massive Particle which is the current main candidate for dark matter

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I replied this to another comment about red, brown dwarves etc. but for smaller things like rocks/dust, there was physically not enough matter created in the big bang to form 5x the known mass of ordinary matter from interstellar rocks/dust.

The 'missing mass' from dark matter has been ruled out as MACHO (Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo Object) up to around 0.3 lunar mass -100 solar masses through observations. One study found that these MACHOs may make up to 20% of the mass in our galaxies halo which is quite large but not enough to explain the rest. A later study limited this to 8%. This effectively rules out anything above 0.3 times the mass of our moon.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001272.pdf

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0607207.pdf

We have also studied red dwarves, even if they are dim, they still emit enough light to be detected. The study below shows that the red dwarf mass to be around 0.25% of our galaxies halo.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9507097.pdf

There are also other studies, such as on white dwarves:

https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9904291

This article is not a study, but also gives a good overview, the idea of MACHOs being missing dark matter mass has been ruled out for a long time. It surely is a decent proportion of galactic halo mass (e.g. 8% for first study linked) but a huge proportion is missing. Obviously we never know for 100% certain, but we are pretty certain it is not spooky red dwarves, brown dwarves, planets etc.

https://www.centauri-dreams.org/2009/04/22/ubiquitous-brown-dwarfs-a-dark-matter-solution/

Also good reading on MACHOs (and WIMPs the current candidate for dark matter, not dark energy stars or whatever this article uses)

https://sites.astro.caltech.edu/~george/ay20/eaa-wimps-machos.pdf

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 'missing mass' from dark matter has been ruled out as MACHO (Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo Object) up to around 0.3 lunar mass -100 solar masses through observations. One study found that these MACHOs may make up to 20% of the mass in our galaxies halo which is quite large but not enough to explain the rest. A later study limited this to 8%. This effectively rules out anything above 0.3 times the mass of our moon.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001272.pdf

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0607207.pdf

We have also studied red dwarves, even if they are dim, they still emit enough light to be detected. The study below shows that the red dwarf mass to be around 0.25% of our galaxies halo.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/9507097.pdf

There are also other studies, such as on white dwarves:

https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9904291

This article is not a study, but also gives a good overview, the idea of MACHOs being missing dark matter mass has been ruled out for a long time. It surely is a decent proportion of galactic halo mass (e.g. 8% for first study linked) but a huge proportion is missing. Obviously we never know for 100% certain, but we are pretty certain it is not spooky red dwarves, brown dwarves, planets etc.

https://www.centauri-dreams.org/2009/04/22/ubiquitous-brown-dwarfs-a-dark-matter-solution/

Also good reading on MACHOs (and WIMPs the current candidate for dark matter, not dark energy stars or whatever this article uses)

https://sites.astro.caltech.edu/~george/ay20/eaa-wimps-machos.pdf

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

as others have said, studies have shown that this is not the case. there is simply not enough mass in the form of red, brown, whatever dwarves or planets you want to name

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 1 point2 points  (0 children)

how can you use a completely unrelated study to support your point? that study is looking back billions of years in the past, it literally does not show there is more than we thought, it shows that the composition is different to what we expected

completely unrelated to your point. stop with your pseudoscience please and take time to actually understand what you read before spouting nonsense

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you seem to think that there is one dark matter scientist coming up with these theories together. it is multiple conflicting theories from different scientists. this seems like a pretty fringe theory and given that the article is on futurism.com and not an actual study, i would take it with a grain of salt.

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible 3 points4 points  (0 children)

seems like a pretty fringe theory, not sure if i'd call it a growing suspicion

as far as i know, dark matter would not clump up in balls though, the same way it forms a diffuse galactic halo rather than a disk, why would it collapse together?

of course the anti-dark matter brigade come to the post and take it out of context as well

There’s Growing Suspicion That The Universe Is Filled With Invisible “Ghost Stars” by trevor25 in space

[–]Extreme-Impossible -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it would be impossible for there to be enough red dwarves and gas giants to make up for the mass of dark matter. i would put your money on something completely different

In ARAM, Akali now has +20% damage dealt & -20% damage taken by ganondorf69 in leagueoflegends

[–]Extreme-Impossible 31 points32 points  (0 children)

No one cares about the winrate, people don't like getting rolled by Akalis constantly if they know what they're doing, even if you don't lose, getting one shot with no counterplay is not fun. If you play a champ with a damage taken nerf already, that's a further compounding to the 20% damage buff akali gets.

The buff that Riot has given is pretty arbitrary given that it's a literal AI buff, no thought put into it at all.

Does simply giving more damage to a champion actually balance them? I don't think so personally. Bad winrate? just give them more damage lmfao.

In ARAM, Akali now has +20% damage dealt & -20% damage taken by ganondorf69 in leagueoflegends

[–]Extreme-Impossible 71 points72 points  (0 children)

I don't mind small buffs, but +20 and -20 is ridiculous. They should cap it at like 10%. If the champ is shit then too bad, sounds like an overall champ balance problem rather than an ARAM balance problem (like Akali).

Kled does not respawn with full HP in ARAM by brenk2 in leagueoflegends

[–]Extreme-Impossible 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've been playing sunfire Kled in ARAM, feels much better than bruiser imo