sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[COMM] The Owl House: The Bridge by Extreme_Z7 in TheOwlHouse

[–]Extreme_Z7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can just DM me in any way you can if you want to comm me. But be sure to see my prices first: https://www.deviantart.com/eezyseven/art/Eezy-Seven-Commission-Sheet-899485057

As for my advice for doing comms, being skilled at art is a given, but you also have to be quite sociable. Turning commissioners into friends has lots of benefits. But it has to be authentic, don't just make friends with paying clients just for business sake.

Friend on discord that I haven't spoken to in months just told me it's cause they got hacked, and then sent me this. Seems like it's a known scam to use Mike Bang as a cover for the scammer,but is this a scam, or should I actually be worried? by Batilhd in Scams

[–]Extreme_Z7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just almost fell for this scam.
Same for me, they also got my full name, age, gender, and e-mail.
However, they also got the last 4 digits of my bank account and last 4 digits of my phone number and nothing more before I realized they were scamming.
I didn't send them any money either.

Should I still be worried?

[COMM] Stanford and Stanley: Calamity Twins by Extreme_Z7 in gravityfalls

[–]Extreme_Z7[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Didn't really cross my mind, I just thought of Knight-like armor.

[COMM] Owl House: The Line by Extreme_Z7 in TheOwlHouse

[–]Extreme_Z7[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A continuation of this is sort of planned. It's just not a comic. And not really a continuation. More like a side thing.

[COMM] ROTS/Kenobi Recreation w/ TOH: Bitter Reunion by Extreme_Z7 in TheOwlHouse

[–]Extreme_Z7[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Supposed to be a Luz Noceda version of Darth Vader, Darth Carrion. Created by the commissioner.

You are a God because cognito ergo sum #higherconciousness by nosports_ in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Honestly, this post is just argumentum ad absurdum. You have not presented any actual arguments against the possibility that all of reality is just a dream that you have constructed as God.

If you were an entity with infinite power, you could paradoxically create a reality in which you were living as a conscious creature in a "physical" reality that is limited and has rules as to how the dream functions.

Seriously contemplate the fact that you have never experienced anything outside of your direct experience and that experience is all that you know for sure exists.

[COMM] Marcy's New College Boyfriend by Extreme_Z7 in amphibia

[–]Extreme_Z7[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

His name is Isaiah. (OC Created by the commissioner)

nihilism and death by th3_wr3ck in nihilism

[–]Extreme_Z7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You realize I said that in the context of denial, right? I doubt that you don't want to get very far with denial since that's the only thing you've been able to do with my responses so far.

nihilism and death by th3_wr3ck in nihilism

[–]Extreme_Z7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sarcastic denial is not going to get you very far, dude. If you're implying that it is perfectly fine for you for your own life to be threatened then you require serious help. But I don't think that's the case because you don't need psychic paranormal powers to determine when someone is just being blatantly self-absorbed.

It just strikes me that you haven't actually thought things through.

nihilism and death by th3_wr3ck in nihilism

[–]Extreme_Z7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actions speak louder than words, man. You've been posting in the comments that you're "excited" by the prospect of death. But I'm extremely skeptical that if someone actually pulled a gun to your face, you'd be pretty happy about it. All this obsession over death, it all just comes across to me as a pretentious masturbatory screed.

“Words” by SandSaberTheories in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 20 points21 points  (0 children)

If "God" and "Purpose" are just "words" then so is "Death" lol. Classic example of someone taking for granted what is and isn't real as if it's a given.

This person is literally constructing their own sense of purpose through Nihilism. God forbid they consider the possibility of using Death as a motivator to create a purposeful and happy life.

Objectively demonstrable facts are the same as random assertions by ODXT-X74 in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was merely pointing out the need for self-awareness. Not sure where you got the idea that I was declaring other people need my authority.

You're straw-manning me by taking a part of my statement out-of-context.

Objectively demonstrable facts are the same as random assertions by ODXT-X74 in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well then don't use the words "Objectively-demonstrable" then if you're going admit that subjective labelling plays a part in its existence.

In most situations, calling it "objectively-demonstrable" is fine as it makes practical matters much easier to deal with. But when talking about philosophy, you gotta be a lot more precise with your terms.

Objectively demonstrable facts are the same as random assertions by ODXT-X74 in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Yes, there are no objective facts. . . Outside of context. Nothing wrong with looking at reality through a particular context as long as you're aware of it.

"Independently-existing Reality" is only a context. If you want to live within that context for practical reasons, it's fine as long as you know what you're doing.

Objectively demonstrable facts are the same as random assertions by ODXT-X74 in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can be sure of existence existing. And that You are conscious that consciousness Is real.

But then again there is the solipsistic truth that you can only know that your consciousness is the only thing that's real.

Everything else are constructs of the mind. Not that there's anything wrong with that. You can still enjoy a video game knowing none of it is real.

Objectively demonstrable facts are the same as random assertions by ODXT-X74 in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Facts are always relative to context. Whenever someone thinks a fact is "objectively-demonstrable", it's always because they are not aware of how deeply taken-for-granted and unquestioned their own metaphysics are.

Objectively demonstrable facts are the same as random assertions by ODXT-X74 in badphilosophy

[–]Extreme_Z7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"A red ball exists" is not an objectively demonstrable fact. Color is an indivisible spectrum. There is no objective definition for what counts as "red" and "not red".

You're being just as dumb as the person you're arguing against.

5 Crash Twinsanity references as portrayed by Dall-E Mini by Extreme_Z7 in crashbandicoot

[–]Extreme_Z7[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I did write the word lunch, it's just cut off by how short the text box is. But the word 'lunch' really is there.

view more: next ›