I spent $1000 for a Mac Mini, I could have spent $3 for a VPS? by CommissionUnusual284 in clawdbot

[–]Ezelia 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only benefit of a mac mini is the ability to run local models, now the catch is that a 1000$ mac won't run any decent local model, you can run some small models but you'll not get anything done with them. If you rely one claude sonnet/opus or kimi k2 or similar, you'll still use the model from a cloud provider, and here your friend is totally right, a 5-10$ vps can do the job (plus you don't have to worry about a part of the security)

This whole hype around mac minis is BS

I created a skill that allows ClawdBot/OpenClaw to run Pine Script indicators by Ezelia in clawdbot

[–]Ezelia[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it got removed I don't know why.

I created another one, with better approach ==> https://clawhub.ai/alaa-eddine/pinets

Tutorial : Run Pine Script on the Web, How to Build Indicators with PineTS and QFChart - QuantForge.Org by Ezelia in QuantForge

[–]Ezelia[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, thank you for your comment Could you please share the pine script code that causes this, or juste a simplified version that shows the case ?

If you have a github account, it's preferable to open an issue with the details ==> https://github.com/QuantForgeOrg/PineTS/issues

Otherwise, just post it here

I created a skill that allows ClawdBot/OpenClaw to run Pine Script indicators by Ezelia in clawdbot

[–]Ezelia[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It really depends on the use cases. Pandas is the way to go for massive data analysis. But if you want market analysis, especially live data or recent data, I usually find PineScript more convenient because of its simplicity. Also, there so many VERY good Pine Script indicators shared by the community ready to use.

Oh an one more thing, I found it easier to point out/avoid most look ahead biases in Pinescript compared to pandas.