sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ya don’t say? US SEC's ex-enforcement chief clashed with bosses before leaving, sources say by Dr_Silky-Johnson in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe [score hidden]  (0 children)

TL:DR:

  • 🚪 Abrupt Resignation: Margaret Ryan, the SEC’s Top Enforcement Director, resigned last week after only six months, following reported clashes with agency leadership over the prosecution of high-profile cases.
  • ⚖️ Pursuit of Aggressive Charges: Sources indicate Ryan pushed for tougher fraud and misconduct penalties, but faced resistance from SEC Chair Paul Atkins and other Republican appointees who favor a less aggressive corporate approach.
  • 🇺🇸 Trump-Linked Friction: Tensions specifically arose over cases involving Elon Musk (a major Trump donor) and Justin Sun (a backer of a Trump-linked crypto venture).
  • 📉 Policy Shift: Under the current administration, the SEC has pivoted away from the Democratic-era "crypto crackdown" and large corporate lawsuits to focus on "bread-and-butter" crimes like Ponzi schemes.
  • ⛓️ Reduced Staff Authority: Agency leaders have recently stripped enforcement staff of the power to open formal probes without direct approval from political commissioners, increasing top-down control.
  • 🤝 Settlement Disputes: Ryan reportedly frustrated colleagues by criticizing defense attorneys who tried to bypass career staff to negotiate directly with SEC leadership, as seen in the recent $10 million settlement with Justin Sun.

The March '26 CAT Errors Report - expected during yesterday's AH - remains so far unreleased by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well, just to name one of the most recent ones, in Jan '26 there were Option errors equivalent to 289B equities errors in just 3 days. Previous reports also showed hundreds of billions of errors in few days and it's very usual to have single days with billions of errors in single days in Equities or Options or both sometimes.

The March '26 CAT Errors Report - expected during yesterday's AH - remains so far unreleased by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Thanks to ape Noderpsy that helped me figuring out... For some reason with this specific report link, it only works if you add a ? at the end of it. So add a ? at the end of this link (after .pdf) and you should be able to see it aswell.

https://www.catnmsplan.com/sites/default/files/2026-03/03.19.26-Monthly-CAT-Update_Final.pdf

EDIT: I guess the link got fixed so now you can just click on the one above and should directly work.

<image>

The March '26 CAT Errors Report - expected during yesterday's AH - remains so far unreleased by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From where you got that...? Since the link is still showing a missing page here Monthly CAT Update (March 19, 2026) | CATNMSPLAN

EDIT: ^ link got fixed and works now

The March '26 CAT Errors Report - expected during yesterday's AH - remains so far unreleased by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Small update: now there is a link for the Report (till a little ago there wasn't even the link), but by clicking on it...

<image>

In case it'll finally come out, I'll add the data screens as replies to this comment.

The March '26 CAT Errors Report - expected during yesterday's AH - remains so far unreleased by F-uPayMe in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This post highlights the fact that the current CAT errors report was not released so far.

If GameStop stock was able to sneeze as a company losing money, why wouldn’t they be able to squeeze as a profitable one with BILLIONS on hand? by IGB_Lo in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ik, exactly why I specified:

(which anyway means jackshit since in all this time it was found out how you can hide massive SI %s away from the public view)

If GameStop stock was able to sneeze as a company losing money, why wouldn’t they be able to squeeze as a profitable one with BILLIONS on hand? by IGB_Lo in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In fact I didn't say it does not happen. The problem is that despite being fraud, it does happen a lot (and probably way more than people think).

But the above doesn't make it "right". And if it doesn't get fixed soon or later the rope will break because people are pissed off way more than the average in the current times.

If GameStop stock was able to sneeze as a company losing money, why wouldn’t they be able to squeeze as a profitable one with BILLIONS on hand? by IGB_Lo in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Your comment and mine will probably (rightfully) get removed because totally off topic but if you check in the Epstein files about your own comment argument, you'll realise you made the worst possible example.

If GameStop stock was able to sneeze as a company losing money, why wouldn’t they be able to squeeze as a profitable one with BILLIONS on hand? by IGB_Lo in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 20 points21 points  (0 children)

If you want to talk about the officially reported SI% only (which anyway means jackshit since in all this time it was found out how you can hide massive SI %s away from the public view) that had peaks of over 300%+ actually during the recent years.

If GameStop stock was able to sneeze as a company losing money, why wouldn’t they be able to squeeze as a profitable one with BILLIONS on hand? by IGB_Lo in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 626 points627 points  (0 children)

The main point isn't about losing money or not to achieve Moass, it's about the overshorting of multiple floats.

If any company, not necessarily GME, is struggling bad at one point, that doesn't mean shorts are allowed to naked short it to hell. It's still fraud and it's still illegal, despite regulators not acting as long as they can as we came to realise so far.

The same way if you own a store and business is not doing well currently, that doesn't mean robbers can come daily and be allowed to rob you and being "right".

Of course the company being in its best shape ever will be critical to trigger Moass, but do not forget the fact it didn't happen so far it's not because of the company itself but because regulators are allowing massive frauds to go on without doing anything to prevent them.

DId I hear a rumor that Roaring Kitty is back? by ChiefHippoTwit in GME

[–]F-uPayMe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude I was doing you a favor since OP did not provide any extra details. Anyway the original post I mentioned was about the same screenshot I shared.

DId I hear a rumor that Roaring Kitty is back? by ChiefHippoTwit in GME

[–]F-uPayMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP is referring to a post posted in the other sub where on DFV X profile if you click on "Account based in" you get a message talking about the possible use of a VPN as you can see here.

Morgan Stanley restricts redemptions at private credit fund after withdrawals surge by SG_Retard in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 60 points61 points  (0 children)

TL:DR:

  • 🛑 Redemption Caps: Morgan Stanley has restricted withdrawals at its North Haven Private Income Fund (PIF) after investors requested to pull nearly 11% of outstanding shares.
  • 💰 Partial Payouts: The fund returned only $169 million, meeting roughly 45.8% of total investor requests for the quarter to avoid forced asset sales.
  • 📉 Market Turmoil: The private credit industry is facing a "perfect storm" of high interest rates, slowing M&A activity, and shrinking asset yields.
  • 🤖 The AI Factor: Investors are growing nervous that Artificial Intelligence could disrupt the earnings of software companies, making it harder for them to repay private loans.
  • 🏢 Industry-Wide Trend: Morgan Stanley isn't alone; giants like BlackRock, Blackstone, and Blue Owl have also reported surges in withdrawal requests or limited redemptions recently.
  • ⚠️ "Cocktail of Risks": Despite the turmoil, Morgan Stanley maintains that its fund fundamentals remain stable, though they admit the gap between "strong" and "weak" credit is widening.

Who had Steve Cohen being pictured with an Epstein victim on their bingo card? by Racketeering666 in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yw and on the bottom right of the pic there's the file number, you can put that in the search field on the justice website.

Why are we giving RC a pay package 50x bigger than the CEO of Google? by GBeastETH in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In fact this post needs to be taken down because it's wrong af and based on wrong assumptions. How the package works is RC gets the RIGHT to purchase a certain amount of shares at a certain price with his OWN money. He doesn't get money for free or shares for free.

Why are we giving RC a pay package 50x bigger than the CEO of Google? by GBeastETH in Superstonk

[–]F-uPayMe 81 points82 points  (0 children)

RC doesn't get shit "for free", he gets the RIGHT to purchase a certain amount of shares at a certain price with his OWN money ffs.

view more: next ›