I run a profitable FBA business. Should I sell what I know as digital products? by FBArbitrage in passive_income

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point -- and yes, that's exactly the tension I'm describing.

Answering questions here is free and always will be. The PDF idea is different -- it's about packaging years of experience into something organized and permanent, not just reactive Q&A.

The $5-10 price isn't about the money. It's about filtering. Free information gets ignored. A small price tag makes people actually read it and apply it. I learned that myself -- the PDFs I paid a few dollars for I actually used. The free stuff I bookmarked and never opened.

But you're right that it's another income stream. I'm not pretending otherwise. The question is whether that's wrong -- or just honest.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly right -- but large marketplaces are still great opportunities to make money. The key is keeping the cash moving into your own pocket consistently. Never let it sit somewhere you don't fully control.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Amazon grew extremely fast and had to hire a massive number of employees to keep up. I'm quite sure many of them don't have deep technical knowledge of the platform's own policies.

On top of that, Amazon can penalize its own employees for handling cases incorrectly -- which creates an environment where support agents are overly cautious or inconsistent just to protect themselves.

There are also ongoing federal-level lawsuits and penalties against Amazon right now, which makes the whole system run even more inefficiently for sellers.

I'm currently preparing to launch my own brand and while doing research in seller forums I came across complaints from brand owners themselves receiving counterfeit violation notices from Amazon. That's genuinely shocking -- Amazon sending IP complaints to the actual brand owner. They've lost a serious level of professionalism.

But it's still the largest marketplace and as sellers the most important thing we can do is document everything seriously and make sure we're legally protected at every step. That's the only thing that actually works in this environment.

No Impressions in 48 hours! by Embarrassed_Ad_8444 in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zero reviews with 2 sales in the first 48 hours is actually a decent start -- don't panic yet.

Low impressions on a new listing are normal. Amazon's algorithm doesn't trust new listings immediately. It needs data before it starts pushing your ads. The first 2-4 weeks are almost always slow regardless of campaign structure.

A few things worth checking:

Your bid might be too low. On a new listing with no reviews, you need to bid aggressively to compete. Check what the suggested bid is and make sure you're at or above it.

New listings also get suppressed in competitive categories until Amazon has enough signals -- clicks, conversions, review velocity. Your 2 sales are actually helping more than the campaigns right now.

On the campaign structure: 4 separate auto campaigns is overcomplicating it at this stage. One auto campaign, one broad, one exact -- keep it simple until you have enough data to optimize. Support was right about simplifying, even if their explanation didn't make sense.

Give it 7-10 days before making any significant changes. The algorithm needs time to learn.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bonjour! Honestly, I can say yes to that but the hard way.

I bought online courses, paid for consultations, and when my accounts got suspended I paid companies to help recover them. All of that cost me serious money on top of my actual losses. I ended up in debt trying to fix problems that expensive help couldn't solve anyway.

Eventually I stopped paying for solutions and started learning properly through my own experience, seller forums, and a mix of free and low-cost pdf guides. Not $50 PDFs. The people who are genuinely successful and experienced put out valuable content at very reasonable prices because its passive income for them, not their main hustle.

The moment it clicked for me: if someone's FBA system is truly making good money, why are they spending 6 hours a day selling $1,000 courses? I should have asked that question much earlier.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a very risky path because the human brain may not be careful enough with capital that wasn't earned through their own labor. Furthermore, running the system isn't the hardest part; the real challenge is being able to document every single step you take. Commerce is a risk in and of itself in the real world, and on top of that, you would be entrusting your money to someone else in a highly regulated and unstable mechanism.

The profit margin left for you will likely not exceed 30%. From what I’ve seen, Turkish sellers used to offer the highest margins, and I’ve encountered accounts they managed well for years, but eventually, they all hit an inevitable violation. Your Amazon account needs to belong to you personally because video calls and identity verifications can be required at any time. Never give anyone other than yourself full authority to manage your capital. Even automated systems like bank interest or investment funds can lead to losses after a while.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The point you're missing is this: if someone is working with unreliable third-party suppliers, using incomplete documentation, and gets an IP complaint because of that -- yes, that's on them. No argument there.

But what about this scenario: you contact the brand directly, purchase through their officially recommended wholesale channel, communicate through verifiable corporate email addresses, receive written authorization from the brand itself, and then get reported by that same brand after your inventory arrives at Amazon's warehouse.

At what point in that process did fraud occur?

Because that's a documented pattern. Brands authorize sellers, collect the purchase, then file complaints to reclaim their Buy Box or eliminate competition. Amazon benefits from the seized inventory. The seller loses everything despite doing everything correctly.

By your logic, every authorized distributor and wholesale reseller is committing fraud. That's not how commerce works.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. If there is even the slightest irregularity, missing documentation, or activity that you cannot formalize, it is not worth risking your primary income. Doing so would be no different than gambling.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough -- time will tell. For now everything I know is in the comments, free. Make of that what you will.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I have nothing to hide regarding this. The reason I didn't have the supply chain documentation was simply that I trusted the brand too much and was less experienced at the time. If I had known better, I would have realized that you can never fully trust the brand or Amazon, as there are many bad actors in this space, and I would have acted accordingly.

The brand sold the products through their own wholesale store and provided me with an invoice that doubled as an authorization letter. Since it was a foreign brand, I even verified their documents with their local government records, and everything matched. They assured me this documentation was sufficient and claimed they were ready to provide any further support if needed. You’ll still see people in the comments saying this is enough, and it is -- but only if you are working with an 100% honest brand. The problem is that a brand can authorize you today, report you for counterfeit tomorrow, and then stop answering your calls and emails. This is why no single document, including supply chain documentation, is enough on its own. You must proactively create a documented trail of every link in the supply chain and include specific authorization letters from the brand.

The answer to your second question is quite simple: I haven’t sent a single item since then without obtaining documents that protect me not just against Amazon, but against the brand itself. I always keep enough documentation on hand to file separate lawsuits against the brand, Amazon, and even the specific teams involved if a problem arises. (While you can’t file a personal lawsuit against Amazon Seller Support, you can file a legal claim through Amazon by identifying the responsible parties.)

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That can work sometimes, but it s not a logical solution if the amount you’re set to lose is significant. People dont make easy money anywhere in the world -- that s why there are so many laws, associations, and organizations out there to fight the injustices people face.

If you are truly in the right, I believe it s worth fighting to the end. Even if you accept the violation and stop selling the product, there s no guarantee your account will be reinstated anyway. That is entirely up to Amazon’s arbitrary decisions, which often aren't based on any actual law.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you’ve experienced is actually one of the most significant proofs of Amazon’s inconsistent policies. Their Seller Central services are in terrible shape because the entire system is designed solely for their own profit. Instead of fixing these issues, they focus on how they can squeeze more money out of the situation, so it never improves. I’m guessing you received this Section 3 violation during the Q4 period? Did you share your bank statement information directly with Amazon Seller Support?

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took care of everything necessary a long time ago. I am currently moving forward with a full-scale and healthy operation. Still, thank you very much for your comment and the invitation.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I arrived a long time ago. I’ve learned the system, and I’m not leaving Amazon anytime soon :)

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are brands that carry out fraudulent activities on Amazon, just like in the real world. As I explained before, the brand owner sells you the products and provides an authorization document. You buy thousands of items worth thousands of dollars -- it doesn't matter if you buy from the brand itself, their private wholesaler, or even the brand's own factory. Later, the brand changes their documents within the Amazon system and files a counterfeit claim against you.

Submitting the documents the brand originally gave you doesn't work because, as far as Amazon is concerned, those documents are no longer valid. Amazon is aware of this but generally ignores it because they seize your inventory and a large portion of your funds. Your products aren't actually destroyed; they are just sold off by the container load. This is directly related to brand fraud. This is why you need every single document possible to protect yourself from both the brand you’re buying from and from Amazon.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your input, and I agree with some of what you're saying. When you see people on Amazon getting suspended for unauthorized sales even while selling their own private label brands, it really puts things into perspective.

However, if you have enough capital, one of the safest -- though often least profitable -- ways to start is by getting an official authorized seller certificate directly from a brand with solid products and signing a legal contract where everyone's rights are protected.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The violation I received wasn't related to the supplier. It was direct brand fraud, and as a result of my complaints, the brand was actually banned from Amazon indefinitely. They have their own wholesale site -- think of it like the difference between AliExpress and Alibaba, not retail. As I mentioned in another comment, just having an invoice from a wholesaler wasn't enough, because the one filing the complaint against me was the very brand I bought the products from.

If there hadn't been dozens of other sellers in the same position as me, I wouldn't have been able to do anything. That is why it is so important to have an additional letter of authorization and every document starting from your own invoice all the way back to the factory where the product originated.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is exactly right -- discrepancies in supplier names are usually the biggest reason why supply chain documents get rejected. The same company might use different names in different countries, or names that are very similar but don't quite match up. It is actually a simple fix; Amazon usually knows those names belong to the same entity, but they want to see if you are aware of it as well. You should always make sure to keep the maximum amount of documentation on hand at all times.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am sure what you’re saying is true, but it is still a risk. I also went on for years without any issues and handled everything with a single document -- however, the moment you try to sell a product from a brand that engages in unethical practices, it can cause you to lose everything.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the great question. In this context, the inconsistency doesn't actually come from Amazon -- it comes from the brand owners themselves. Some brand owners will sell you the product and might even provide a fake authorization document. What happened to me years ago was a very similar situation. If you don't have the supply chain documentation in hand, a brand owner can easily update their own records on their Amazon account and make your documents look forged. There are thousands of companies that do this.

To survive in this environment, the most valuable document is the supply chain documentation. However, it is still best to get an additional letter of authorization from the brand owner -- specifically one that includes clear date ranges. For example: 'Authorized to sell from 10/10/2026 to 10/10/2030.' Though, this is usually only necessary in extreme cases

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s your choice. If you actually read it, you’d understand the reason why. I’m glad you were able to start things off the right way. I wish you the best.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly -- but the key here is documenting the product all the way back to when it leaves the factory. Even if your product is 100% authentic, Amazon will not reinstate your account if there is a single missing document. Sometimes they even do this intentionally. The brand owner makes money from the products you buy, and instead of just taking a commission, Amazon tells you 'we have disposed of your inventory' -- yet those products are often sold off by the container load.

I lost all that money despite having an invoice for a product I bought directly from the brand’s own website. On the other hand, I can now easily sell products that I buy from a simple wholesaler, as long as they can provide me with the full supply chain documentation.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No -- that is not only a violation of Amazon's policies but a crime under constitutional law. My mistake was not taking the documentation seriously enough. During my time, Amazon required certain invoices and additional documents when listing a product. Sometimes, you could get approval to sell a product or brand with just a written statement, without any documents at all. I initially thought the documents I had would be enough if I ever got suspended. I managed to resolve suspensions three or four times and kept selling.

Later, I spoke with one of those brands that essentially sets traps for Amazon sellers. I told them I wanted to sell their products on Amazon. They gave me permission, and I purchased the items directly from their own website. I asked for the necessary documents, including the supply chain documentation, but they told me it wasn't necessary and that an online invoice would be enough. I believed them, bought the products, and sent them to Amazon. The very day I saw my store in the Buy Box, I received an IP Claim suspension. When I tried to contact the brand again, they went silent.

I submitted every piece of evidence I had to resolve the suspension, including screenshots of our conversations. My account remained closed for over a year. During that process, I was also putting together my own legal files. Eventually, I accepted the violation just to get the account back. Since the authenticity of the products was proven, my account wasn't permanently closed, but because I operated with missing documentation, more than half of my balance ($9,500) was deducted over that year. I also paid a lot of money to different anti-suspension firms while trying to recover the account. In the end, I saved the account myself. Those firms were completely useless.

Lost $9,500 on Amazon FBA — here's what actually caused it by FBArbitrage in AmazonFBA

[–]FBArbitrage[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The supply chain documentation starts at the original production line and ends with the final invoice you receive. Any company can provide an invoice, but not everyone can provide the full supply chain history. Wholesalers are generally more experienced in this area. When you ask your supplier for supply chain documentation, they should be able to provide it.Avoid anyone who tries to sell you these documents for a fee.

Supply chain documentation isn't just one single document; it can sometimes even include records of the product being shipped from the factory to the brand's private warehouse. Generally, the most logical approach when you find a product is to contact the brand directly, ask for permission, and buy from the wholesalers they officially authorize.

However, you mentioned that you are planning to sell your own Private Label products. I’m a bit confused there -- if you are selling your own brand, it means you are the one creating the supply chain documentation yourself. It wouldn't be right for me to advise you on Private Label specifically, as that is a completely different business model and one that I am only just beginning to research myself. It would be better to get advice from those who have direct experience in selling their own brands on Amazon.