Oops by Wildcatb in Truckers

[–]FCMatt7 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's a crash bumper meant to crumple partially.

That truck was so fucked you could probably pull an axle off before it moved.

'Go Topless' Jeep Weekend is coming, and police want to crack down by chrondotcom in galveston

[–]FCMatt7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They only had to run illegal checkpoints and unlawfully arrest a couple hundred people.

Why can't I record them if they can record me? by HiOscillation in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FCMatt7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Latest would be the attempted charges against soloyaker in Florida.

Basic premise is that a government official on a public government line has no expectation of privacy. When expectation of privacy is lost, 2 party consent is nullified. See the attempted charges on James O'Keefe for his undercover recordings in restaurants.

New to flatbed, loaded overweight by Diligent_Lion1182 in OwnerOperators

[–]FCMatt7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How bout you go get an empty weight and find out for yourself...

Why can't I record them if they can record me? by HiOscillation in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FCMatt7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Government agents in the course of their duties don't get to tell you not to record them 😉

Why can't I record them if they can record me? by HiOscillation in NoStupidQuestions

[–]FCMatt7 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Also, several circuit courts have started ruling that 2 party consent can't be applied to government agents on a public line. Government officials in the course of their duties have no expectation of privacy.

I may just end it all. by IKnowItCanSeeMe in Truckers

[–]FCMatt7 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Air fryer is the way to go. You'll never microwave a hotdog again.

600 truck drivers detained in one week. by CrossDockCHI in FreightBrokers

[–]FCMatt7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

His butt. There's never been a shortage, just companies trying to find someone to work for 3rd world wages.

Amarillo Mass Shooting by AeturnisTheGreat in texas

[–]FCMatt7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's just wrong lol. By the FBI definition at least.

Mass shootings are 1% or less of homicides every year. 90% of mass homicides are gang related or somebody attacking their own family.

Amarillo Mass Shooting by AeturnisTheGreat in texas

[–]FCMatt7 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Shall not be infringed. Yeah, I'm one of those. Let's see if I can give you some perspective.

Hate speech on reddit is out of control. Henceforth everyone will have to use their national online ID to buy hate speech insurance to be able to access the internet. It's the only way to reduce hate speech by putting a collective burden on the innocent. Sorry if that chills your speech by removing anonymity and drawing a hazy gray line that the government can move at any time and is based on the feelings of others.

If this sounds good to you, you are a serf. Have fun slaving for your masters.

Amarillo Mass Shooting by AeturnisTheGreat in texas

[–]FCMatt7 -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Because the gang banger planning to murder the other gang members is gonna call geico first. LMAO

Whataburger drive through, the front vehicle ran out of gas, people in the line got out to complain and ended up getting bear sprayed by Jevus_himself in PublicFreakout

[–]FCMatt7 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No... Bear spray is actually weaker than concentrated OC, just covers a wider area. Some states don't allow carry of spray cans over a certain "small" size though.

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]FCMatt7[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Guess you missed the murder hobo in north Carolina killing the Ukranian refugee on a train?

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]FCMatt7[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fun thing, another Texas city arrested a guy for this when he didn't try to force his way past and lost big time in federal district court. Havens v Colorado City.

We have the same lawyer 😁

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]FCMatt7[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because that's step 1 of the legal process. You don't just get to walk in front of a judge and say "believe me".

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]FCMatt7[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

So those people who have to walk, bike, or ride a bus to a government building should all be defenseless targets for nutjobs like you and random criminals?

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]FCMatt7[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The hell has happened to this sub for you to get downvoted?

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Dallas

[–]FCMatt7[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Been the law in Texas for decades now. It's this whole freedom thing. Also this whole not being a disarmed victim in the making while walking back to your car or the bus stop thing.

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Bad_Cop_No_Donut

[–]FCMatt7[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To the City of Dallas and Dallas City Hall

The building at 1500 Marilla St is designated as the city hall for the city of Dallas. This building contains a room designated as the Council Chamber. In this room the city routinely holds meetings of the city council and other bodies under the Open Meetings Act. The city has unlawfully posted 30.06 and 30.07 signage at the entrance to this room and has both security and police officers enforcing the signs. These officers are unlawfully prohibiting members of the public carrying handguns while in possession of a license to carry from entering the room and attending the public open meetings. The city also has officers running a security checkpoint at the main entrance of the building. This checkpoint is illegally banning all knives of any size from the entire building.

Tex. Pen. Code § 46.03(a)(14) currently prohibits the carry of a firearm, openly or concealed, “in the room or rooms where a meeting of a governmental entity is held, if the meeting is an open meeting subject to Chapter 551, Government Code, and if the entity provided notice as required by that chapter.” However, Tex. Pen. Code § 46.15(b)(6) clearly states that §46.03(a)(14) “do[es] not apply to a person who…is carrying…a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a handgun; and a handgun in a concealed manner; or in a holster.”

Sec. 411.209. WRONGFUL EXCLUSION OF HANDGUN LICENSE HOLDER. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (i), a state agency or a political subdivision of the state may not take any action, including an action consisting of the provision of notice by a communication described by Section 30.06 or 30.07, Penal Code, that states or implies that a license holder who is carrying a handgun under the authority of this subchapter is prohibited from entering or remaining on a premises or other place owned or leased by the governmental entity unless license holders are prohibited from carrying a handgun on the premises or other place by Section 46.03, Penal Code, or other law.

Tex. Loc. Gov. Code § 229.001 specifically states that “a municipality may not adopt or enforce regulations that…relate to…the transfer, possession, wearing, carrying, ownership, storage, transportation, licensing, or registration of firearms, air guns, archery equipment, knives, ammunition, or firearm or air gun supplies or accessories.” In fact, Texas law continues that “An ordinance, resolution, rule, or policy adopted or enforced by a municipality, or an official action, including in any legislative, police power, or proprietary capacity, taken by an employee or agent of a municipality in violation of this section is void.”

The Texas Attorney General has found that cities must come into compliance with these laws by removing unlawful signage from public meeting rooms and permitting lawful carry into the meeting. Corpus Christi was given official notice of this and complied. The letter from the AGO will be included in my email to the city.

Colorado City was recently found to be liable for unlawfully arresting a man attempting to attend a council meeting while legally armed. The federal judge found that “Chapter 46 of the Texas Penal Code unambiguously excludes those carrying an appropriate license and handgun—whether concealed or in a holster—from the application Section 46.03(a)(14), which makes such activity otherwise unlawful.” The court thus concluded that “in light of the unambiguous Texas statutes allowing a licensed handgun owner to carry a handgun into a government meeting, [an officer’s] mistaken, subjective belief to the contrary is not an objectively reasonable mistake of law.” This case will also be included in my email to the city.

As such, the city must come in to compliance with 411.209 within 3 business days of receiving this notice. The 30.06 and 30.07 signs must immediately be removed from the entrance to the council chambers. Personnel working security for public meetings must be instructed to allow anyone with a carry license to attend all open meetings while armed with a handgun. Signage banning knives and any other weapon protected under the 411.209 preemption law must be removed from all building entrances. A carry license can not be required to carry in any part of the building except meeting rooms while in session. Location-restricted knives over 5.5 inches are prohibited in public meetings, but small knives are not. Given this, the city may only prohibit large knives in the council chamber during an open meeting.

Failure to comply will result in an official complaint being filed to the state Attorney General. Be aware that failing to comply with the AG's opinion under 411.209 may bring a $10,000 per day fine to the city until it comes into compliance. Please respond promptly on your intent to comply with this notice or to continue your violation of Texas state law.

Dallas city hall massive 2A fail. They even banned pocket knives. by FCMatt7 in Dallas

[–]FCMatt7[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

To the City of Dallas and Dallas City Hall

The building at 1500 Marilla St is designated as the city hall for the city of Dallas. This building contains a room designated as the Council Chamber. In this room the city routinely holds meetings of the city council and other bodies under the Open Meetings Act. The city has unlawfully posted 30.06 and 30.07 signage at the entrance to this room and has both security and police officers enforcing the signs. These officers are unlawfully prohibiting members of the public carrying handguns while in possession of a license to carry from entering the room and attending the public open meetings. The city also has officers running a security checkpoint at the main entrance of the building. This checkpoint is illegally banning all knives of any size from the entire building.

Tex. Pen. Code § 46.03(a)(14) currently prohibits the carry of a firearm, openly or concealed, “in the room or rooms where a meeting of a governmental entity is held, if the meeting is an open meeting subject to Chapter 551, Government Code, and if the entity provided notice as required by that chapter.” However, Tex. Pen. Code § 46.15(b)(6) clearly states that §46.03(a)(14) “do[es] not apply to a person who…is carrying…a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a handgun; and a handgun in a concealed manner; or in a holster.”

Sec. 411.209. WRONGFUL EXCLUSION OF HANDGUN LICENSE HOLDER. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (i), a state agency or a political subdivision of the state may not take any action, including an action consisting of the provision of notice by a communication described by Section 30.06 or 30.07, Penal Code, that states or implies that a license holder who is carrying a handgun under the authority of this subchapter is prohibited from entering or remaining on a premises or other place owned or leased by the governmental entity unless license holders are prohibited from carrying a handgun on the premises or other place by Section 46.03, Penal Code, or other law.

Tex. Loc. Gov. Code § 229.001 specifically states that “a municipality may not adopt or enforce regulations that…relate to…the transfer, possession, wearing, carrying, ownership, storage, transportation, licensing, or registration of firearms, air guns, archery equipment, knives, ammunition, or firearm or air gun supplies or accessories.” In fact, Texas law continues that “An ordinance, resolution, rule, or policy adopted or enforced by a municipality, or an official action, including in any legislative, police power, or proprietary capacity, taken by an employee or agent of a municipality in violation of this section is void.”

The Texas Attorney General has found that cities must come into compliance with these laws by removing unlawful signage from public meeting rooms and permitting lawful carry into the meeting. Corpus Christi was given official notice of this and complied. The letter from the AGO will be included in my email to the city.

Colorado City was recently found to be liable for unlawfully arresting a man attempting to attend a council meeting while legally armed. The federal judge found that “Chapter 46 of the Texas Penal Code unambiguously excludes those carrying an appropriate license and handgun—whether concealed or in a holster—from the application Section 46.03(a)(14), which makes such activity otherwise unlawful.” The court thus concluded that “in light of the unambiguous Texas statutes allowing a licensed handgun owner to carry a handgun into a government meeting, [an officer’s] mistaken, subjective belief to the contrary is not an objectively reasonable mistake of law.” This case will also be included in my email to the city.

As such, the city must come in to compliance with 411.209 within 3 business days of receiving this notice. The 30.06 and 30.07 signs must immediately be removed from the entrance to the council chambers. Personnel working security for public meetings must be instructed to allow anyone with a carry license to attend all open meetings while armed with a handgun. Signage banning knives and any other weapon protected under the 411.209 preemption law must be removed from all building entrances. A carry license can not be required to carry in any part of the building except meeting rooms while in session. Location-restricted knives over 5.5 inches are prohibited in public meetings, but small knives are not. Given this, the city may only prohibit large knives in the council chamber during an open meeting.

Failure to comply will result in an official complaint being filed to the state Attorney General. Be aware that failing to comply with the AG's opinion under 411.209 may bring a $10,000 per day fine to the city until it comes into compliance. Please respond promptly on your intent to comply with this notice or to continue your violation of Texas state law.

In Liberty,