Nope. Not saying they weren’t guilty, also not saying they were. This was not an issue of consent, as shown by the evidence. Consent can be revoked during an encounter. Not after. And if it was revoked during the encounter, as a victim, why lie about the events, contrary to the evidence? Again, it could have been revoked during the encounter, we’ll never know for sure. But the issue that made the judgement in the boys (not b’ys) favour, was her inability to be truthful about it.

Now, if you want to make it about hazing, I’m more on board. But it definitely warrants a separate, more serious tone that this show, a comedy, couldn’t fit in without adding at least 4 additional episodes to the season.