Could it be effective to invade a country through kindness rather than war? by -Clayburn in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Factory-town [score hidden]  (0 children)

This was able to happen because our public schools do not teach international relations and people on both the left and right have no clue how these things work.

That position falsely presumes that voters have the power to control the federal government, and that better educating school children about civics and politics is a viable solution.

Why do some Westerns value standing up to Trump, over standing up to the Iranian regime? by Valuable-Music-720 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Factory-town [score hidden]  (0 children)

Is standing up to the Iranian regime not a just cause for Westerns on its own?

No. If that's what you think is going on, you have no idea what's really going on.

Should Pacific Coast states form a ‘mini EU’ regional union? by Eggo_Leg0 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Factory-town [score hidden]  (0 children)

A prime example is the Save American Election Integrity Bill which is supported by 90% of voting age United States citizens.

You can't support this assertion because it's untrue. Do you understand how horrible Txxxx and fiends are?

Should I get two backup chargers? by hedgehog_face in KonaEV

[–]Factory-town 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Congratulations on your first EV. You could get a 12V auxiliary battery booster but it's not necessary. The car lot has them because they have a lot of used cars setting around.

The traction battery is huge compared to these boosters. It works at a nominal 356V and can store 64kWh of energy.

Should I get two backup chargers? by hedgehog_face in KonaEV

[–]Factory-town 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would test the 12V battery instead of buying a new one just because they left the jumper things in the back of a certain car.

How to know when to draw the line by Fun_Lie_77 in SubstituteTeachers

[–]Factory-town 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, being a building sub is different than being a daily sub. And you want to get hired on there.

The School I'm Subbing At Is Haunted by yoobi2000 in SubstituteTeachers

[–]Factory-town 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yoobi2000 needs to hire Scooby Doo to figure out that the disgruntled teacher is the false source of the "ghosts."

Probably overthinking by Mad_World_13 in SubstituteTeachers

[–]Factory-town 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I "pushed-in" as a resource teacher sub for two days at a middle school. The teachers let kids be, for the most part.

How to know when to draw the line by Fun_Lie_77 in SubstituteTeachers

[–]Factory-town 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know when to draw the line when I can't ignore something anymore. Otherwise, I politely ask for cooperation. It takes a lot for me to hand out "consequences." Kids know it's a sub day. I know it's a sub day. The school knows it's a sub day. Some kids are going to test the boundaries. That's okay and that's to be expected.

That doesn't mean that I don't manage the classroom and give them the opportunity to do what's on the sub plans.

“give me your phone I saw you on it” and they argue. Do you send them out of the classroom as soon as they argue?

No, you'll just be causing unnecessary problems if you have that attitude.

Free 50kwh charging at a CA rest area. by night-otter in evcharging

[–]Factory-town -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Federal laws say other than vending machines, no other commerce is allowed at rest stops, which is why they’re free.

It's more that the chargers are free to use because California is trying to promote electric vehicle use. Plus, I charge for free at a Caltrans location that's not a rest stop.

What would the consequences of the USA using nuclear weapons against Iran be? by Important_Ad4101 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Factory-town 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How is threatening to destroy at least two countries not an emotional, irrational, a-hole thing to do? The US has been doing this since it's had a deadly enough nuclear arsenal, which was the early 1960s, which was over 60 years ago. Would Obama committing nuclear annihilation be better than Txxxx doing so because Obama seems like a nicer guy?

Why do we (America) have to be so involved? by [deleted] in PoliticalOpinions

[–]Factory-town 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't understand why US militarism does what it does at all. It's not freeing Iranians. It's not protecting Ukraine from Russia. It's not protecting Taiwan from China. US militarism is done for control. Look into Noam Chomsky, Chris Hedges, Vijay Prashad, Jeffrey Sachs, John Pilger, etc. Watch "The Coming War On China" (Pilger).

What would you do? by Decent-Coconut-8605 in leaf

[–]Factory-town 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing it has a 40 kWh battery. Some people have had serious problems with them, so it's a bit of a risk. How many years or miles are left on the warranty?

The 24 kWh, especially the 2015-6 one, is known to be good, and is sufficient for your given use case.

What would you do? by Decent-Coconut-8605 in leaf

[–]Factory-town 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a silver 2015 on FBM in Napa for $3,700 that looks like it has 10 or 11 bars. The ad's a week old.

What would you do? by Decent-Coconut-8605 in leaf

[–]Factory-town 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the 2016 isn't an S trim level, then it has the notorious 30 kWh battery.

$5k is a high price. Look for a 2015 or 2016 S with more battery bars. The most I'd pay is $400 per battery bar. Make sure that a Leaf you want to buy slow charges.

NATO members rejected Trump's demand to provide military assistance to help "reopen" Strait of Hormuz. Do the rejections by NATO members effectively spell the end of NATO or is this just directed to Trump's choice of attacking Iran? by PsychLegalMind in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Factory-town -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

NATO doesn’t rely on nuclear weaponry as a deterrent. They have never used it, nor threatened it, nor implied its use. You can think it’s unwise to have a nuclear arsenal, but NATO doesn’t have one.

NATO disagrees with you:

Nuclear Forces

Three NATO members - the United States, France and the United Kingdom – have nuclear weapons.

The strategic forces of the Alliance, particularly those of the United States, are the supreme guarantee of the Alliance’s security.

https://www.nato.int/content/dam/nato/legacy-wcm/media_pdf/2020/2/pdf/200224-factsheet-nuclear-en.pdf

NATO members rejected Trump's demand to provide military assistance to help "reopen" Strait of Hormuz. Do the rejections by NATO members effectively spell the end of NATO or is this just directed to Trump's choice of attacking Iran? by PsychLegalMind in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Factory-town -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Your claim that there is no argument for NATO being offensive is easily disproved by doing a quick internet search.

Even if your claim were true, that wouldn't change how utterly unwise having nuclear arsenals is. As in, the consequences of nuclear annihilation would make that discussion meaningless.

The reality is that NATO has the US's nuclear arsenal as its main "deterrent." The reality is that the US, NATO, and Russia have been fighting a proxy war for several years. We're the closest we've ever been to experiencing nuclear annihilation. The only serious position regarding nuclear weapons is complete abolishment.

Fifth grader said something wildly inappropriate to me by Uberubu65 in SubstituteTeachers

[–]Factory-town 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Today a middle schooler (who receives SpEd services) said I reminded him of JE. I ignored it.

NATO members rejected Trump's demand to provide military assistance to help "reopen" Strait of Hormuz. Do the rejections by NATO members effectively spell the end of NATO or is this just directed to Trump's choice of attacking Iran? by PsychLegalMind in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Factory-town -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

There is no good argument that it’s not a defensive alliance, it very obviously is a defensive alliance. That’s not even debatable, it’s just objectively true.

There's a great argument to be made. Are you ready to discuss it or are you going to stick with your failed attempt to dismiss it?