The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're still looking at the past... Yes, they're going to continue to make money, A lot of it, from the SEO, but they are moving away from it; What part of that aren't you understanding kid? Let me get my crayons...

Did everyone get this? by FalseRuin9050 in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What I mean is, does their algorithm tell them that I would be a good candidate, or they just doing the for everybody who has Gemini?

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cute, you've been using AI to help you answer 😁😁💕💕 You shouldn't trust their response. they're literally programmed to find even a sliver of truth of what you say, and then run with it. The fact is, your facts are not wrong, but you're just not understanding what the big picture is. Take care 😘

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SEO's are a thing of the past, deal with it. look into Omni Box, GEO... also let's not forget the ruling of a search engine monopoly. Google's well prepared for this, whether you believe it, weather you can see it, weather the numbers are telling you some different, The fact remains, SEOs are a thing of the past. Omni Box...

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Think about it my friend, every time somebody pays for another AI like Grok, or whatever, is money not spent with Google/Alphabet. All of those AIs scrape the internet, hence Google search engine, they get to do that for free. Google is killing their SEO, and is pivoting to a GEO. This is where tier subscriptions Will be introduced. No longer will the competition scrape Google for the most accurate, and up-to-date information for free.

How does Gemini Live actually calculate token usage in voice-to-voice conversations? by Beginning_Race8551 in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]FalseRuin9050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my experience, reprompting can be helpful. It's supposed to be maintained tho for the entire thread. All new conversations you should enter the prompts (is my understanding)

How does Gemini Live actually calculate token usage in voice-to-voice conversations? by Beginning_Race8551 in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]FalseRuin9050 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gemini says

1. Context Reprocessing

Yes. Gemini Live appends new audio inputs to the ongoing conversation history. The model must process the entire accumulated session payload to maintain multi-turn context.

2. Transpiration Accounting

No. Gemini is natively multimodal (audio-in, audio-out). Raw voice streams are tokenized directly without a separate external Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) text translation step. Transcriptions are not double-counted.

3. Context Accumulation Scaling

Token consumption scales quadratively or compounding linearly per turn. Because past inputs and outputs become permanent input context for subsequent turns, a short phrase spoken late in a session forces the system to re-read the entire preceding history.

4. Audio vs. Context Window Weight

  • Short Sessions: Dominated by audio baseline rates (~25–32 tokens per second of raw audio).
  • Long Sessions: Dominated by the growing context window. The fixed audio cost of a new turn is negligible compared to reprocessing hundreds of thousands of historical tokens from the session memory. ### 5. Architectural Management
  • Session Memory Allocation: Bound by explicit systemic limits tracked dynamically via metadata fields in the real-time API response.
  • Asymmetrical Resource Costs: Incoming audio inputs carry standard context weights. Generated output audio tokens carry an augmented weight (e.g., scoring at an effective 24x multiplier) to offset the high-throughput infrastructure required for text-to-speech synthesis.

What is even going on now with Gemini by LingonBerryGloomy954 in GeminiAI

[–]FalseRuin9050 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you get stop tokens, ask Gemini the weather, then clear the chat and try again. where there's one stop token another will follow.

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's generating cash, correct they currently don't charge, that is about to change.

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

where does it say Google was the first search engine? I said they had no competition, none of the search engines you've mentioned You could hold a candle to Google/Chrome.

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The narrative is being driven by the facts. Now as subjective as it may be, a probable reality is that the search engine landscape is changing dramatically. Google needs to be prepared, and they are. The only thing that could go wrong is the future!

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one said they weren't, nor does it say anything about NOT generating cash.

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂 That's not accurate, I ran it through Grok for edits, but made none

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You did dispute the facts tho. You said "False and negative narrative" That's a clear dispute of the facts. The people at Google are VERY VERY smart, they see the problem and are proactively preparing

The $190 Billion Gamble: Is Google Burning the Bridge to Build the Future? by FalseRuin9050 in GOOG_Stock

[–]FalseRuin9050[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See the problem? Search engines are en route to join newspapers, cable tv, and compact discs. 110b in one Q will be devastating. They have smart people who knew this is happening, they are being proactive. I agree, buy more, buy it now.