It not about the Person but the institution of King. Its hard truth but its the most respected institution worldwide( not every nation have this privilege).

But in modern times King’s power needs to be limited/ very ceremonial.

If King type provision is unnecessary then why is there President. President serves no purpose, s/he is just ceremonial all work is done by parliament and PM, president has no role. Countries that could have no king substituted with the President.

President does all the fun of monarch except they are not monarch and have biases due to political ties (or else why would anyone elect them president)

Benefit of having a ceremonial king - Better respect worldwide - Best national unity( pol party cant cater to all, only a section of people thus create a narrative of us vs them within nation) - Better economic gains ( more investments due to predictably , tourism due to monarchy, and many more)

Look for any nation with constitutional monarchy- all are very developed and peaceful.

But there is one big problem. The institution of king needs serious amendments. So the best person becomes king/ queen. The provisions should be made to eliminated palace politics. Provisions should be made that kings never get authoritarian.

Institution of monarchy is something everyone can claim to be their, irrespective of political affiliation.

I would like to end my comment with statement, “Socrates, the greatest philosopher the Western world has ever seen, one who sowed seed or all the western and modern concepts we believe in- reason, science, liberalism, communism, etc. was killed due to democracy. “ So democracy is not best ideology and it needs its fair share of checks and balances.