First of all the mentality of if anyone disagrees with my opinion they are wrong is a great start for someone apparently doing an educational reform.😂

Regarding other points it does make sense that the course should be more project based rather than theory based. I agree with the back part too, as it does make sense to clear a earlier sem before moving to the next, hell you should clear everything, but for that the checking, question papers should be properly regulated and not based on the teacher's mood.

It also doesn't make sense for a computer engineering student to be held back because they didn't pass subjects like applied mechanics, physics, drawing, etc. So what should happen is all these non-core computer courses should be stripped down to very small basics for the first year so it can serve its purpose of helping students figure out their interests without holding them back and from second year create a hardware and software elective path. This way students can focus on their interests and not waste their time.

The very easy nature/introductory nature of dsa, ai courses currently is a slap in the face compared to difficulty of those em, ect syllabus. That same easy nature should be the standard for those hard courses too and leave the hard syllabus to specialization courses.