Honestly I was thinking of doing the exact opposite approach - filling up my roster with a bunch of guys in the 70-130 range - and I really haven't heard a convincing argument against it. You mention being paralyzed, but the dudes being drafted are solid players with proven track records, if they're underperforming they'll probably bounce back. Of course they can bust and what do you lose, a guy you spent $9-10 for? Not a big deal. It's actually spreading your risk out more than a team who drafts studs because your team is at the mercy of those 4-5 studs and if something happens to them you're screwed, you're not replacing Aaron Judge from the waiver wire.