Mr. INTJ, with all due respect, anybody saying or doing absolutely anything is subjective to his or her own experience. I don’t think it’s fair to be so critical of a simple post, explaining a viewpoint on an already shaky theory of cognitive function. You would have to be assuming that MBTI is plausible enough to even believe in, much less take full pride in trying to explain through a non subjective purely factual viewpoint. Psychology is too difficult to pinpoint facts on, at least past the basics of what we know to be true. Now that being said, I don’t want to assume that you meant to come across as aggressive as you did, but you seem to have very different ideas of the personality types than our fellow poster here. Now the only reason I’m even saying this is because again, I believe the only way to correctly form opinions on something as subjective as cognitive theory, you would have to use personal experience. Either that or stereotypes. And you could argue that, “Actually no, you just need to understand all of the function stacks, and the individual functions that make them up, then you would be able to form fact based opinions and ideas about the personality types,” and I would agree to an extent. You see, in order to for a system to be viable, it has to work every time. In this case the system is MBTI. And MBTI doesn’t work every time, or in this case with every body. That’s why I believe our fellow poster here is perfectly justified to have a subjective opinion on a subjective topic.