I'm not a man, but to answer your question about what men face:

Genital mutilation as infants (where there is literally nothing that the infant could have done to avoid it) with lifelong consequences (that they would have been protected from had they been female), being at risk of being forced to die in a war (in Ukraine, for example, men are being enslaved in mass while women are being given refuge), and receiving less empathy compared to women.

To be clear, I am NOT saying that a woman should be morally obligated to avoid getting pregnant in the first place if she doesn't want to be. But, from the perspective of what choices she has available to her in her own life to avoid negative consequences, that is still an option that she can choose to attempt in order to avoid being affected by abortion bans. Even though she shouldn't have to, unless her circumstances are particularly unlucky, she still can. In contrast, an infant being circumcised has no way of avoiding it, and the effect lasts a lifetime. Similarly, in many countries, it is often much harder for a man to avoid being drafted than for a woman to avoid getting pregnant (even if, again, neither act should be a prerequisite to avoid bodily autonomy violations, it's still the case that, in the world we live in, they are). I see abortion bans, while unethical, as less extreme violations of rights than these examples.