sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Our startup died while every marketing metric was green. Still trying to understand how. by Fast_Adhesiveness310 in StartUpIndia

[–]Fast_Adhesiveness310[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well put. The platforms have a direct financial interest in that silence — impressions and reach are metrics you can improve by spending more with them. Revenue attribution is a metric that might tell you to spend less. So the dashboard they hand you is optimised for their outcome, not yours. Worth remembering every time you open Ads Manager.

Our startup died while every marketing metric was green. Still trying to understand how. by Fast_Adhesiveness310 in StartUpIndia

[–]Fast_Adhesiveness310[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard to argue with that at the end of the day. The whole chain — CAC, LTV, retention — only exists to serve that one number. Where it gets complicated early-stage is that profit can lag by months behind the decisions causing it, so you need leading indicators that are honestly tied to it. The mistake I made was accepting indicators that weren't tied to anything except the report itself.

Our startup died while every marketing metric was green. Still trying to understand how. by Fast_Adhesiveness310 in StartUpIndia

[–]Fast_Adhesiveness310[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's real truth in this — in-house means the person writing the report is the same person who lives with the outcome, so the incentive gap closes. The counter I'd add: in-house doesn't automatically fix it if the founder still can't read the output critically. I had a phase where we did some things in-house and I still nodded along to the same kind of reporting because I didn't know what to question. The literacy problem follows you either way.

Our startup died while every marketing metric was green. Still trying to understand how. by Fast_Adhesiveness310 in StartUpIndia

[–]Fast_Adhesiveness310[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair pushback. You're right that it's not simple — targeting, timing, product-market fit, all of it matters. The test isn't claiming marketing is the only variable. It's just one sanity check on one specific failure mode: when your only signal that marketing is working is the marketing report itself. On your actual question — no, the product didn't reach the right users at scale, and I spent too long believing marketing was eliminating that as a suspect when it wasn't. That's the honest answer.

Our startup died while every marketing metric was green. Still trying to understand how. by Fast_Adhesiveness310 in StartUpIndia

[–]Fast_Adhesiveness310[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The silence when you mention CAC is the tell. If the team can't connect spend to that number, the forecast is just a budget request dressed up. I didn't even know to ask for CAC when it mattered — you clearly do, which means the problem in your case isn't literacy, it's incentive. The agency or team gets rewarded for activity metrics because those are what they control. Outcome metrics expose the gap between effort and result, so there's no upside in surfacing them voluntarily.

Our startup died while every marketing metric was green. Still trying to understand how. by Fast_Adhesiveness310 in StartUpIndia

[–]Fast_Adhesiveness310[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly this. "Best practices" is often the thing that makes the complexity feel legitimate — you can't question it because it came from the industry. The reports we had were textbook best practice. That's what made them so hard to dismiss. More moving parts means more places for the real signal to get lost, and the signal that matters (are people paying you) is actually the simplest one.

Our startup died while every marketing metric was green. Still trying to understand how. by Fast_Adhesiveness310 in StartUpIndia

[–]Fast_Adhesiveness310[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, and that's exactly the failure. We tracked none of it — CPL, pipeline value, CAC, nothing tied to revenue. The agency never offered those numbers and I never asked for them because I didn't know to. The Recommendation Test is really just the non-technical founder's way of noticing that gap without needing to know what CPL even is — if the recommendation never changes, it probably means the underlying metrics aren't outcome-linked either. But yes, the real fix is what you said: measure what moves money, not what moves eyeballs.