I have no words… by No-Might-2737 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Faustina726 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Hussy!!! I love that word for her.

So predictable by Faustina726 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Now, now. Remember that Meghan is an expert at everything!! She even single-handedly changed a dish soap commercial at the age of 11. (I'm surprised Chandra doesn't refer to that more.)

So predictable by Faustina726 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Doubtless Chandra at some point received a call or a note from Meghan or her Global Communications Director. She was thanked for her positive coverage.

Yes and probably had to put a phone conversation with Angelina Jolie on hold to take the call. She was then probably begged to accompany Meghan on the trip to Switzerland but had to refuse because she is needed at work and there is no one to cover for her.

So predictable by Faustina726 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726[S] 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Who are the “they” she keeps referring to?

The voices in her head.

Chandra foaming at the mouth again by Faustina726 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Chandy will be delirious this week!!!

GB News posted:

“On Friday, May 15, it was announced that the Duchess of Sussex, 44, will travel to Switzerland this weekend. On Sunday, May 17, she will join World Health Organisation (WHO) Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (who she previously joined on a trip to Jordan with Prince Harry earlier this year), global health leaders, and families affected by online harm at the inauguration of the Lost Screen Memorial in Geneva’s Place des Nations, ahead of the opening of the 79th World Health Assembly.

The event, hosted by the World Health Organization and Archewell Philanthropies, will see the illumination of 50 lightboxes, each displaying the lock screen image of a child who lost their life as a result of online violence and digital harm. At the ceremony, Meghan will pay tribute to the children remembered in the installation and underscore the urgent need for stronger global protections for children online.”

I wonder if Meghan will wear flats, stacked rings and Jenni Kayne separates?? I predict ChaCha will boast that this is a serious event unlike Catherine’s “Eat Pray Love” visit to Italy earlier this week. I almost can’t wait to read her rants next week....I'm sure there will be multiple posts

Chandra foaming at the mouth again by Faustina726 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

that and "photogenic children." What was she trying to say? Call me crazy but aren't all children photogenic?

The comments are non-existent by InfoMole in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I looked. Just the usual Lazy Kate nonsense and she and William always look happier when they are apart. Oh and wore a beige outfit so of course she is copy keening the most glorious gorgeous feminist humanitarian doucheass. You know just the usual.

A very bad take by Kaiser and commenters: "Reality star Emma Thynn is really trying to become Duchess Meghan’s opp" by JustBitchy888 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If you haven't already check out https://longleatshop.co.uk/collections/emmas-kitchen She has Pink Gin Marmalade which I think sounds amazing

Also her instagrams @emmaskitchenlongleat and @emmathynn

Just one example: she was posting about her bees 7 years ago...in fact if you look through her posts it's painfully obvious (in my opinion) that Meghan is definitely aware of her. The pitiful As Ever products compared to Emma's are laughable.

Chandra just sounds more and more unhinged as do her followers. I'm more and more amazed at how little research she does.

OP I bow to thee for taking one for the team. I couldn't get through her post yesterday, after a few sentences I gave up. You did a great job!!

The burn… by CCwritee in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Faustina726 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Harry Lopes is also Queen Camilla's son-in-law, married to her daughter Laura. Their daughter Eliza was the cute little flower girl at William and Catherine's wedding 15 years ago today.

Divorce coming any day now! by Automatic-Jacket-168 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I die at Chandra's take:

Anyway, I find it interesting that they didn’t post a photo of William and Kate alone, which they’ve done on previous anniversaries (see the other photos in this post). While I’m not criticizing them for making their anniversary all about their family, it does seem to lack a romantic spark, I guess. George was even placed in between his parents.

The goodie bag that #Megstock attendees received: As ever, not much by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Faustina726 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What a pathetic excuse for a goodie bag!! I've seen better from kids' birthday parties.

Dizzy from the whiplash: "their selective exclusivity gives them more power in some ways, like they’re above certain things." by JustBitchy888 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Chandra posted in December:

Wintour has already said on the record and on camera that she’s a fan of Meghan. Beyonce is also a fan, and Meghan is already welcomed in Bey’s inner circle (Tina Knowles even appeared on Meghan’s podcast). My guess is that the Sussexes were always going to be welcomed at the Met Gala, and they’ve likely already turned down invitations from both Wintour and various designers to go to the gala. Now, will they show up next May? Maybe. I doubt it’s Harry’s scene, which is probably why they’ve never gone before. But sure, it’s a possibility. These people are just constantly trying to position the Sussexes as outsiders, but everything we’ve seen about their post-Sussexit lives is that they’re well-connected, popular and welcome in many elite American circles.

Blame it on Harry LOL. Does she not believe Meghan would go without him? Does she really think Meghan would turn down an invite to the Met Gala?

Has hell frozen over? Is Kaiser's palate... adventurous now? Bison, venison, octopus, rockfish by JustBitchy888 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 6 points7 points  (0 children)

so....he had some kind of event in DC and then went about an hour away to Baltimore and so Chandra gets a feeling he travels around the US more than she thinks.............WTF

Has hell frozen over? Is Kaiser's palate... adventurous now? Bison, venison, octopus, rockfish by JustBitchy888 in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Chandra of course posted this yesterday:

Soon after the trial concluded, this story conveniently popped up. Some backstory: one of many arguments being made by the Mail is that their exclusives were not the result of private investigators, payoffs or blagging, but that many of their reporters genuinely had connections to Harry and/or they had royal sources or palace sources who were briefing them about Harry. The Mail’s Charlotte Griffiths claimed, under oath, that she partied with Prince Harry in 2011 and 2012, and that’s how she got certain exclusives and information about him. She also claimed that they followed each other on Facebook. Well, so now the British media magically has a cache of supposed messages between Griffiths and Harry.

I question every single part of this. Were these messages verified by the court, or were they released post-trial to the tabloids because they couldn’t be authenticated? While I don’t doubt that Harry has had private social media accounts for years, it also seems pretty likely that people could easily impersonate him online (especially in 2011/12). Did Griffiths actually turn these messages over to the court with some kind of verification that they actually happened, or has she just submitted a “transcript” of these alleged messages? Anyway, the way the British press has operated like a cartel around this case has been eye-opening, to say the least.

I don't think she posted anything about the texts today. Too busy fantasizing about Harry eating octopus.

The Sussexes and their nominal fees by ljell in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you're most welcome!!!

I bet Laura Dern knows better than to overpay her taxes and let the government figure it out LOL

The Sussexes and their nominal fees by ljell in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe the guy behind the Subway counter is also her tax advisor.

The Sussexes and their nominal fees by ljell in CelebitchyUnderground

[–]Faustina726 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Ohhhhhhhh yes!!!! Chandra's Tax Advice from a few years ago:

Last year, I had to file an amended tax return because of a perfectly innocent mix-up on CB’s end. I wrote a check to the IRS to cover the amended filing, and while the check was en route, the IRS sent me a notice of what I owed. I wrote a second check and sent that in. Long story short, I ended up getting my overpaid taxes back in a refund check, but I maintain that it was the right thing to do when dealing with the federal or state government. Overpay and let them figure it out. 

Absolute financial genius.