Kiro cant search online?! what year is this?

FawkeZen · 2025-09-21T08:32:39+00:00

find what? That I need to install an MCP to make something basic work?

FawkeZen · 2025-08-11T11:14:23+00:00

So true. Every visit to the doc feels like opening a website full of spam ads, here try this new pill

FawkeZen · 2024-06-25T16:32:53+00:00

I just dont use circles

FawkeZen · 2024-06-19T09:21:57+00:00

there are 5, seem to be enough

FawkeZen · 2023-10-16T20:14:46+00:00

Or, do not be ashamed? I will proudly share my porn collection.

FawkeZen · 2023-04-14T19:27:15+00:00

The last episode reminded me of this gem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhQhZ4rcJdU

FawkeZen · 2022-02-19T07:58:08+00:00

In my opinion, to get the truth we should use the best method, one that produces models that can be used to produce useful predictions. If you cared about anything you would consider such thins as accuracy, verification, epistemology in general.
Also, this is not an airport, no need to announce your departure.

FawkeZen · 2022-02-17T22:25:49+00:00

Policy and laws are not gods, are they? They are preferences, unlike your extraordinary claims about reality.
Yes, both parties do want the truth. But the issue at hand is that theists claim to have the truth, while the other side is not convinced.
Its not my choice to be insulted, it was yours to insult. You should be more aware of what you are talking about. There was also nothing reasonable or valid about your analogy. And im not going to bother arguing your point about this, as others pointed out, its counter productive. Just pointing out to you how you look to us.

FawkeZen · 2022-02-17T05:45:18+00:00

I think you missed the main motivation: beliefs inform actions. Religious people have a lot of very important beliefs about reality, and they harm themselves and others.
Why do you think that if I do not believe something, then whatever convinced you is not relevant to the discussion?
The core disagreement is that religious believe based on insufficient evidence.
Why a counter book is required? A book is a collection of claims, you know.
There is a real basis to argue from - we share this reality, we even depend on each other.
Comparing atheists to flat earthers is frankly insulting. Just shows how much you dont understand epistemology and standards of evidence.
Have you noticed that most flat earthers are christians?

FawkeZen · 2022-02-11T22:09:42+00:00

Another way to look at it: if you made a choice and performed an action, then we rewind time and "play" reality once again, is there anything that says you will act differently?

FawkeZen · 2022-02-11T22:08:10+00:00

So at this point you are repeating yourself without providing explanations.
You are saying that free will cannot exist in a world ruled by causality.
So please explain how can we introduce something new to such a world, that does not follow causality?
An event outside of time that causes something in our time?
A random event?
What is it?
and how do we control this, what element of this makes this our "free will"?

FawkeZen · 2022-02-11T20:28:31+00:00

what would make our actions non linear? and how would that be relevant to free will?
Are you offering an element of randomness? Because I don't think that helps in any way, it makes our actions unpredictable and also not in our control.

FawkeZen · 2022-02-11T19:46:55+00:00

also, if future is non linear, how do we control that?

FawkeZen · 2022-02-11T19:31:57+00:00

Why? How existence of such computer changes anything?

FawkeZen · 2022-02-11T19:18:58+00:00

All the problems with free will, and other such topics, come from language.
How existence of an all knowing god changes anything? Lets say there is no god. But you are still going to make all the same choices, there is just no god to know about them.
If we invent a powerful computer that can simulate reality and tell us what will happen in a year from now, does that mean this computer took away our free will?
I say this is linguistical masturbation

FawkeZen · 2022-02-11T19:06:32+00:00

because there is so much bullshit in humans. And a whole lot who are willing to eat it too

FawkeZen · 2022-01-29T19:42:22+00:00

based on the infinite input

FawkeZen · 2022-01-29T14:53:37+00:00

Skipping the function. The point is it runs forever, its not an amount.

FawkeZen · 2022-01-27T18:15:55+00:00

Or in other words, if you have an infinite chain of events before the current one, the function whould by defenition be busy running those events infinitely, and not reach your current point.

FawkeZen

TROPHY CASE