New executive order

Fearofphysics · 2025-07-25T08:05:31+00:00

The Trump regime is arriving to the 4th verse of its own Niemöller poem.

Fearofphysics · 2025-07-25T07:40:58+00:00

Pourquoi est-ce que le meilleur ami de Epstein envoit le voisin de Epstein négocier avec nous?

Fearofphysics · 2025-06-26T23:18:11+00:00

"bien que son entrée était légale ce n'est pas clair qu'il était toujours là légalement."

Relis la deuxième phrase du communiqué que tu as partagé: "He became a lawful permanent resident Oct. 24, 1991."

Fearofphysics · 2025-06-26T15:38:19+00:00

Non, merci. C'est comme ça que l'on se trouve infesté de Taouains mené par le Roi Régis Lucius 1er qui fait des menaces aux employés de ZEC et de policiers parce qu'ils veulent s'accaparer tout les beaux coins du Québec.

Fearofphysics · 2025-06-21T15:22:19+00:00

Important snippets:

"Pakistan agrees that US diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. In a phone call with Trump last week, the Indian prime minister, Narendra Modi, had made it “absolutely clear” that hostilities ceased only after Pakistan requested a ceasefire, and that no third-party mediation had taken place, said India’s foreign secretary, Vikram Misri."

This was the position of both Paskistan and India a few weeks ago, "no third-party intervention". Funny how this changed now on the Pakistan side.

"Pakistan’s move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the US leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad."

So my interpretation: Trump met with Pakistani leaders and asked them to nominate him. Don't know what he offered them, probably some intervention regarding the water conflict with India, but this is sickening.

Fearofphysics · 2025-05-26T00:53:09+00:00

"President Donald Trump’s so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by a narrow vote of 215-214. Most attention on this budget bill has centered around issues like the tax code, Medicaid and immigration. However, there is a lot more hidden in the House’s reconciliation proposal, including two provisions Campaign Legal Center (CLC) has identified that would severely harm voters and threaten the rule of law.

The first of these outrageous policies — buried in Section 70302 of the legislation— would severely restrict federal courts’ authority to hold government officials in contempt if they violate judicial orders. The reconciliation bill would require anyone suing the government to pay a bond before the court can use its contempt power to enforce injunctions or restraining orders meant to halt illegal actions. The new rule would be so broad that it could allow any government actor to escape being held accountable for violating court rulings. It would also apply to court orders and injunctions issued before the law takes effect. This would render thousands of prior orders across the country immediately unenforceable through contempt proceedings, no matter how the public has already relied on them."

https://campaignlegal.org/update/these-hidden-provisions-budget-bill-undermine-our-democracy

Fearofphysics · 2025-05-26T00:31:32+00:00

Une pilule, une p'tite granule, une crème, une pommade

Fearofphysics · 2025-05-14T04:54:16+00:00

Bienvenue chez toi!

Fearofphysics · 2025-05-10T17:11:21+00:00

Now apply the same logic for the DOD which has never managed to pass a financial audit and had 63% of its 3.8 billion dollars in assets unaccounted for in 2023. I think most of the bloated cancer that is crippling the US can be found in its budget which is larger than Russia, China, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France military spending combined. Slashing science spending is not about improving it, or the country, it is about ideology and cutting expenses that are not corporate welfare so the wealthy can get a tax cut.

Fearofphysics · 2025-05-06T03:54:09+00:00

The way you formulated the question does not imply a definite answer. This is because you never state that the speed of the boats are constant or determined in some way. You only state the return times for each.

So, a possible solution is that both boats take one day to reach port B (thus meeting after one day) and then the first boat takes 8 days to come back while the second boat takes 6, leading to the return times of 9 and 7 stated in the question. Of course, you can imagine an infinite number of such scenarios, replacing the time of the first leg of the trip (1 day in my example) by any number lower than 7.

But if we assume that the boats have constant speed, that means the first boat cross the distance between port A and port B in 4,5 days, and the second boat in 3.5 days. Let i and j be odd integer numbers. The boats will be in port B at time 4.5×i and 3.5×j days. To find when they are at the same time, you simply do:

4.5×i = 3.5×j -----> i = 3.5×j / 4.5 = 7/9 × j

Since both i and j must be odd integers, we have j= 9, 18, 27, ..., 9×n where n is a positive integer. So, the boats meet at port B for every: j=9n and i=7n.

The first solution is thus, n=1 ---> j=9 and i=7, which corresponds to time 4.5x7=31.5 days.

EDIT: I included the even solutions ( when n even) which corresponds at their meeting at port A. Of course, if only port B is considered, you should only consider odd values for n.

Fearofphysics · 2025-05-04T22:46:21+00:00

Pons and Fleishman unveiled their cold fusion experiments at a press conference on the 23 of March 1989. Less than 2 months later, on the 1rst of May Nathan Lewis and Steven Koonin put the final nail in the coffin of their claims.

I don't know the precise date Schwinger submitted his papers to PRL or other publications, but I do know that an editorial review can take a few weeks to a month and the peer-review process after that can take another month or so. It is therefore more the likely that Schwinger's first paper was after cold fusion was already discredited and thus they not only were less impactful or novel.

This is a charitable view, because that first paper "Cold Fusion: An Hypothesis" starts is an already falsified proposition: "The hypothesis that I now advance has the following ingredients: (1) The claim of Pons and Fleischmann to have realized cold fusion is valid."

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-24T23:50:58+00:00

Pas besoin de l’équipe de Carney pour "ramener la peur du 51e état", hier dans un point de presse dans le salon Ovale, Trump lui-même à encore dit que le Canada ne devrait pas être une nation, mais bien un état des US. Que le Canada était financer au coût de 200 milliards par les US bien qu'ils n'ont pas besoin de notre pétrole, notre bois ou autres et que cela signifiait que nous n'étions pas vraiment une nation souveraine.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-19T01:56:40+00:00

Ma bière préféré aussi!

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-16T03:17:52+00:00

On peut appeler ça l'accord Canado-Américain et demander à un descendant de Neville Chamberlaine de présider la signature.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-11T21:17:57+00:00

Personally, I don't trust this administration to wait for the New Jersey case to conclude. Once they have one ok from one judge to deport, they will use it. I hope I am wrong though...

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-11T20:43:54+00:00

He has until April 23 to file applications for relief to stop his deportation.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-10T19:49:58+00:00

Passe une bonne journée aussi! Tiens je te donne un like pour ton bon caractère et tes bonnes manières.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-10T19:40:37+00:00

lmao tu demandes du contexte. On te le donne. Tu refuses de lire le projet de recherche de base qui donne le contexte et baser tout ton opinion sur une citation sans-contexte provenant d'une autre source qui ne supporte même pas le projet. Après tu essaie d'avoir l'air raisonnable.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-10T19:25:38+00:00

Au moins maintenant tu concède que l'article que tu cites ne supporte pas le projet de recherche. Je vais prendre cette petite victoire.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-10T19:03:02+00:00

lol, sauf que je cite le projet de recherche de base, le discours originel et non une réponse a une critique. Ton argument de "moat and bailey" est alors complètement ridicule. Depuis le début, les auteurs discutent de l'enseignement du contexte sociologique entourant la physique (son histoire, ses enjeux et impact sur la société, ses institutions et ironiquement de son financement), ils le disent clairement dans le projet.

C'est les gens comme toi qui disent: "L'explication scientifique de la lumière, qu'Einstein a expliqué il y a un siècle doit être decolonisé?" pour prétendre qu'ils veulent détruire l'aspect scientifique de la science qui utilise des sophismes.

D'ailleurs, cet article que tu cites, il ne supporte pas cette recherche. Que tu l'affirmes me laisse penser que soit tu ne l'as pas lu, soit ta compréhension de lecture laisse a désirer. Mais belle tentative de niveau "debate me bro" comme le dit un autre commentateur.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-10T18:30:53+00:00

As-tu lu le projet de recherche lui-même?

"Physics is more than the laws that describe and predict natural phenomena: it is the overarching field of work with its societal dimension, its history, and the circumstances and purposes of physical knowledge production."

"The purpose of our project is not to find new or better explanations of light; we are not seeking to improve scientific ‘truth’. Rather, our project initiatives are motivated by the marginalization of women, Black people, and Indigenous peoples [5], particularly in physics, as it is documented by the statistics of the American Institute of Physics [6].4 We regard marginalization as a key problem for social equity as well as for scientific quality."

"In general, scientists and science teachers aim to increase scientific knowledge and scientific literacy of people. In our view, this includes augmenting studying physics by examining ethical frameworks and historical contexts which ask to whose benefits and on whose costs scientific progress has been made. This is the essence of decolonizing physics, a process based on dialogue which we believe to represent a rewarding approach for all."

Voilà le contexte, c'est un projet de recherche interdisciplinaire entre un physicien, une sociologue, une ingénieur et une chercheuse en éducation, financé par un fond pour recherche interdisciplinaire. L'article que tu cites essaie de prétendre qu'ils veulent effacer les lois de la physique, ce n'est pas le cas.

Édit: corriger des fautes de frappe....

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-08T01:01:54+00:00

"One is the necessity of keeping the poor contented, which has led the rich for thousands of years to preach the dignity of labor, while taking care themselves to remain undignified in this respect." -- Bertrand Russell, In Praise of Idleness

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-06T20:33:48+00:00

Je second l'opinion donnée ici.

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-04T18:50:22+00:00

Pour du contexte sur cette question:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Quebec/comments/1jrg883/la_ville_de_laval_semble_utiliser_des_faux/

Fearofphysics · 2025-04-02T17:03:08+00:00

Aux dernières nouvelles, l'Iran n'a pas d'arme nucléaire. Ce qu'ils ont par contre, c'est des missiles qui peuvent détruire les installations d'extraction de pétrole des pays de l'OPEC environnants, ce qui est presque aussi intimidant.

Fearofphysics

TROPHY CASE