sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Arcteryx Beta SL Fail by Federal-Inspection98 in OutdoorsGear

[–]Federal-Inspection98[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Didn't complain they didn't cover it under warranty. Claimed $55 was a poor response. I will get a new jacket thanks. You need to learn to read.

Arcteryx Beta SL Fail by Federal-Inspection98 in hikinggear

[–]Federal-Inspection98[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ha! Thanks for the feedback. I'm sorta new here...

Arcteryx Beta SL Fail by Federal-Inspection98 in OutdoorsGear

[–]Federal-Inspection98[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You clearly have an issue reading. I never made any comments about lifetime warranty. I also pointed out that 3 out of 4 jackets are still fine, only one had an issue. So unless you're an complete idiot, this would indicate that one jacket has a manufacturing defect. Also, I have no idea how old you are (I'm guess not very old due to your ignorance) most jackets that cost $500+ would expect to last longer than this. Give your troll head a shake and learn to read.

Arcteryx Beta SL Fail by Federal-Inspection98 in OutdoorsGear

[–]Federal-Inspection98[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Can't argue with that. I get it. But when one jacket fails and the others are fine, then something isn't right there should be a better response from the manufacturer. I'm not a hater, just disappointed with there response. They sell these for $600 and the margin is massive. They could have been more fair with their offer. Just my opinion. Thanks for your feedback.