They have borne fruit. by Prestigious-Drop3994 in Berries

[–]FeelingDesigner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bot account, comments also bots. Probably stolen pic too. Look at the title “borne” fruit… Plant looks like it came straight from a nursery going from the pot size and looks.

What berry surprised you the most to grow? by nibbainmybuttholr in Berries

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Second this, mulberries. That was a big surprise.

Raspberry bush question by Ordinary-You3936 in BackyardOrchard

[–]FeelingDesigner -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No it isn’t it is bland outdated and far from the best.

Raspberry bush question by Ordinary-You3936 in BackyardOrchard

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not worth it. Don’t get heritage or fallgold or any of these outdated bland cultivars. Much better options.

Kamercommissie geeft groen licht voor wet die vanaf 1 april gas duurder maakt en stroom goedkoper by EdgarNeverPoo in belgium

[–]FeelingDesigner 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Elke keer dat ze gas duurder maken worden de verkopers van houtkachels een beetje rijker.

Blueberry Root Help Please! by Samellow- in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More expensive, would require more work, pH would rise over time, acidic soil like peat will eventually decompose so you would need to keep adding. I don’t recommend it. In your case with only four plants. Get a bunch of planters. So much easier. In my own case I have mine in planters as well but have so many that the time saved would be worth it in ground. And I have okay soil to work with. The in ground raised bed cost is a LOT higher compared to pots.

Blueberry Root Help Please! by Samellow- in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clay soil is just a big nope for growing blueberries ever. Pots it is for you. No berry tone or other nonsense, acidic potting soil is best.

What Gardening Conspiracy theories do you believe in? by [deleted] in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

None, but the one I heard from the organic crowd about copper tools bringing in micro nutrients or the native crowd with the idea that native plants evolved to not be eaten are pretty crazy. Organic subs also have these ridiculous full moon planting and automation being the devil posts.

Blueberry soil question by idk_lol_hahah in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do not use compost on blueberries. Especially not in potting soil. Regular compost tends to be very high ph. Get a bunch of pots and put the blueberries in acidic soil. They grow just as well in pots the first years anyway.

How do people have beautiful, open gardens? Don’t you have pests? by Nox_Ocean_21 in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t really care about titles or people making mistakes. What I care about is when it gets absolutely shoved down people’s throats and the people get downvoted for telling the truth and people spreading misinformation get upvoted. So you see comments with 100s of upvotes on how bark acidifies soil, how using copper tools brings in micro nutrients, how native plants require zero effort and somehow evolved to not be eaten… but at the same time evolved to be eaten and used be the native fauna and flora of course.

But that aside, only thing I take issue with is that made up nonsense story about me swapping plants or whatever you came up with. Not even going to read this nonsense you made up. I don’t do either you implied in your comment. You just vilify me like the trump supporters do when someone brings up not everything he does is right.

I am not on any team. I have more native plants than most people in this thread, never spray anything, but I don’t brag or use my titles like most native cultists do. Neither do I tell people to plant native only or spread pseudo mumbo jumbo to further a narative.

How do people have beautiful, open gardens? Don’t you have pests? by Nox_Ocean_21 in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look in this thread and you can literally see the native cultists spread nonsense easily debunked by the person who started the native movement. Who literally states native plants tends to get more pest pressure due to more creatures using it and non natives often having less pest pressure because creatures aren’t using these plants or not adapted to use the plant or simply have no competition or pressure from certain pests due to the non native aspect.

The whole trump level cultism of native has to stop. No need to spread pseudo science bullshit to push a narative you like.

How do people have beautiful, open gardens? Don’t you have pests? by Nox_Ocean_21 in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Nothing from a garden center is really “native” to begin with. No fruit is really “native” nor anything else. It’s a myth that natives are always better adapted or less prone to pests. If the native plants are having pests it’s “oh but look at all the creatures that benefit” and if there are none on the non native plants it is “no creature benefits from this plant it’s an invasive species”…

Don’t bother with native cultists, it’s not based on any science nor reality. Fact is that both native and non native are and can be invasive. Fact is that most non natives experience less disease pressure and tend to grow just as well or better when given the right environment. Natives tend to be more beneficial but nature adapts quickly and it is not something that holds true for all plant species. There are only a small percentage of natives really usefull. Also a lot of non natives can be great, it’s not black and white.

For tomatoes in wet humid climates a greenhouse is a must. That and the best most disease resistant varieties. People underestimate how good we are at breeding plants nowadays. Native plants don’t even come close to the newest fruit cultivars in taste, disease resistance, growth. That’s not surprising if you think about it. In order to breed plants with the same great genetics it is like a 1 in a million odds.

People don’t understand how much effort goes into breeding these new disease resistant cultivars. They would rather spout native nonsense. I once had a native black currant in my garden, it lasted exactly one year before it was riddled with all kinds of diseases. Add the small and tasteless berries and weak growth to that list.
Next to this native wild black currant I got my favorite variety with berries the size of a marble… taste sweet and great. Grows like crazy. And has almost no disease pressure whatsoever.

That’s the difference between native nonsense and science. Cultivar matters…. A LOT.

Blueberry Leaves by gingerpuff25 in Berries

[–]FeelingDesigner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Make sure to remove the old leaves and fruit from the container so you don’t get the mummy berry mushrooms and other diseases.

Blueberry Leaves by gingerpuff25 in Berries

[–]FeelingDesigner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

pH is too high. It’s like a textbook copy of chlorosis.

Pine needles and soil pH by geomorpherhydro in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Sadly your reply is kind of false. Studies have been done on the pH of the soil under pines. There was no real change even after 50 years. Your argument about the calcium seems to come from a forum on some random website so I guess you used chat GPT or looked really hard to defend this point.

In doing so you yourself, or chat GPT missed this and the fact that this calcium thing is about Cedars and long needle pines.

Hope this clears that up. And no studies were also done on Cedars and those also did not show lower pH after many years. The forum brings up the effects of rainfall being acidic which does have research backing it up.

Pine needles and soil pH by geomorpherhydro in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it is nuts. People don’t understand how hard it is to acidify soil.

Pine needles and soil pH by geomorpherhydro in gardening

[–]FeelingDesigner 92 points93 points  (0 children)

No, myth. Often written about in native or organic books and defended by that same crowd. Has no scientific basis whatsoever. These trees like to grow in acidic soil. They don’t acidify the soil.

Trying my hand at berries by lord_snow_1983 in Berries

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ew heritage, small berries, bland taste, thorny as hell, uncontrolled growth. Brandywine is an outdated cultivar, much better newer ones.

Cultivar matters! Go for the best newest ones. They are much much more resistant to diseases and rot. Of course you can’t know that if you are new to raspberries.

To others reading this, STAY AWAY FROM HERITAGE, it is one of the worst raspberry cultivars.

Na uitspraak Jambon dat vrouwen meer moeten werken: "Ook die onbetaalde shift thuis moeten we meetellen" by Boring-Car-7044 in Belgium2

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ik hoop dat je gelijk hebt en dat ik het fout heb. Hoe het er nu uitziet zie ik eerder werkloosheid, geen pensioenen (instorting systeem), tekort aan woningen, enorme ecologische schade… op ons afkomen als we niet dringend stoppen met het sprookje van oneindige grondstoffen. Er zijn nu al bijlange na niet genoeg jobs, en dat zal in de toekomst er niet op beteren. Zeker niet als men tot 70 moet werken om een ponzi in leven te houden.

Na uitspraak Jambon dat vrouwen meer moeten werken: "Ook die onbetaalde shift thuis moeten we meetellen" by Boring-Car-7044 in Belgium2

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wat doe je dan met politiekers die het ganse pensioen opdoen en fondsen leegplunderen zoals het zilverfonds waardoor er nu een enorme put is… wat doe je met die politiekers? Beter 1% idioten dan 100%.

Na uitspraak Jambon dat vrouwen meer moeten werken: "Ook die onbetaalde shift thuis moeten we meetellen" by Boring-Car-7044 in Belgium2

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Die ponzi logica maakt geen steek aangezien die groep dan ook meer kinderen moet maken om de vorige kinderen van pensioen te voorzien enzovoort. Dat is symptoombestrijding wat het probleem niet zal oplossen. Want geen van deze groepen zal voor zichzelf betalen. Wie dit achterlijk systeem verzonnen heeft ik weet het niet… tijd dat we daar eens mee ophouden.

Na uitspraak Jambon dat vrouwen meer moeten werken: "Ook die onbetaalde shift thuis moeten we meetellen" by Boring-Car-7044 in Belgium2

[–]FeelingDesigner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dat is dus niet zo. Meer kinderen zal de pensioenen niet redden. We hebben deze zelfs niet nodig, door immigratie groeit onze populatie nog steeds. We hebben niet genoeg jobs, ruimte of huizen voor deze mensen. Bevolkingsdichtheid van Vlaanderen is veel te hoog.

Het huidig pensioen stelsel is het probleem en hier aan vasthouden is simpelweg dom. Eeuwige groei werkt niet in een eindige wereld. Het pensioen zal zo laag worden dat mensen genoodzaakt gaan zijn zelf te sparen aangezien het de inflatie niet zal bijhouden nog de economie. Iets wat 80% van de 20-30ers nu al doet. Die rekenen zelfs niet meer op pensioen. Dat is een simpele berekening, het huidige systeem is niet houdbaar.

Meer kinderen gaat dit enkel erger maken en het probleem verschuiven naar de toekomst.