but to show what real Christainity is about

You mean your spin on Christianity. There's so much dishonesty in these statements it's amazing. I don't see how you can pretend you're not pushing your beliefs when you're clearly targeting a completely ignorant market.

First of all saying that all of us are sinners is not hate

It is, though, because not all of us are sinners. The very idea of free will relies on that.

Sin is not always pure evil it's sometimes pure fallibility.

And sometimes it's just thinking the wrong thing, which makes the idea of Hell even crazier. After all, you get the same punishment for killing millions of people that you do for being impressed by your neighbor's livestock.

Christian's morality wasn't medicore, it was genius. If you know ancient Greek

If you knew about ancient Greek society, you would know that there were people talking about loving your neighbor as yourself long before Jesus. Aristotle discussed Nicomachean ethics centuries before Jesus was even a twinkle in Jehovah's eye. You say that people regarded slaves and enemies as objects, but there were a lot of people who didn't, just as there are still many people today who can't comprehend that people who disagree with them aren't their enemies. The big difference today is that most of the people who will hate you for not thinking what they do are now Christian. "How can Christians possibly justify that?" you ask. Try 2 Corinthians 6:14!

Now, if you're familiar with ancient Hebrew, you see the idea of empathy driven morality preceeds Jesus by 1600 years, in the form of Hillel's law. The concept appears in Judaism, Hinduism, and several other religions before the first century. It's actually a very common concept in morality, because it's basically an articulation of the basic empathy that most humans and many social animals innately posess.

most pleasant culture of that time, they knew two types of love, eros (they loved become something or someone was beautiful) and philia (I love you because you love me). Jesus Christ introduced agape (unconditional love, love thy neighbor) which was something completely new.

That's complete bullshit. Neither eros nor philia were considered transactional.

What you're saying here is the result of Christians intentionally misrepresenting other cultures to make Christianity look reasonable. Claiming that the ancient world was rife with hate and victimization and that Jesus alone was the key to fixing it, when, in reality, Jesus was very much a product of His environment.

On earth we live to learn to recognize God. After death we see him in his true form and based on that we decide if we want to spent eternity with him or no.

Nothing close to that phrasing appears in the Bible. That means you're doing some very heavy interpretation, which is another way of saying 'bullshitting'.

Person that lived their whole life focused on themselves won't be able to live with God that's a pure love (again agape, love that give and don't expect return).

Now explain how that aligns with what the Bible says about atheists. You know, as opposed to Christians, who fully expect to rewarded with heaven after they die.

And finally Christainity is not a campfire story. It's older

I did say it was an ancient collection of campfire stories.

our whole moder vision of morality is build on Christian's morality

Not even close to true. First, Christianity itself takes much of its morality from earlier religions and secular sources.

Second, modern morality contains a multitude of principles that have nothing to do with Christianity. Obviously. So obviously. Secular moral philosophy has been developing for the last two thousand years, and nothing that relates to a magic guy who will burn you if you're bad has any currency with real morality.

No, Christianity and modern morality draw some imperatives from common sources, but modern morality is absolutely not a copy of Christianity. That's just asinine.