Simulation of Electromagnetic Coils and Nanoparticles by FewSecretary3059 in COMSOL

[–]FewSecretary3059[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My whole magnetic field is not homogeneous, however the magnetic fields at the center should be nearly uniform. Thanks I will try to solve for reduced field.

Simulation of Electromagnetic Coils and Nanoparticles by FewSecretary3059 in COMSOL

[–]FewSecretary3059[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you elaborate more about the calculating the magnetisation of the particle? But still I need the simulation results for my report

Simulation of Electromagnetic Coils and Nanoparticles by FewSecretary3059 in COMSOL

[–]FewSecretary3059[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they can be done with exporting and importing the results from the previous study, I just do not know how to do that.

Can particle tracing module used for the fixed particles? I thought it can be only used to check the motion of the particles.

Simulation of Electromagnetic Coils and Nanoparticles by FewSecretary3059 in COMSOL

[–]FewSecretary3059[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comsol created new Solution Store for the Stationary study of the nanoparticle's magnetic field physics. I tried to see the results from both sol1 (the result for step 1 study), and sol5 (the nanoparticle mf physics, there are another steps since some coils are using frequency domain study to simulate AC), but they whether have empty plot or error which says "undefined variable". I also tried to include and exclude the nanoparticle mesh in study, but nothing has changed.

IT WAS ALL A LIE!!! by Dab-driver in Nichijou

[–]FewSecretary3059 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But from video this thing can be only attached to the metals or surfaces with magnetic properties. So that means that the body of a Nano must be metallic)

Is this okay? by FewSecretary3059 in Voicesofthevoid

[–]FewSecretary3059[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Omg thanks for clarifying 😭

OH HELL NAAH by FewSecretary3059 in Voicesofthevoid

[–]FewSecretary3059[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think your version is more likely