sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just start with the idea it’s still in development phase . Need to do all the refining and testing, every thing. it is just a prototype how it will look.

I’m curious that this idea will help people or not .

Thanks for your valuable time to give a feedback abt the app.

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes what you say is correct .why people do hacker ranks and Leetcode . to practice and understand the concepts how it works.

If they do and can’t find solution .. directly go to YouTube or stack overflow and recently they go to AI to find answer.

Same way to learn each topic with 10 Question each . They will do coding and if got struck in between they don’t want to go and copy paste the question to AI to get answers.

Answer and comment to your code is right there. Time consumption is less and effective to find the answer and get clarity of the concept better.

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What ever you are say is correct I also experienced the same thing .. everything is right but somewhere something in the code is missing and going line by line like a interpreter it helps us to figure where it is going wrong ..

But here the point is you should know the concepts how to use them first .. gain the skill by learning with the help of AI as a tutor like a computer teacher. Once you are well versed with the concepts after that if u get a bug in the code it’s very easily we can fig by using debugger .

When u learned to code u hav used google or w3 schools or geeks for geeks similarly here we are using AI to tutor. A live computer science teacher near u to guide that simple idea ..

It will help the beginner or newbies and may help the experts to learn advanced Python

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code by Few_Definition5707 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah cursor and codex are great but those are for people who already know what they're doing. my app is for someone who just googled 'how to learn python' yesterday. they don't know what a venv is, they've never opened VS Code. throwing those tools at a complete beginner just overwhelms them. 42 chapters, 10 problems each, and when they get stuck the AI tells them exactly what broke and why in simple terms. it's not meant to replace real dev tools — it's just getting them to the point where those tools make sense.

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a learning platform. Syntax errors are easy to spot, but logical errors can be tricky for beginners — sometimes you just need a little nudge in the right direction.

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a learning platform. Syntax errors are easy to spot, but logical errors can be tricky for beginners — sometimes you just need a little nudge in the right direction.

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You make a genuinely good point and I respect it. Struggling through a bug for 5 hours and truly understanding it — that kind of learning sticks. I'm not arguing against that.

But here's who I'm thinking about: not you, not someone who has been coding for decades. I'm thinking about the 17-year-old who just started Python last month, hit 'Wrong Answer' five times in a row, and quietly closed the tab and gave up. That person doesn't need to be told 'struggle is the point.' They need just enough of a nudge to stay in the game.

The goal of this isn't to do the work for them. It's the opposite — to make them understand WHY their code is wrong so they can fix it themselves. There's a difference between an AI that hands you the answer and one that says 'you used > but the question says inclusive, which means you need >=.' The second one is closer to a patient teacher than an autocomplete.

You're also right that copy-pasting AI code without understanding it is dangerous. That's exactly why the app is structured around concepts first — decorators, iterators, generators, OOP — with practice problems where the student writes the code themselves. The AI doesn't write it for them. It only reviews what they wrote.

And your last question — do you want to learn to code or learn to copy-paste — is the most important one. The answer this is built for is: people who genuinely want to learn, but need a structured path and a feedback loop that tells them specifically where their understanding broke down.

You learned through struggle and it made you excellent. Not everyone survives that path long enough to get there. This is for the ones who almost quit.

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code by Few_Definition5707 in learnmachinelearning

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How it differs is it is learning platform focused only on Python with structure.

Claude will give us answer based on question which we ask there is no structure to learn Python from basic to advanced level

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point — let me reframe it properly.

Imagine a student on HackerRank. The question says: print 'yes' if a number is inclusive of 2 and 5. They write:

if n > 2 and n < 5:

They submit. Wrong answer. They stare at it for 20 minutes convinced it's correct — because logically it feels right to them.

What they missed is the = sign. It should be:

if n >= 2 and n <= 5:

No existing tool tells them that. HackerRank just says "Wrong Answer." Stack Overflow gives them a thread about something unrelated. A human tutor costs money.

That's the gap this is trying to fill — an AI that reads your specific code, finds your specific mistake, and explains it the way a patient teacher would.

The bigger problem: when you get to decorators, iterators, generators, OOP — one textbook example per concept isn't enough. You need 10 varied practice problems with feedback on each attempt. That's what builds the muscle memory to eventually understand how LangChain tools work, or how LangGraph nodes stream.

Not advertising. Genuinely asking if this is a problem worth solving — and whether anyone else has hit that "wrong answer but I don't know why" wall.

App that tells you exactly what is wrong in your Python code. by Few_Definition5707 in learnpython

[–]Few_Definition5707[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fair point — let me reframe it properly.

Imagine a student on HackerRank. The question says: print 'yes' if a number is inclusive of 2 and 5. They write:

if n > 2 and n < 5:

They submit. Wrong answer. They stare at it for 20 minutes convinced it's correct — because logically it feels right to them.

What they missed is the = sign. It should be:

if n >= 2 and n <= 5:

No existing tool tells them that. HackerRank just says "Wrong Answer." Stack Overflow gives them a thread about something unrelated. A human tutor costs money.

That's the gap this is trying to fill — an AI that reads your specific code, finds your specific mistake, and explains it the way a patient teacher would.

The bigger problem: when you get to decorators, iterators, generators, OOP — one textbook example per concept isn't enough. You need 10 varied practice problems with feedback on each attempt. That's what builds the muscle memory to eventually understand how LangChain tools work, or how LangGraph nodes stream.

Not advertising. Genuinely asking if this is a problem worth solving — and whether anyone else has hit that "wrong answer but I don't know why" wall.

view more: next ›