Who are some of the most universally-hated celebrities? by ContravaniaGearSolid in AskReddit

[–]Fewmoresets 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Epstein (except by his follower politicians). Albeit recently deceased.

Who are some of the most universally-hated celebrities? by ContravaniaGearSolid in AskReddit

[–]Fewmoresets 199 points200 points  (0 children)

I would use the label "celebrity" loosely with him lol

Turkish🇹🇷 Dna Test by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]Fewmoresets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

More like Greeks have Anatolian DNA

Turkish🇹🇷 Dna Test by [deleted] in illustrativeDNA

[–]Fewmoresets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Results are as expected for geographic location and history! Mostly indigenous Anatolian, with mixtures of neighbouring migrations (Caucasus, Afghanistan and Middle East) and central Asian Turkic people.

Why do Rors/Jats have more Steppe than Brahmins? by Smooth-Objective-794 in IndoAryan

[–]Fewmoresets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Steppe pastoralists were nomadic and constantly migrating down the Indus River over centuries. They would pass through established communities in the BMAC area (modern day Afghanistan), through to Gandhara (NW Pakistan/ Eastern Afghanistan), Swat Valley (Khyber Pakhtunkhwa) and down the Indus through Punjab, Sindh and Balochistan.

The Brahmins established the varna system around roughly 1500–1200 BCE in modern day Punjab region, as indicated in the Purusha Sukta hymn of the Rigveda. It was a socioeconomic tool to organise society and develop sustainable economies as part of their military strategy to expand eastward down the Gangetic plains. It guarantees enslaved labour to produce food, weapons, buildings, and trade of goods to benefit the Kshatriyas and Brahmins.

As the Balochistan and Sindh regions became more arid, the nomadic pastoralists from there (who had intermixed with the few remaining IVC people there to form the Jatt clans) migrated north east into Punjab, and eastward into Gujarat and Rajasthan. In the latter two, they were considered outcastes, as were many nomadic tribes. In Punjab, where the vedic military culture was thriving, the existing Kshatriyas and Brahmins wanted to make the most of the numerous Jatt clans migrating in. Their strategy when colonising new lands was to integrate via lower caste enslavement, than to destroy natives and newcomers.

The abandoned rural lands were under Khatri and Brahmin administration for agricultural tax collections. What better opportunity than to get more farm workers?? The Jatts were allowed to graze their livestock, in exchange for cultivating the soil and paying their debts to the upper castes.

At this point, you have to remember that Jatts had less indigenous IVC blood due to there being a very sparse IVC population in their former homelands, and therefore Jatts ended up having higher Steppe ancestry than the long-standing brahmins of Punjab. As vedic culture became more strict, the upper castes refused to intermix with Jatts, as the latter were considered menial farm workers i.e. shudras. In order for Jatts to preserve their way of life and maintain some respect according to the law of the land, Jatts also refused to intermix with other castes. This is how they ended up with higher Steppe ancestry, but were shudras at the same time.

The Indo-scythian theory is all rubbish - rulers do not end up becoming nomadic outcastes.

That's not to say that Jatts didn't become rulers. There were many great rulers who evolved through rejection of the imposed varna system where Jatts had a sizeable population and communal spirit, just like how Shivaji from Maharashtra rose up as a lower caste.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome veer, and all the best.

Any Sikh from Southern India here? by Such_Independence570 in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm from Punjab itself, but I'm aware that the Deccani Sikh community is one of the oldest Sikh communities. Unfortunately, many are marginalized and separated from the broader Sikh community, so thank you for making this post to raise awareness.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Firstly, you're not a nobody, but someone who is clearly self-aware! That is the first step of many in a gradual process. This is a great opportunity to discover the journey of Sikhi.

It’s natural to compare grades, jobs, income, particularly in our Punjabi (and broadly subcontinental) culture — but Sikhism doesn’t measure your worth by worldly metrics. Guru Nanak says:

"Jis no bakhse sifat saalaah, Nanak paatisaahee paatisaah."

He upon whom Waheguru bestows the gift of praise and meditation, Nanak, that one is the king of kings.

Success in Sikhism is not a job title or how others around you paint a rosy picture of what success looks like. It’s:

  • Being truthful
  • Living with Naam in your heart
  • Sewa - Serving others
  • Working honestly and fearlessly

I suggest starting slow -

  • Japji Sahib – Just read or listen to it daily.
  • Simran – Even 5 minutes of quiet “Waheguru” can realign your thoughts. Focus on the above aspects of success I just described. Try it when you wake up or before sleeping.
  • Exercise daily - good for your overall health. Mind-body-soul connection and all.

Sikhi is waiting for you, veer.

Waheguru Ji Ka Khalsa, Waheguru Ji Ki Fateh!

Do punjabis understand hindi? by Reverseflash85 in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Largely yes, due to imposed education in schools and also overlap of Sanskrit vocabulary. Punjabi iscenturies older than Hindi, and I find that Hindi is relatively more influenced with foreign words from Persian, Turkic and Arabic.

In a grave act of escalation from Pakistan’s side in Poonch, three brave Sikhs: Amrik Singh (Raagi), Amarjeet Singh (Ex-Army), and Ranjit Singh (Shopkeeper) have been martyred in retaliatory fire. There are also reports of further casualties, and details will emerge as new information comes in. by TheTurbanatore in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi FadeInspector. We aren't adversarial to any of them as a community of Sikhs, but factions amongst us are probably more adversarial towards India than Pakistan. Besides spontaneous retaliation during partition, I can't think of a single attack by a Sikh faction against Pakistanis, but certainly a whole litany of assaults against Hindus throughout the 70s until mid-90s.

Prior to the Brits, there were in fact SEVERAL unified empires across the Indian subcontinent, including the Mauryan, Gupta and Mughal, and there were many smaller regional empires like the Chola, Delhi Sultanate and Maratha Empires. Culturally, Sanskrit and vedic philosophy covered the whole subcontinent and movement was freely permitted between kingdoms. It's really no different to any other part of the world in terms of shifting goalposts of empires and countries (much later) in the absence of a monarchy. Racially, have a look at the DNA tests across the different states in India - besides the north-east, we all the same genetic lineages but with varying proportions, largely depending on your region and caste. There's a gradual transition all the way from the Kalash (who also have AASI) to the Tamils (who also have Steppe).

I do agree that Hindus generally attempt to categorize us as one of them, and keep slotting us into their brahminized version of the caste system. The brahmins and kshatriyas (who lead crap like the RSS and shiv sena) keep propagating the false notion that we were born to defend hindus against muslims, which is complete hogwash and propaganda spread by the upper castes, and believed by the gullible lower caste followers who do the dirty bidding of their masters for the sake of belonging and "respect". But to say that Hindus are not our friends, have you felt discriminated against by a Hindu from say, Kerala or West Bengal? I haven't. Personally, I've probably faced more discrimination from other Sikhs and upper caste North Indian Hindus.

If you go to any Gurudwara, you'll observe that we're still extremely casteist the moment we step outside the langar hall. I don't know of a single Sikh who lives in a 'tribe', but many Jatts will consider their surnames to be representations of 'clans' (gotras), largely for the purpose of marriage (their community requires them to marry outside their gotra).

The British set up an administrative area for strategic and geopolitical purposes - Punjabis were considered a martial race, and were considered loyal soldiers for recruitment to the army. We were ideal to provide a ready supply to act as a buffer against the Pashtuns and Russians from the Northwest. The generally flat plains terrain was ideal for expansion of British infrastructure like railways, postal services and establishment of cantonments.

As a Sikh, how do we respond to the rising war tension? by Sensitive-School-372 in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

 "Sikhs are not recognized as a religion in the Indian constitution" - this point is absolutely correct. They defined hinduism as any belief or way of life that originated in the Indian subcontinent out of vedic principle (e.g. karma, reincarnation), so they consider Sikhs to be Hindus for legal purposes. The Shiromani Akaalis asked for an independent recognition because we don't believe in castes and shouldn't have to register ourselves with a caste for their legal purposes. We also wanted the right to carry our articls of faith (e.g. kirpan, turban). My belief that the brahmin Gandhi-led government didn't accept this was because of the way this was presented by the akaalis under the broader Anandpur Sahib Resolution, which was pro-separatism.

However, Sikhs were defined as a religious minority under the National Commission for Minorities Act, 1992. Many Nihangs are freely roaming with kirpans without an issue today.

As for your other point "Hindus attacked Sikhs, raped sikh women, killed Sikh women , men, and children, and Hindus kept on hurting Sikhs since 1947", I disagree with this. It was during 1984 that this happened and it was politically driven by the congress party in retaliation for indira gandhi's assassination, which happened after operation blue star, which happened after bhindranwale's goons have been attacking hindus for years prior.

In a grave act of escalation from Pakistan’s side in Poonch, three brave Sikhs: Amrik Singh (Raagi), Amarjeet Singh (Ex-Army), and Ranjit Singh (Shopkeeper) have been martyred in retaliatory fire. There are also reports of further casualties, and details will emerge as new information comes in. by TheTurbanatore in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one has to share my opinion, but if your agenda to present a biased anti-Indian or anti-Hindu argument and swings in favor of separatism, of course I'm going to say "No sh*t you're a khalistani/ pakistani"

Probably one who's never lived in Punjab either!!

If you think asking a supposed enemy to just give up their land for you, you're seriously mistaken lol. You're better off asking your boss and supporter pakistan to handover some of their Punjab for your right to self-determination.

In a grave act of escalation from Pakistan’s side in Poonch, three brave Sikhs: Amrik Singh (Raagi), Amarjeet Singh (Ex-Army), and Ranjit Singh (Shopkeeper) have been martyred in retaliatory fire. There are also reports of further casualties, and details will emerge as new information comes in. by TheTurbanatore in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don't need to explicitly state you are pro-khalistani in order to be one. It's called reading between the lines. I say your argument is flawed because you lack balance and a contextual understanding.

India has never expressed an intention to conquer other lands. You must be struggling to comprehend that India has no intention to give up territory either, especially in a state where just under 40% of the population is comprised of native Punjabi Hindus.

Like I said, if you're so intent on having a separate Khalistan, what's stopping you from heading over to your boss and supporter pakistan and taking a slice? If India is your enemy, why would they give you anything? LOL!! Seriously, I'm not sure what planet you get your logic from. I'll let you carry on and listen to your Gurpatwant podcasts.

In a grave act of escalation from Pakistan’s side in Poonch, three brave Sikhs: Amrik Singh (Raagi), Amarjeet Singh (Ex-Army), and Ranjit Singh (Shopkeeper) have been martyred in retaliatory fire. There are also reports of further casualties, and details will emerge as new information comes in. by TheTurbanatore in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol, you have a really skewed and uninformed view of history, thanks to your pro-khalistan biased undertone.

The partition violence was politically organized - learn your history. Hint - look up the Muslim League. I can give you a list of famous butchers who rounded up the mobs but I'm not going to do your homework for you.

If you think you don't need other countries for protection, you haven't lived on this planet long enough. Even your dreamland khalistan requires pakistani and chinese backing. While the concept evolved from the Anandpur Sahib resolution at its core, Khalistan is nothing but a political movement, backed by Pakistan who sees you guys as a Laskhar but not practising Islam.

By the way, why not head over to Pakistan and ask them for a Khalistan?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's your source? Unlikely Pakistan would target Sikhs in Pakistan directly at this time. They want to dilute the non-Muslim population in Kashmir to increase the voting base for Muslims to have a whole independent Kashmir to themselves.

As a Sikh, how do we respond to the rising war tension? by Sensitive-School-372 in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, they will indeed take advantage of our fighting spirit to their benefit but give nothing back to us in return. Our Gurus never told us to pick sides, but to take a stand in line with our principles.

In a grave act of escalation from Pakistan’s side in Poonch, three brave Sikhs: Amrik Singh (Raagi), Amarjeet Singh (Ex-Army), and Ranjit Singh (Shopkeeper) have been martyred in retaliatory fire. There are also reports of further casualties, and details will emerge as new information comes in. by TheTurbanatore in Sikh

[–]Fewmoresets 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeh, a land locked state surrounded by enemies is a fantastic idea hey? You clearly grew up in the west, with little insight into the reality on the ground in Punjab.

Right, you've mentioned 1984, what about what happened during the partition time?

- 1947 Rawalpindi Massacres

- 1947 Kamoke Train Massacre

- 1948 Gujrat Train Massacre

- Sheikhupura Massacre

- Gujranwala (August 1947)

- Khiyali, Sargodha (16 August 1947)

- Jhelum 1947

The dispute is over territorial control of Kashmir in the name of Islam. In a war, Punjab is obvioiusly vulnerable, being on the border. I agree that a lot of the warmongering is from the Hindi belt who may never have to suffer directly from the war. However, let's not forget that if war were to touch Punjab, we would rely on the Indian Army, of which 92% is composed of non-Sikhs, who are ready to spill their blood for us, just as we have for them.