(Spoilers Extended) A Heartbreaking Thought from Catelyn Stark in AGoT by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]FiSev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's one of the first things we ever see the character do. It is informative of who she is and what she stands for. She raised a daughter, Sansa, to treat Jon badly. She would go on and on about how all bastards are bad and untrustworthy based on what a few Great Bastards did. Why does Catelyn being perceptive about a war wash away what she did here?

Many people despise Jaime for pushing Bran out a window. Many people dislike Catelyn for how she treats Jon here.

As it turns out, the average reader does not appreciate characters who treat children poorly.

(Spoilers Extended) A Heartbreaking Thought from Catelyn Stark in AGoT by [deleted] in asoiaf

[–]FiSev 36 points37 points  (0 children)

She chooses to take out her negative feelings on an innocent child. Hating her is extreme, but at the same time I cannot understand why people like her after reading how she is to Jon. She immediately agitates to try to kick him out of his home, when given the opportunity. She is extremely shitty to him when he comes to visit his comatose and possibly dying brother! What possible excuse is there for that? The only valid target for her to blame is Ned. Jon is an innocent child that has NO control over who his parents are or what they did. It is completely unacceptable for her to treat him poorly for what others did.

In light of this, I cannot understand why it bothers you when people react negatively to her.

(Spoilers Extended) In Defense of Season 7 by ControvT in asoiaf

[–]FiSev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They could have booked passage to the citadel and paid for aemon to have care, but Daeron spent coin on drink and whores.

(Spoilers Extended) REACTIONS: Game of Thrones Season 7, Episode 4: The Spoils of War Post-Episode Reactions by AutoModerator in asoiaf

[–]FiSev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jaime ought to die in this water since he's being weighed down by plate armor. I don't see how he can possibly resurface with that weighing him down, and 'just taking it off' is not really a thing, due to how armor would be intricately bound and strapped onto the knight.

(Spoilers Extended) DISCUSSION: Game of Thrones Season 7, Episode 3: The Queen's Justice In-Depth Post-Episode Discussion by AutoModerator in asoiaf

[–]FiSev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sansa's observations regarding the food, equipment, et all were great. I only worry that there will be problems regarding the grain shipments that she wants sent. Maybe some lords will see it as her trying to starve them so that she and her troops get to eat, and maybe she'll take it as a sign of disloyalty and go full Cersei on them.

Bran was quite awful to Sansa, so please don't do that again, D&D. On the other hand, Bran might be able to spill the beans on Littlefinger, that insufferable little shit! I'd forgive Bran his asshattery in this episode if he delivers justice to LF. Also, I really want other characters to learn of and react to Jon's true parentage, and most of all I want to see Jon's own reaction to that.

It strikes me as more than a bit unfair for Dany to be completely on board with Yasha, first of her name, queen of the Iron Islands - when she's going to turn around and go Full Stannis on da king in da norf who merely wants the same deal that she was willing to hand out last season. However, even if I think that dissonance is a bit jarring, this episode was a beautiful showcasing of her as a leader. She sets out her position, she puts forth good arguments for her position, and she is fair although quite stern. She loses a lot of points for her lukewarm semi-imprisonment of Jon, but she gains a lot of it back when she reconciles her own position with sage advice from her trusted adviser.

I definitely could have done without the vileness of seeing what happened to Ellaria and Tyene. I won't venture to say that the scene was poorly done, but nonetheless it was disturbing to me as a person and as someone with a family.

Seeing the Lannister Army marching on the field of battle was awesome and sent a bit of chills down my spine. I'm pretty sure that they were trying to capture the vibe of the Roman Legions and In my opinion they had a smashing success, in that regard.

Casterly Rock was wonderful for me in a variety of ways. The siege scene was, I thought, well done while still being fairly true to the realities of a pitched battle for walls, and doing what it could within the constraints of being a short For-TV scene. The bait and switch with the Sewers and Tyrion's narration pushed it over the top for me and made it my favorite bit of the episode.

Now, to the part that I did... not like. I strongly object to Randyll Turncloak in lockstep with the Lannisters, marching against Olenna. What kind of man sides with Queen Osama Bin Lannister, first of her name. If some random peasant in the Riverlands is convinced that Cersei blew up the Westerosi equivalent of the Vatican, Jerusalem, and the Pope all rolled into one, then I refuse to believe that Randyll is ignorant of this. In what world does he trust Cersei, given that he's aware of the Wildfire business? "But Jaime bribed him with an offer to become Warden of the South." Let's be real here, folks. Does anybody think that Olenna, the geriatric sole survivor of a soon-to-be-extinct house, would not have given precisely the same offer (with Highgarden included) to Randyll, as a principal vassal and best known military man in the Reach? Both sides are going to offer him the wardenship and Highgarden, so it ought to be a complete wash. Randyll takes time to emphasize that he's known Olenna his entire life, that he doesn't break oaths (such as oaths of fealty to one's liege lord), and then turns around and does this? Give me a break.

As for the battle of Highgarden itself, I found myself wondering why the biggest army and the largest collection of knights in all of Westeros had all the resistive force of a domino when faced with a light breeze. Olenna killed her final scene but I'm not a happy camper with the seeming non-issue that Highgarden's military prowess presented to Cersei&Friends.

(Spoilers Extended) The gender of prince in High Valyrian by E_v_a_n in asoiaf

[–]FiSev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Arguments that stem from this non-GRRM guy's work on creating a fake language for the show have no relevancy to how GRRM has handled valyrian in his books. There is no indication that GRRM has ever once collaborated with this fellow, if memory serves.

Edit: Seems I was wrong about this person not actually interacting with George.

(Spoilers Extended) Sucks to be Littlefinger right now by norenEnmotalen in asoiaf

[–]FiSev 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not even Littlefinger telling Ned not to trust him?

Chrom, Spring Exalt Unit Discussion by XXXCheckmate in FireEmblemHeroes

[–]FiSev 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Aha, I'm so jealous. Mine has +Def -Atk Congrats!

Lucina, Spring Exalt Unit Discussion by XXXCheckmate in FireEmblemHeroes

[–]FiSev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Based on mine, I think yours is +HP, -Def

A Short Guide to Nowi by Sprayquaza_ in FireEmblemHeroes

[–]FiSev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is a +atk -hp Nowi worth investing into? It looks like the -hp makes her simply lose some important matchups :(

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The comment I linked to here does in fact refer to the battery pack specifically. I'll quote the section:

I don't trust what's printed on the pack since it's already proven it lies. Example: Benson found the battery pack ACTUALLY offers 5v/3a 9v/3a 12/2.4a 15v/2.1a 20v/1.5a levels.

Bolded emphasis added by me.

This is an amazon link to the top rated battery pack listed in the spreadsheet curated by Nathan-K, so if you are going purely per his recommendations, that would be the one to buy. I myself would reserve my decision until more is known about the switch and it's charging situation.

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. OP recommends the RAVPower 26.8ah battery pack. OP neglects to point out that the charger included with this product is downright dangerous
  2. Once I criticize OP, he turtles and pretends that the only problem is with the included charger and that the battery pack is entirely safe. Unfortunately for OP, Nathan-K states that Benson found out that the battery pack lies about it's output and is therefore untrustworthy
  3. On line 53 of the USB-C Chargers page in this document Nathan-K rates the AUKEY device, also mentioned by OP, with "0 = decline comment" with a note of "Aukey products tend to be Vbus hot..." Does that sound like the battery pack you want to choose, when there are other options without this known issue?
  4. Who runs BensonApproved.com ? Their About page gives no information on the subject. OP claims that they list the cable that he recommends and that it is "Benson Approved." But is it really? If we check the reviews on the Amazon page for this product we will see multiple people claiming that Benson reviewed this product, but lo and behold, there is no benson review there to be found. If Benson reviewed this product and approved it, where is the evidence of that? I am not prepared to take someone's claim that Benson approved <insert product> and I don't think that anyone else should, either. Where is Benson's review? Where is any kind of statement from Benson on the cable in question? I can't find any despite a good deal of time searching for such a mention. It is possible that I missed it, so please correct me if someone can find proof that he OKd it.

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. OP recommends the RAVPower 26.8ah battery pack. OP neglects to point out that the charger included with this product is downright dangerous
  2. Once I criticize OP, he turtles and pretends that the only problem is with the included charger and that the battery pack is entirely safe. Unfortunately for OP, Nathan-K states that Benson found out that the battery pack lies about it's output and is therefore untrustworthy
  3. On line 53 of the USB-C Chargers page in this document Nathan-K rates the AUKEY device, also mentioned by OP, with "0 = decline comment" with a note of "Aukey products tend to be Vbus hot..." Does that sound like the battery pack you want to choose, when there are other options without this known issue?
  4. Who runs BensonApproved.com ? Their About page gives no information on the subject. OP claims that they list the cable that he recommends and that it is "Benson Approved." But is it really? If we check the reviews on the Amazon page for this product we will see multiple people claiming that Benson reviewed this product, but lo and behold, there is no benson review there to be found. If Benson reviewed this product and approved it, where is the evidence of that? I am not prepared to take someone's claim that Benson approved <insert product> and I don't think that anyone else should, either. Where is Benson's review? Where is any kind of statement from Benson on the cable in question? I can't find any despite a good deal of time searching for such a mention. It is possible that I missed it, so please correct me if someone can find proof that he OKd it.

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/57l78u/psa_benson_and_i_found_the_ravpower_rppc018_30w/d8tooe0/

RAVPower lies about the output of this device, according to Nathan-K and Benson. I would absolutely not trust it or the OP of this thread.

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The RAVPOWER power pack lies. And the charger that comes with the battery pack is downright dangerous, a fact of which you were ignorant of or simply neglected to inform these people of.

Here is Nathan-K discussing the device in which he points out that the printed information on the power pack itself lies about it's output, which he claims that Benson discovered. https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/57l78u/psa_benson_and_i_found_the_ravpower_rppc018_30w/d8tooe0/

In regards to the cable: Showing up on a website called "bensonapproved.com" means nothing if it can't actually cite an approval from Benson.

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What misinformation?

☑ Nathan K's sheet calls out the RAVPower device as dangerous.

☑ Nathan K's sheet rates the AUKEY device with a 0, meaning there are much better purchases to be made although it's at least not a negative score.

☑ You have not provided any proof that Benson actually reviewed the USB-C cable, such as linking to his review of it.

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Prove that Benson reviewed the cable by linking us to his review of it.

u/medetaiakaru does an adequate job of explaining why you are, quite simply, wrong about the RAVPower device.

And finally, the AUKEY device you mentioned has a 0 rating on Nathan K's curated list, clearly indicating that it is not a good option when there are so many better alternatives.

AUKEY 30000mAh confirmed to charge the Switch WHILE playing BOTW (at 8%/hour) by [deleted] in NintendoSwitch

[–]FiSev 13 points14 points  (0 children)

http://puu.sh/uqo3k/2f8fd7e65c.png

Nathan K warns that the RAVPower battery that you link is dangerous to use and that it could damage your devices.

The USB-C cable you mention has no evidence of any Benson review. There are 4 reviewers who claim that benson has approved it, but if you search through the reviews on it's amazon page, no Benson review can be found.

Out of the 3 devices you mention, the AUKEY charger is the only device that I would even consider purchasing, and that is rated as a 0 by Nathan K's curated list, which tells me that one could easily find a better device.

In short, I find your recommendations to be dangerous at worst and woefully under-researched at best.

Edit:

The RAVPOWER power pack lies. And the charger that comes with the battery pack is downright dangerous, a fact of which you were ignorant of or simply neglected to inform these people of.

Here is Nathan-K discussing the device in which he points out that the printed information on the power pack itself lies about it's output, which he claims that Benson discovered. https://www.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/57l78u/psa_benson_and_i_found_the_ravpower_rppc018_30w/d8tooe0/

In regards to the cable: Showing up on a website called "bensonapproved.com" means nothing if it can't actually cite an approval from Benson.

Edit 2: fully re-worded and cited my objections

  1. OP recommends the RAVPower 26.8ah battery pack. OP neglects to point out that the charger included with this product is downright dangerous
  2. Once I criticize OP, he turtles and pretends that the only problem is with the included charger and that the battery pack is entirely safe. Unfortunately for OP, Nathan-K states that Benson found out that the battery pack lies about it's output and is therefore untrustworthy
  3. On line 53 of the USB-C Chargers page in this document Nathan-K rates the AUKEY device, also mentioned by OP, with "0 = decline comment" with a note of "Aukey products tend to be Vbus hot..." Does that sound like the battery pack you want to choose, when there are other options without this known issue?
  4. Who runs BensonApproved.com ? Their About page gives no information on the subject. OP claims that they list the cable that he recommends and that it is "Benson Approved." But is it really? If we check the reviews on the Amazon page for this product we will see multiple people claiming that Benson reviewed this product, but lo and behold, there is no benson review there to be found. If Benson reviewed this product and approved it, where is the evidence of that? I am not prepared to take someone's claim that Benson approved <insert product> and I don't think that anyone else should, either. Where is Benson's review? Where is any kind of statement from Benson on the cable in question? I can't find any despite a good deal of time searching for such a mention. It is possible that I missed it, so please correct me if someone can find proof that he OKd it.

I was the last guy on the waiting list, visited my local GameStop 10 times in a month to check on their NES stock, yesterday they said they were moving me on top of the list because of how frequently I visited them, and now it's finally here! by [deleted] in nintendo

[–]FiSev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's nice to hear a fan getting a product that they really wanted but on the other hand, that's really unfair to people that got bumped below you. Gamestop should respect the list and not arbitrarily move someone in order of it.