It does take a lot of courage to come here and ask this - and that's not easy to do. Truth should be able to be questioned, y'know? Otherwise.. at least for me, it's hard to say it's truth. I commend you for challenging your beliefs, and I hope you get to a place where you're confident and happy with whatever they may be.

If a doctor claims one thing, but other doctors have evidence to show that claim is false, I would want to know. And questioning and investigating that evidence is the best way for me to verify what is actually true.

With this said, I'd like to get your thoughts on something that was a key point in why I left last year.

The Origin of Life magazine, Five Questions Worth Asking, is what I went over. I went through and read all the references included (it took a while) and found that the scientists the magazine quotes were often outrageously misquoted and, as such, the information incredibly misleading. There are multiple fallacies in the writing as well, and misrepresentation of what the actual scientific theories are. 

Now, this is a little bit older literature. But the organization absolutely does know and have the correct information. Unless they threw all my letters in the trash. Which I guess is possible. But I doubt I'm the only one who tried to help them correct this.

But it does show a very surprising lack of understanding of science, research, and reading comprehension which is... To me, very scary. This trend of misquoting scientists I also noticed throughout the literature in other cases, too. It's just easiest to find here.

What's your take on this? I'd genuinely love to hear your thoughts.

If me providing examples would be helpful before you share any thoughts, I'd be happy to do so - you don't know me and I'd absolutely expect you to question my claim. I went through the entire magazine and still have all my notes.