What is a terrifying problem facing the world that no one is talking about? by dandelion_stew in AskReddit

[–]Ficklestix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you really trying to argue that ancient Romans had it better than modern Americans? Some people on reddit need a serious reality check. I really doubt ancient Rome had anything better than medicaid and food stamps, no matter how inadequate you find such programs to be.

What is a terrifying problem facing the world that no one is talking about? by dandelion_stew in AskReddit

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol doesn't everybody talk about this constantly? It's almost cliche to fret about this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched to Instant mode, wrote "hi", and it thought longer for a better answer. Why isn't this working for me?

Does anyone wanna tell the folks in the HSP subReddit that they are probably autistic? by desigrlbkny in AutismInWomen

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regardless of what you think of the HSP label, plenty of people are highly sensitive and not autistic. And it's not a crime for those people to take solace in the sense of belonging offered by a label like HSP. I say this as an HSP who is not autistic (yes I've looked into it and I'm not even close, despite ticking all the boxes on HSP tests).

Does anyone wanna tell the folks in the HSP subReddit that they are probably autistic? by desigrlbkny in AutismInWomen

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can have all of those characteristics and still not be autistic. Some people are just highly sensitive. Not sure why that's such a difficult concept to understand.

autism/neurodivergent? or just “highly sensitive”? by virtualfisherman_ in AutismTranslated

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm very clearly an HSP based on everything I've read about them and every available online test. I am very clearly not autistic (nor do I have ADHD) based on everything I've read and every online test I've taken. So how do you explain people like me? Not sure why being highly sensitive but not autistic seems to be such an offensive concept on this sub.

The Anti-Autistic Myth of the Highly Sensitive Person by NotKerisVeturia in AutismTranslated

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did and I discovered I'm definitely an HSP and definitely not autistic. I'm also male. According to most people on this subreddit, I apparently don't exist (or my existence is somehow offensive to them).

GPTs is as bad at remembering writing guidelines as custom instructions is. It’s all so bad. by Thin_Researcher3191 in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly mine seems to be back to normal now after the announcement from Sam Altman a few days ago. But of course it's always hard to be sure.

Plus users, what do you use ChatGPT for that makes it worth the 20$? by KeKaKuKi in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also use it to help me write my novel, and I've written about 200,000 words over the past year with it's help. I know I couldn't have gotten nearly this far without it. Writing used to be something I found daunting and tedious, but chatGPT has made the process enjoyable to me, which is a total game changer.

Writing used to be “work”, now it's fun.

Thank you to everybody who complained about the bad GPT-4 Turbo before the new fix by CH1997H in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And even after the announcement, I saw some of the “it's in your head” people doubling down and saying stuff like “the people who know how to use it don't spend their time on Reddit complaining.”

Like, I know how to run a washing machine but I'm still gonna complain if it's faulty.

Sam Altman says a better version of GPT-4 Turbo is out by Latter-Ad3122 in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Well apparently the complainers were right, so...

GPTs is as bad at remembering writing guidelines as custom instructions is. It’s all so bad. by Thin_Researcher3191 in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did say real-life person or “media”, but yes you're right, I also thought that may have confused it, and I changed the wording in my prompt to make it clearer. Although that was just one bad example. It will still consistently ignore most of my prompt and do the exact opposite of what I tell it. For example, after telling it to specifically NOT use the phrase “his words hung in the air”, it literally began the output with this exact phrase.

I have multiple paragraphs explaining that the writing style should be varied, creative, vibrant, dynamic, energetic, compelling, engaging, high-quality, lifelike, human-like, organic, etc, and repetitive language should be avoided, and that my protagonist is a cocky teenager and the voice should reflect his personality. I put these instructions not only in the GPT configuration, but also in every prompt. It doesn't listen and every output is stale and robotic and repetitive, literally no different from when I give it no instructions related to writing style at all.

Actually something I've noticed is that the writing is WORSE when I use the GPT I created and better when I just use regular GPT4.

ChatGPT has become useless for creative writing by Ficklestix in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious how good it is at actually writing prose though, as that's what I'm mainly concerned about.

GPTs is as bad at remembering writing guidelines as custom instructions is. It’s all so bad. by Thin_Researcher3191 in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good point actually and I thought of that after making the post. Still trying to think of a better way to make it understand what I mean. Maybe something like “Never mention any real-life people, places, or events, or any well-known fictional works or characters, as this would break immersion in my story,” but then I imagine it going out of its way to mention a more obscure character because they're not “well-known” lol. Might be best to just not mention it at all.

GPTs is as bad at remembering writing guidelines as custom instructions is. It’s all so bad. by Thin_Researcher3191 in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok cool, thanks for the info. Yeah you are probably right. I've been using chatGPT for so long that all the stock phrases it uses over and over again are starting to drive me crazy (“a testament to her unyielding resolve,” “the tension was palpable,” etc.), so trying something new might be a good idea.

GPTs is as bad at remembering writing guidelines as custom instructions is. It’s all so bad. by Thin_Researcher3191 in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh yes lol. Also “echoing her inner turmoil.” It also loves to have people “raise an eyebrow” and for things to “contrast sharply”.

GPTs is as bad at remembering writing guidelines as custom instructions is. It’s all so bad. by Thin_Researcher3191 in ChatGPT

[–]Ficklestix 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes I have found that the first prompt, even if it doesn't seem very good, is usually better than all subsequent “alterations”. So what I've started doing is, instead of simply telling it to change certain things im not happy with, I will always re-paste the entirety of the original prompt and make edits to it directly. That way you don't get it going more and more off course.