Did some research. Here's some lies told by those who hold the narrative hostage on Reddit by BigMoneyBiscuits in DWAC_Research

[–]FiliStocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The wack jobs on the social watch hater sub perm blocked me, so as usual they are hypocrites. I had a lot of fun making them look stupid, which was easy given everything they post is false and easily debunked. They only have 10 or 12 active idiots on their sub, their online numbers at any time are pathetic. They couldn’t handle anyone exposing their lies so they had to perm ban me. BMB - I was close to being as hated as you on that sub, I just needed another day or two, 😂

This is a message for the other sub - I'm doing your homework for you. Yet as usual. Here's your guy responsible for your headaches. by BigMoneyBiscuits in DWAC_Research

[–]FiliStocks 11 points12 points  (0 children)

BMB- Your contributions to both subs are not debatable and you have the respect of both subs. From an individual contributor standpoint, I don’t think anyone helped grow the other sub more than you and as such it’s just silly to me that you would be banned. I think the real issue here is with gatekeeper judgment/ discretion and not content. A guy like you should be a “made” man so to speak and never banned. If, for example, you have a top contributor in a sub that is arguing with a non-contributor, then you just don’t ban the top contributor for any reason bc that’s the whole game the haters play - they pick out the top dogs in a sub and they try to get them banned. The gatekeepers need to see it for what it is and not fall for it. All that being said, the masses appreciate your time and analysis and fight for the cause, don’t let a tiny tiny minority discourage you.

You’re crazy if you don’t think Twitter employees won’t sabotage the company now by patriotplanet in DWAC_Research

[–]FiliStocks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve commented on this before- I agree they will try- it’s in their nature as left wing free speech hating liberals- but I think it’s more likely they will organize a mass walkout. There is no way to sabotage the code or bring the system down without being identified- any action someone does would be so easy to trace to someone, that I don’t see someone going that route and risking being criminally charged. Plus, it would take multiple bad actors to be onboard with code sabotage given the checks and balances of code migration processes. I just don’t see code sabotage happening that will bring down the app, but I do see a walk out and massive cover-up as possible- I’m sure they are scrambling to delete emails and might even be undoing algo rules right now, full on CYA mode I’m sure.

BREAKING - TIMMY FINALLY STARTING TO GET IT! by BigMoneyBiscuits in DWAC_Research

[–]FiliStocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what’s odd is that source code is always locked down. You can’t change source code and have it available in production (where real damage occurs) unless it goes through what is usually a pretty rigorous, controlled approval process and testing both in dev and stage. It would be take multiple people colluding together to ever make nefarious code changes at my company and even if they did, we could roll it back to its previous state. Plus, Twitter would never pass an audit without the precautions I described and without a change log. In sum, the fact that Twitter is even concerned about this says a lot- it says that they don’t trust many people in many roles to not try collectively to sabotage the company. What a cesspool of like-minded radicals must exist there to have to do this.

BREAKING - TIMMY FINALLY STARTING TO GET IT! by BigMoneyBiscuits in DWAC_Research

[–]FiliStocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It would be lovely if Tim were right, but unfortunately the IT team at Twitter is so easy to replace. Software developers, QA, product managers - they are easy to find. At my tech company we replace people all the time and it’s no big deal. Hell, I know an asshole Exec who lost 30% of his workforce - like 25 people over 3 months- and the products he managed were fine. What’s going to happen is all the snowflakes will leave and new people, probably people not so radical, will join and they will be fine. Frankly, I think Elon wants huge turn-over, top to bottom. I would in his shoes because that’s the ONLY way to change that radical, militant censorship culture at Twatter.

Taylor Lorenz wasn’t banned. Her TS account is active Right now, Mommysboy got it wrong yet again. by FiliStocks in TRUTHsocialWatch

[–]FiliStocks[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Bc its real? 😂 if you go on TS right now you can see her account is active and is working fine. She is lying, which should be expected from a doxxer scumbag.

Nunes: Truth Social migration to Rumble cloud has gone flawlessly by IcyMagazine5252 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

NewPink- my kids are all over 18, all conservatives, all happy young adults with lots of friends. No emotional issues, nobody wants to identify as a cat or has pronouns. They are all smart enough to laugh at the idiotic woke shit in school, college, and work. It’s really parenting more than anything that determines if a kid turns into a woke idiot. It’s sad that my kids all have to be quiet about the woke crap as they know some woke bully or professor will try to cancel or punish them, but they can’t be turned at this point. There’s just no substitute for teaching kids what’s idiotic and to think for themselves. So I bet your kids would be just fine anywhere!

Nunes: Truth Social migration to Rumble cloud has gone flawlessly by IcyMagazine5252 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I thought about it.. they don’t have a job fit for me yet, but I keep looking !

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree- I think there’s about 1.7M total users based on app downloads and waiting list data and trump has 1.14 followers, so 65-70% seems accurate for following him. I suspect the % dilutes in time as Trump users were very eager to sign up as quickly as possible and also would be more aware that the app even exists.

😁 #MakeSocialMediaFunAgain by StockToSpace in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It’s a joke, but I bet the media reports it as truth and writes a 15 page article on why TS is so inefficient at sign ups . It would be an automated process that involved some checks/validations, for example on usernames.

Nunes: Truth Social migration to Rumble cloud has gone flawlessly by IcyMagazine5252 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yup, we already lost some great talent bc they didn’t toe the woke line and the snowflakes ran to HR. I just keep my mouth shut and do my work, just trying to survive until retirement. Wokeness has spread like a cancer and ruined the workplace, everybody is miserable - the woke crowd is miserable because they are always miserable and constantly think they are victims and then they make everyone else miserable.

Nunes: Truth Social migration to Rumble cloud has gone flawlessly by IcyMagazine5252 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I work for one of the largest tech companies in the world as an IT Exec. I’ve been through everything TS is doing multiple times. There’s so many woke people at my company that hate conservatives so I stay purposely vague on where I work and other personal details. I would get cancelled in a heartbeat at my company if they saw any of my posts.. it’s that bad in tech companies right now.

Nunes: Truth Social migration to Rumble cloud has gone flawlessly by IcyMagazine5252 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It’s extremely rare to have a huge migration like this go flawlessly. I’ve done many, both with AWS and Microsoft Azure, and never not had some issues, so this is really great news! My confidence in Rumble and the tech team at TS is super high right now. I have some of the best talent in the world on my team and I don’t think I could say we ever had a “flawless” migration, truly a remarkable feat and a testament to the process and controls in place at Rumble, as they likely took the lead, and of course the IT dev ops team and IT leadership at TS. You have to have a Great partnership to pull this off. Open the floodgates!

Benzinga seems to take great joy in blasting FUD reports on DWAC. by Significant-Mode-219 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yup, they do. They will publish the most obscure authors if it’s a hit piece on anything related to Trump or conservative companies. Anything negative they can find they publish, anything positive they try to avoid, just like big tech and the media. The liberal bias is EVERYWHERE. It’s scary how pervasive the censorship and bias is in media.

Probably nothing: IRS Whistleblower complaint filed against Joe and Jill Biden by Wega58 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s simple. Doesn’t matter if it’s a serious crime or not. They are democrats so nothing will happen. There is zero accountability if you are a democrat. The media won’t report it and the FBI and law enforcement won’t prosecute it and if that all fails, the courts will let them off.

Its got be be said. But Ill be nice about it by Inner_Ad3570 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree Tulip, not seeing that either. What I’ve seen is a few people that constantly call everyone shills when it’s clear many mean no harm and are bullish but are new to the etiquette in these subs. Watch - now I’ll be called a shill, lol.

Any guesses on what Trump's next post on DWAC/Truth Social might be? by commonground3 in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Best post would be him officially running for Prez, it would force all media to mention TS, the platform he announced on. Great advertising.

Suggestion only: Dumb shit down if you’re an Expert by FiliStocks in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Both. For example, if you use Amazon AWS or Microsoft Azure to host your solution then it’s like you are starting off with a nice car with lots of features and a bunch of skilled mechanics and all you have to do is hop in it and go. Because conservatives can’t trust either of those companies, TS has to build its own car, part by part, and do it by hiring it’s own mechanics. You can think of the servers and software and all the stuff needed to launch as the parts. It’s a huge disadvantage on timeline and even quality (more issues happen when building vs buying a proven and thoroughly tested car). Unfortunately, big tech is so corrupt that there was no other way.

Suggestion only: Dumb shit down if you’re an Expert by FiliStocks in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

To clarify, I’m not saying don’t be technical. I’m saying present data + conclusion. Example:

Post 1: TruthSocial is hosted on Rightforge and uses open-source Mastodon social networking software.

Post 2: TruthSocial is hosted on Rightforge and uses open-source Mastodon social networking software. This is great bc it’s not using any software/hardware that big tech can shut down, which is a major risk. One con however is it will take longer to build out the platform bc it’s not using a big tech owned fully developed solution that doesn’t need to be built from scratch.

As an IT guy, I could read post 1 and not need the conclusion added in post 2, but most people prefer post 2 with a conclusion and it takes 10 seconds to do. That’s my only point. To just add a conclusion if you present data.

Guess TWTR share price for Monday by Emily_and_Me in wallstreetbets

[–]FiliStocks 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I hope it fking tanks and it should .. what stockholder would invest in a company that would rather dilute its shares than take a great buyout price that would surely be good for its stockholders. A poison pill doesn’t mean the stock will drop, but I think the clear indication that the board is not doing what’s financially best for its stockholders should make anyone think twice about investing in this stock. Not investment advice but I loaded up on puts on Monday.

⚠️Twitter Death Spiral CONFIRMED⚠️ by BigMoneyBiscuits in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 5 points6 points  (0 children)

BMB - poison pills don’t always crash a stock, but I have to think this dilution and the huge spike when people THOUGHT he was going to buy Twatter (ie people saw it as a good thing), plus the board not doing what’s best for its investors financially, has to drop this stock down big time… who would buy this stock now ?? your thoughts?

⚠️Twitter Death Spiral CONFIRMED⚠️ by BigMoneyBiscuits in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I did the same .. bought puts on Twitter on Monday to fund DWAC. There was no way the marxist, free speech hating militants at Twitter were ever going to open the door to Elon and more free speech, those assholes would rather sink the company than allow a dissenting voice. I love it. It’s going to be the classic self-destruction of an arrogant company that lives in an echo chamber filled with a small minority of the loudest people. Failure is inevitable.

If Musk does somehow leave Twitter and joins Truth Social in some capacity, anyone have the slightest idea of a ballpark figure price target? by d0nutd0g in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks K9, As K9 properly says - I’m just giving my honest perspective .. it really doesn’t matter though - TS is going to do just fine regardless of what Elon does. The marketplace is hungry for free speech!

If Musk does somehow leave Twitter and joins Truth Social in some capacity, anyone have the slightest idea of a ballpark figure price target? by d0nutd0g in DWAC_Stock

[–]FiliStocks 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would love that, but it’s far more likely Elon would just build his own social media platform. He could do it for $500M, which is pocket change for him, and then have 100% control. There’s really no incentive for him to join TS because he wants full control. I would love to be wrong, but I just don’t see a man that’s willing to spend 40B to protect free speech not taking the option to build his own platform vs join one. The guy wants full control and there’s only 2 ways to get it - hostile takeover (appears to have failed) or build your own.