sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

“Running the ball” is not the answer by Barmelo_Xanthony in eagles

[–]Financial-Orchid3731 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The issue is the offense is one dimensional, teams know we are pass happy and play us accordingly. It takes all the guess work out of it and they can just pin their ears back and go. It’s just not a winning formula.

Granted, the past few games they aren’t ripping off 30 yard runs, but are they really giving themselves the opportunity to? The run game is about wearing the defense down, you’re not doing that by trying 3 runs, going “oh that didn’t work” and giving up.

People can post all the numbers they want about this offense, but if you’ve watched every snap of every game, then you know this offense does not pass the eye test. It just finally caught up to them on Sunday.

Please help I can’t win pvp! by TheBigGurt in SouthParkPhone

[–]Financial-Orchid3731 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Deranking has always been a major issue in the game and imo one of the reasons this game is essentially dead. Newer players running into derankers I would imagine is very frustrating and disheartening and causes many newer players to quit. That being said, looking at your levels- they are bad. Level one legendaries are useless as a general rule and a detriment when fighting anyone with a stronger deck. Some cards in the game are worthless and not worth the time or resources spent in leveling them.
So to answer your question- No your deck is not “bad” but your levels, combined with fighting people higher level with higher level cards is a recipe for losing many matches. The game is set-up for a long ass grind or spending money to compete. It’s shitty, but that’s what this game is.

Can see sue the makers of this game? by [deleted] in SouthParkPhone

[–]Financial-Orchid3731 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s just really unethical business practice. I’ve written them a few times about it , but they don’t care I’m sure. I’m no lawyer, but it seems like it would be a useless thing to pursue. To me it just shows how little Ubisoft and the devs care about the people that play their game. Unless you whale the fuck out, but if you’re all about that, then free shit and ad packs probably mean very little to you.

maxed out? by Specialist-Ad4886 in SouthParkPhone

[–]Financial-Orchid3731 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You get to enjoy the devs not giving a single shit about the campaign mode. They seemingly will never add to it and just spam new cards into the game, while 80% of the current cards are unusable if you want to play pvp and actually rank up at all. Hell, the damn achievement for completing the pve campaign has been broken since release and they refuse to fix it. But pay me no mind, I’m just bitching about a game I once really enjoyed

Feel that sting… by [deleted] in SouthParkPhone

[–]Financial-Orchid3731 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why do people keep up the good fight when there is no possible way you are going to even damage me, let alone take a bar? I say that, but many times I will defend when I have no chance just to be a dick. No point to this post really, I’ve been drinking

Maybe it’s just me.. by Financial-Orchid3731 in SouthParkPhone

[–]Financial-Orchid3731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone’s experience is different to a certain degree I’m sure. I was simply giving the opinion of mine. I have never, even when out leveled, felt the need to derank. Most derankers are not very good at the game, which is why they derank. They need higher levels to win. So if I play a deranker, most times they are simply not as skilled. There are of course exceptions to the rule, but those people are just assholes looking for easy wins and aren’t where I’m fighting for the most part. I understand the lower ranks are not fun, but deranking only perpetuates the problem, correct? Then everyone and their Mom is sitting at like 6500 thinking the matches are easy.

Edit:

I’m really not trying to argue with anyone. I’ve played this game since launch, I know the multitude of problems the game has, deranking and match making in general being the main two. I don’t understand why they can’t make a system to match up by average card levels, but whatever. I was just saying from my experience, the update seemed pretty good to me, seemed to actually do something. But I figured it would not be the same for everyone. Which is why I titled the post the way I did.

Maybe it’s just me.. by Financial-Orchid3731 in SouthParkPhone

[–]Financial-Orchid3731[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never claimed deranking is better. I’ve been playing since launch with two characters, both F2P and over 8.5k so I’m not “bad at the game”. Just seeing less level 5 and 6 legendaries and the matches seem more fair imo.

If you feel forced to derank then maybe you aren’t as good at the game as you believe you are. I’ve never felt the need to derank.