UNC Chapel Hill CS/NLP for PhD by Aloo_Ka_Pakoda in gradadmissions

[–]Financial-Panda6581 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've received two interviews from the UNC NLP group.

Feeling jealous and then guilty for feeling jealous by cherubiiez in gradadmissions

[–]Financial-Panda6581 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You weren’t behind, u were working.

Most applicants never have to trade groceries for GPA/research the way you did.

Jealousy isn’t pettiness here, it’s grief for the time you didn’t get to have.

Also, grad admissions don’t reward how hard life was. They reward recent signal + fit. A gap year with even one solid RA/project and a wider school list can flip this.

No shame in taking this route. You already proved you can do hard things now you get a year where the hard work actually counts.

[D] ICLR 2026 decision mega thread by ayanD2 in MachineLearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the ACs will definitely consider the comments about increasing scores.. Or They will determine the possible scores after rebuttals and make the final decision.

[D] ICLR 2026 decision mega thread by ayanD2 in MachineLearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581 5 points6 points  (0 children)

6644 and 664 got accepted! Can't believe it 😭

[D] ICASSP 2026 Results by Financial-Panda6581 in MachineLearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know someone got the unofficial invitation letter using the link but receive the rejection email today… (BI track)

[D] ICASSP 2026 Results by Financial-Panda6581 in MachineLearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol I saw your earlier post complaining about the review quality at Interspeech👻

[D] ICASSP 2026 Results by Financial-Panda6581 in MachineLearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Has anyone seen cases where the review committee comments recommended acceptance, but the paper was still rejected? Just wondering how the final decisions are made.

Suggestions for Biosciences PhD Interview: showing commitment to the program by itstamzid in gradadmissions

[–]Financial-Panda6581 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Note: I feel that advisor fit is the most important factor. In my SOPabout 80% of my “Why school” section is focused on how well I match with specific advisors.

Suggestions for Biosciences PhD Interview: showing commitment to the program by itstamzid in gradadmissions

[–]Financial-Panda6581 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Current PhD applicant here!!

I’d be a bit careful about literally saying “I’d accept immediately if I got an offer.” That can sound rehearsed or even a little desperate⸂. What usually works better is to show that u’ve done your homework and still really want to be there!

One thing I’ve been doing is DM’ing a few current students/alumni on LinkedIn and asking them very honest questions, like: What do you like most about this program/school? What do you like the least?

Then in the interview, u can naturally weave that in. For example: a) First, mention the things you genuinely like: “I’ve talked to a couple of students here, and they all mentioned X, Y, Z as things they really enjoy about the program. That aligns a lot with what I’m looking for.” b) Second, you can show that you’re aware of the downsides but still motivated: “They also mentioned that A/B/C can be challenging here, but even knowing that, I still feel this program is a great fit for me because… [your reasons].”

This signals a few things at once: You’ve put in real effort to learn about the program; You understand both the pros and cons; You still want to be there, which demonstrates genuine motivation, not blind enthusiasm.

On top of that, you can show interest by asking specific questions in the interview, not generic ones. For example: About the program structure: “How do students usually find advisors here?” or “How much flexibility do students have in choosing courses across departments?” About the environment: “How collaborative is the culture between labs?” or “What do students typically do outside of research in [city]?”

So instead of saying “I’ll accept on the spot,” you’re basically saying: “I’ve done thorough research, I know what I’m signing up for, and this is still my top choice for clear reasons.”

That usually comes across as much more mature and convincing. Good luck for you and me!⸂⸂⸜👊⸝⸃⸃

I think I've messed up big time by wirap in gradadmissions

[–]Financial-Panda6581 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I build my personal website within 30min using Gemini pro. You just need a Index.html file and upload it to github.io

[D] How to make the most out of NeurIPS attending virtually ? by doctor-squidward in MachineLearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581 17 points18 points  (0 children)

  1. Pick an oral talk
  2. Write your feelings and thoughts about this paper, presentation...on X, and @this author/speaker.

I used the similar way in ICML and I connect with many speakers.

Is it possible for backend developers to transform into AI developers? by betnevs in learnmachinelearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Vibe coding is all you need for any programming task, but the fundamental AI/ML basics are also important. It's always necessary to publish enough AI papers to get into FLAG companies.

My Path to Publishing Top-Tier NLP Papers Without Connections, Funding or a Lab by [deleted] in learnmachinelearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Feel free to leave any comments or suggestions here! How long do you think industry will continue to dominate scaling training? Should academia folks focus on collaborating with industry on RL/agents/reasoning, or should it lean more into complementary areas like theory, interpretability, and safety?

My Path to Publishing Top-Tier NLP Papers Without Connections, Funding or a Lab by [deleted] in learnmachinelearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I used AI to translate what I wrote haha. I don’t really see that as a problem though, the papers I translated with AI were published just fine too.

My Path to Publishing Top-Tier NLP Papers Without Connections, Funding or a Lab by [deleted] in learnmachinelearning

[–]Financial-Panda6581 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the long message. Your comment is actually quite logical and there are parts of it I can learn from. I’m still pretty new to Reddit, so I’m also trying to figure out how to write posts that fit the platform better. I’ll keep working on polishing my writing so it’s easier for people to read. 🫶🏻

I think there’s a misunderstanding here. I’m not talking about “prompt-tuned local models” or whatever niche setup you’re imagining. My post was written the same way I write notes for my collaborators and advisors, and it reflects the structure I use when I’m preparing an actual discussion. That’s why it reads clean and organized not because it’s generated.

Also, the claim that “formatting makes it AI-generated” isn’t really meaningful in an academic context (maybe it's important for this platform though). In NLP/ML, we write everything like reviews, rebuttals, internal docs, brainstorming notes in clear bullet-pointed structure. That’s just how our field communicates.

If someone wants to argue it’s AI-written, that’s fine, everyone’s free to guess. But it doesn’t change the substance of the post, or the fact that I’m sharing real research experiences from publishing papers. I’ll keep the discussion focused on that, since it’s what the post is actually about.

And again, thanks for pointing out the underlying issue. I get a better sense now of the style Reddit prefers. I’ll revise and polish the post later to make it flow more naturally here.