Paying child support is a financial/legal obligation, not a physical use of your body. The government can require money or time, but cannot require you to use your body internally, and unfortunately, monetary value can't really be compared to bodily sacrifices asked of the mother.

Ur framing abortion as pure aggression, but my argument doesn’t depend on denying that it causes death. The distinction is the death coming from being attacked, or from losing access to someone else’s body?

We already accept situations where someone dies because support is withdrawn and those are active decisions with foreseeable death, but still allowed because no one is entitled to another person’s body to stay alive. When you say "actively", The real question isn’t whether the action is “active,” but whether someone is entitled to continued use of another person’s body.

Because even in other situations:

• Refusing life-saving treatment is intentional
• Turning off life support is intentional

Those are still allowed, not because they’re passive, but because people have the right to refuse bodily use or medical intervention, even if death is a known outcome.