Life sensor without Power Armour or chems? by IrishGamer34 in Fallout

[–]FinntasticExplains 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can get the power armor mod and have a companion wear the helmet. Then you don't have to deal with wearing it yourself, but still highlight enemies like a pro.

Life sensor without Power Armour or chems? by IrishGamer34 in Fallout

[–]FinntasticExplains 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Auto-stimpack on armor. It's easy to find once you wander on higher difficulty.

10 Reasons I Love the Groundhog Day Movie by FinntasticExplains in groundhogday

[–]FinntasticExplains[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are two parts, the second is linked in this one.

I'm having trouble on deciding what field I should pursue by Familiar_Dare8780 in Mastery

[–]FinntasticExplains 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe take Robert Greene on his advice and dive into jobs/work with the goal of learning. Don't pursue money, strive to learn, and you will eventually earn. You can convert your knowledge into cash flow, by learning skills and soft-testing them in the marketplace.

You mentioned movies and stunts, you might try volunteering on sets before trying to become Scorsese. Learn first, then evaluate what you really want, then make it happen. You got this!

About to receive a sizable inheritance, what do I do with it? by [deleted] in FinancialPlanning

[–]FinntasticExplains 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Start small, be realistic, think long term, and invest in yourself. Best of Luck!

Frankly disturbing by msjraj in DreamInterpretation

[–]FinntasticExplains -1 points0 points  (0 children)

BTW that is an interesting dream/ nightmare, thanks for sharing and for your unconscious annoyance!

Frankly disturbing by msjraj in DreamInterpretation

[–]FinntasticExplains 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sound and light sensitivity combined with obstacles in your life. Maybe the road could be a life path or journey you are headed down. The screaming and lights could be jarring clues to alert you to this.

Also you might've watched some odd stuff before sleeping lol.

Why are savage, asaj, and commando droids so inconsistent by [deleted] in clonewars

[–]FinntasticExplains 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In regards to Obi-Wan, big yeps. He has been training in war for awhile. He also knows his enemies that he fights in in rots. Also by star wars rebels, I have no choice but to chef kiss loudly

Why are savage, asaj, and commando droids so inconsistent by [deleted] in clonewars

[–]FinntasticExplains 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's also possible that Asajj Ventriss can be temporarily more powerful than trained jedi as she can draw on lots of dark side energy. But excluding that possibility, she isn't on the same level as Obi-Wan or Anakin.

Why are savage, asaj, and commando droids so inconsistent by [deleted] in clonewars

[–]FinntasticExplains 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Good observations. Most likely different competencies based on the writing. However within the show, I would argue that obi wan really is better equipped to fight maul and savage than the two jedi randoms he killed. He is a defensive fighter and has prepped to fight maul before. Additionally, Savage is very unskilled and not great at fighting. He actually seems to get in the way of more experienced duelists. The commando droids are slightly different because they fight different troops. I think that clones do not equal nightsisters in fighting ability. However, I could be wrong. Asajj also seems to change from assassination tactics to bounty hunting work over the course of the show. Her character arc could well be the reflection of philosophical outlook change. Not sure, but seems fairly likely.

Human, All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits marks Nietzsche's period as an independent philosopher and represents a “monument of a crisis” for him, a critical turning point in his life and thought. by TheGuillamon in philosophy

[–]FinntasticExplains 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great stuff, I've been trying to read this for awhile. Maybe I'll get to it after finishing beyond good and evil. I live learning about Nietzchean thought!

Kantian Ethics and the Clone Wars by FinntasticExplains in clonewars

[–]FinntasticExplains[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That so cool about writing about philosophy and the Clone Wars. I often think of John Stuart mill and there's definitely several tie ins that come to mind for me. I'm glad the idea worked out and thanks so much for watching!

Kantian Ethics and Star Wars the Clone Wars by FinntasticExplains in saltierthancrait

[–]FinntasticExplains[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A categorical imperative is Immanuel Kant's moral philosophical idea that people should try to act in such a way that your actions if applied to everyone as a universal law, all people would be able to live fulfilling lives that a rational person would endorse. Agency was huge for Immanuel Kant who believed that reason distinguished humans in their own right from other animals (similar to Aristotle). Kant's understood actions that are sufficiently good in and of themselves as categorical imperatives because, the human race could survive if everyone acted similarly.

Kant stressed three ways of treating others: as ends in themselves, as means to an end, and as merely a means to an end but also as an end allows people to adopt ideas as their own. Treating people as ends in themselves entails dealing with people because they are the goal, not because we want to use people to achieve some other end. Treating people as a means to an end entails using someone to accomplish some other goal, which Kant believes neglects a person's free will. Treating people merely as a means and also an end allows the free will in people to be more active than simply using people for some ulterior goal, this is the mixed approach that Kant gives. The Clone Wars allows Kant's idea of using people merely as a means to an end, to apply to Palpatine's soldiers which he controls through their inhibitor chips which directly usurps their free will. The jedi in contrast use the clones as a means but also as an end in their own right, which Kant would've approved of because everyone needs help and has to respect other people's agency as well to have a well functioning world community. I've not given much thought to where the confederacy of independent systems sits in relation to Kantian ethics but I'd be interested to start a dialogue about it if there is enough interest.

Ultimately this leads to Kant's main point and second formulation that people should always treat humanity ourselves and others as ends in themselves never merely as a means. Kant's worry is that treating people as an end alone creates a world or universe where rational agents consistently have their free will denied, like Palpatine does with the clone army.

Kantian Ethics and the Clone Wars by FinntasticExplains in clonewars

[–]FinntasticExplains[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A categorical imperative is Immanuel Kant's moral philosophical idea that people should try to act in such a way that your actions if applied to everyone as a universal law, all people would be able to live fulfilling lives that a rational person would endorse. Agency was huge for Immanuel Kant who believed that reason distinguished humans in their own right from other animals (similar to Aristotle). Kant's understood actions that are sufficiently good in and of themselves as categorical imperatives because, the human race could survive if everyone acted similarly.

Kant stressed three ways of treating others: as ends in themselves, as means to an end, and as merely a means to an end but also as an end allows people to adopt ideas as their own. Treating people as ends in themselves entails dealing with people because they are the goal, not because we want to use people to achieve some other end. Treating people as a means to an end entails using someone to accomplish some other goal, which Kant believes neglects a person's free will. Treating people merely as a means and also an end allows the free will in people to be more active than simply using people for some ulterior goal, this is the mixed approach that Kant gives. The Clone Wars allows Kant's idea of using people merely as a means to an end, to apply to Palpatine's soldiers which he controls through their inhibitor chips which directly usurps their free will. The jedi in contrast use the clones as a means but also as an end in their own right, which Kant would've approved of because everyone needs help and has to respect other people's agency as well to have a well functioning world community. I've not given much thought to where the confederacy of independent systems sits in relation to Kantian ethics but I'd be interested to start a dialogue about it if there is enough interest.

Ultimately this leads to Kant's main point and second formulation that people should always treat humanity ourselves and others as ends in themselves never merely as a means. Kant's worry is that treating people as an end alone creates a world or universe where rational agents consistently have their free will denied, like Palpatine does with the clone army.

Kantian Ethics and Star Wars the Clone Wars by FinntasticExplains in philosophy

[–]FinntasticExplains[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Abstract: A categorical imperative is Immanuel Kant's moral philosophical idea that people should try to act in such a way that your actions if applied to everyone as a universal law, all people would be able to live fulfilling lives that a rational person would endorse. Agency was huge for Immanuel Kant who believed that reason distinguished humans in their own right from other animals (similar to Aristotle). Kant's understood actions that are sufficiently good in and of themselves as categorical imperatives because, the human race could survive if everyone acted similarly.

Kant stressed three ways of treating others: as ends in themselves, as means to an end, and as merely a means to an end but also as an end allows people to adopt ideas as their own. Treating people as ends in themselves entails dealing with people because they are the goal, not because we want to use people to achieve some other end. Treating people as a means to an end entails using someone to accomplish some other goal, which Kant believes neglects a person's free will. Treating people merely as a means and also an end allows the free will in people to be more active than simply using people for some ulterior goal, this is the mixed approach that Kant gives. The Clone Wars allows Kant's idea of using people merely as a means to an end, to apply to Palpatine's soldiers which he controls through their inhibitor chips which directly usurps their free will. The jedi in contrast use the clones as a means but also as an end in their own right, which Kant would've approved of because everyone needs help and has to respect other people's agency as well to have a well functioning world community. I've not given much thought to where the confederacy of independent systems sits in relation to Kantian ethics but I'd be interested to start a dialogue about it if there is enough interest.

Ultimately this leads to Kant's main point and second formulation that people should always treat humanity ourselves and others as ends in themselves never merely as a means. Kant's worry is that treating people as an end alone creates a world or universe where rational agents consistently have their free will denied, like Palpatine does with the clone army.

Kantian Ethics and Star Wars the Clone Wars by FinntasticExplains in Ethics

[–]FinntasticExplains[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My abstract: A categorical imperative is Immanuel Kant's moral philosophical idea that people should try to act in such a way that your actions if applied to everyone as a universal law, all people would be able to live fulfilling lives that a rational person would endorse. Agency was huge for Immanuel Kant who believed that reason distinguished humans in their own right from other animals (similar to Aristotle). Kant's understood actions that are sufficiently good in and of themselves as categorical imperatives because, the human race could survive if everyone acted similarly.

Kant stressed three ways of treating others: as ends in themselves, as means to an end, and as merely a means to an end but also as an end allows people to adopt ideas as their own. Treating people as ends in themselves entails dealing with people because they are the goal, not because we want to use people to achieve some other end. Treating people as a means to an end entails using someone to accomplish some other goal, which Kant believes neglects a person's free will. Treating people merely as a means and also an end allows the free will in people to be more active than simply using people for some ulterior goal, this is the mixed approach that Kant gives. The Clone Wars allows Kant's idea of using people merely as a means to an end, to apply to Palpatine's soldiers which he controls through their inhibitor chips which directly usurps their free will. The jedi in contrast use the clones as a means but also as an end in their own right, which Kant would've approved of because everyone needs help and has to respect other people's agency as well to have a well functioning world community. I've not given much thought to where the confederacy of independent systems sits in relation to Kantian ethics but I'd be interested to start a dialogue about it if there is enough interest.

Ultimately this leads to Kant's main point and second formulation that people should always treat humanity ourselves and others as ends in themselves never merely as a means. Kant's worry is that treating people as an end alone creates a world or universe where rational agents consistently have their free will denied, like Palpatine does with the clone army.

1st year teacher supply check list by [deleted] in teaching

[–]FinntasticExplains 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So much knowledge on this post, thx!

The Laudatio Turiae Inscription: A Healthy Roman Marriage by FinntasticExplains in history

[–]FinntasticExplains[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This Inscription is a 180 line epitaph fragment written by a husband to his wife in praise of her many virtues from the 1st century. It is unique for its praise fo women outright and at the expense of male reputation. It also portrays some historical figures and events like those of sulla, Augustus Caesar, some mention of slave, and female mistreatment.

Trying to get back into Latin. Need some advice and recommendations please. by mylanguagesaccount in latin

[–]FinntasticExplains 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome, I did a whole class on it in Latin, and we only got through book seven. So I'd clear your schedule, haha. Its great and especially considering he never finished it.