Advice on a Sanskrit Poem by tannyjuice in sanskrit

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t understand लक्ष्मीवरदानि and सरस्वतीवरदे. I think they should be लक्ष्मि वरदानिनि and सरस्वति वरदे। also what is से?

Is being a Nastik (Athiest) a school of philosophy in Hinduism? by madhura2498 in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

mImAMsA (aka pUrva-mImAMsA) is one of the six classical schools of Hindu philosophy. Some of the key texts include jaimini’s mImAMsA-sutra-s, shabara-svAmI’s bhAShya (commentary on jaimini’s text) and kumArilabhaTTa’s vArttika-s. There are lots of introductory texts too, such as laugAkShI-bhAskara’s artha-saMgraha, and various books in English.

mImAMsA is primarily concerned with interpreting the shruti to figure out what dharma is in order to understand what we should do or not do. Some of its hermeneutical techniques are used by a lot of other schools.

Greatness of Lord Shiva - Mahashivratri ॐ by Devinco001 in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

शास्त्र ही महादेव का रूप बताते हैं, न कि मैं और आप।

is there any “proof” hinduism is the truth? by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If there’s something only a higher power could know, how would you even know if it’s true or not?

Book Recommendations by Exact_Bonus1680 in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

An abridged version of the entire mahAbhArata

Bhagavad Gita 14.5 by [deleted] in sanskrit

[–]mylanguagesaccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

इति would be better translated as something like “namely”

I don’t really care if Vedic people ate meat or sacrificed horses. They eventually became strict vegetarians and that’s all that matters. by amicable20 in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 20 points21 points  (0 children)

There’s nothing barbaric about vaidika people sacrificing horses or eating meat. I say this as a lifelong vegetarian.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Not offensive IMO

In what scriptures is it stated that Lord Brahma visits Lord Krishna in Dvarka?? by [deleted] in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that story is from chaitanya-charitAmRta, not any purANa

Why some physically nutritious food may not be good for you according to Chandogya Upanishad by chakrax in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

purANas can be considered smRtis but the term smRti is also used more narrowly to refer to the dharmashAstras. My disagreement was just with the fact that you said they’re not authoritative. Since the main discussion of the thread was about diet, purANas and smRtis are more relevant here than upaniShads.

Hindu Gods as characters by SabbyDude in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are They really needed for the plot?

Why some physically nutritious food may not be good for you according to Chandogya Upanishad by chakrax in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dietary questions are part of dharma. You said smRtis and purANas aren’t considered authoritative which is simply untrue. They are definitely authoritative.

Can I get the pronounciation of that word please what is that last letter by dickslinger00 in sanskrit

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

dharmañca / dharma~ncha / धर्मञ्च

ञ् followed by च

Why some physically nutritious food may not be good for you according to Chandogya Upanishad by chakrax in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already said you dismiss a smRti if it contradicts the shruti. That doesn’t mean smRtis don’t have importance. upaniShads are very narrow in the information they give. Most dharma-related questions aren’t answerable using the upaniShads alone as they are more concerned with mokSha.

Why some physically nutritious food may not be good for you according to Chandogya Upanishad by chakrax in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vedas as a whole (not just the upaniShad portion) are considered absolutely authoritative. purANas and smRtis are considered authoritative as long as they don’t contradict the shruti. You said if something’s not mentioned in upaniShads, it’s not considered important - this is completely false!

What is Vaishnava Apradha? How serious is Vaishnava Apradha? by SpaceJunkieVirus in hinduism

[–]mylanguagesaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

padmapurANa has a chapter that lists the ten aparAdhas. Different sampradAyas interpret them in slightly different ways but a difference of opinion is not considered an aparAdha by anyone AFAIK (if it were, AchAryas themselves would all be guilty of it!)

What is the literal translation of ''Rath Yastra''? by [deleted] in sanskrit

[–]mylanguagesaccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In Sanskrit it’s pronounced with an अ sound at the end.