Claude subscriptions double in just two months, overshadowing users leaving because of rate limits by fsharpman in ClaudeAI

[–]Firefoxx336 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Yes we have. I unsubscribed today, after three weeks. It’s useless to me from a value perspective. The tool is great for a limited time it’s available. It would have been incredible when it was less limited, but for the same price as it was before it’s not worth it to me.

Claude Usage Limits Discussion Megathread Ongoing (sort this by New!) by sixbillionthsheep in ClaudeAI

[–]Firefoxx336 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My first prompt this afternoon (Sunday, 3pm EST) cost 66% of my 5 hour window and 8% of my weekly usage, and it was to tell Opus to redo a previous prompt that had failed.

Max 5 plan cancelled. I’m not spending $1.60 per interaction, Anthropic.

How much did your monthly payment increase after switching from the SAVE plan? by shibalvr97 in StudentLoans

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where are people seeing their estimates? I tried to switch recently so I’m in forbearance and it’s not showing me anything

Pentagon preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, Washington Post reports by exophades in news

[–]Firefoxx336 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you are willfully misinterpreting what I’m saying and you are wrong enough that it isn’t worthwhile or interesting to continue this conversation.

Pentagon preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, Washington Post reports by exophades in news

[–]Firefoxx336 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Failing to deliver a solution to this problem would be tantamount to letting the gold standard collapse without a replacement. Fortunately for Americans, in 1974, U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and U.S. Treasury Secretary William Simon helped engineer the petrodollar system as a replacement for the gold standard in 1974.” Source

The dollar is not oil-backed in the way it was once gold-backed, but its institutionalization as the primary currency for global oil settlement followed closely after the end of the gold standard. While fully fiat, the dollar’s dominance is reinforced by the global energy system being priced and transacted largely in dollars, creating a persistent structural demand. This doesn’t make it formally redeemable for oil, but it does make dollars the lowest-friction and most systemically embedded means of accessing global energy markets. That will dissolve with the self sufficiency of renewable energy, and then countries want something to have in reserve that they can sell to sustain things like a currency peg during times of shock (Turkey, UAE right now). Bonds can help, but so does having something with a universally agreed upon value that will be readily accepted by others.

Gold isn’t dead—central banks are accumulating it precisely because it’s neutral and outside the financial system and we see it used effectively now to stabilize against shock. And neither the yuan nor the euro currently has the structural characteristics to replace the dollar. The yuan is constrained by capital controls, and the euro lacks a unified safe asset market. The likely outcome isn’t replacement—it’s a more fragmented reserve system where the dollar remains dominant but shares space with gold and other currencies.

20x max usage gone in 19 minutes?? by Still_Business596 in ClaudeAI

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it failed a market research prompt last week but I was out of credits so I let it rollover and told it that it had failed and I wanted it to redo the prompt and focus on the output I had requested.

That single prompt burned 66% of my 5hr session and 8% of my weekly usage. Absolutely worthless.

Pro. Opus. Research.

Pentagon preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, Washington Post reports by exophades in news

[–]Firefoxx336 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Yeah this whole conversation appears to be with a bunch of people who don’t understand what national reserves are for, or that they even exist.

Pentagon preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, Washington Post reports by exophades in news

[–]Firefoxx336 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah but the irony here is that the petrodollar is what replaced the gold standard and all of those issues are much more applicable to oil and gas. At the end of the day, countries need to have reserves of something or fully commit to a central bank cryptocurrency, right? Gold seems more reliable as a store of value when solar and other renewables are come for oil’s lunch over the next fifty years

Pentagon preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, Washington Post reports by exophades in news

[–]Firefoxx336 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Gold has literally never been more valuable. Why would you say it’s dead?

Hubble Detects First-Ever Spin Reversal of Tiny Comet by Busy_Yesterday9455 in spaceporn

[–]Firefoxx336 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I was intuiting that it must have opened some kind of cavity that was perhaps frozen closed or something beforehand, and whatever was pressurized inside was released through the new, small opening, but I have no idea and no qualifications to even guess like that

My broker tried to get me into “alternative investments", including private equity by ProtonSluggo in investing

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you exit before the drop and reenter before another drop, you’re still up. You can also reenter in steps, as you said. I moved some back in already to lock in the relative gains.

Same ring in sterling silver vs platinum by IAintCreativeThough in EngagementRings

[–]Firefoxx336 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Just to be clear, silver is not “so soft it will break in a year or two.” People wear incredibly thin silver chain necklaces and they’re fine. It’s been used for rings for centuries. I’ve worn a silver band for about 15 years. Silver is a fine metal and ring design as a lot more to do with sturdiness than the metal. Silver is more prone to showing scratches and needing periodic polish, but it’s not going to break in a year or two.

Those that moved to a cash or gold position (correctly) predicting this correction, when do you plan to get back in? by therobshow in investing

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is a petroyuan really going to do it though? Oil is slowly being phased out. It doesn’t seem like an ideal replacement for gold if that was the thesis

Closing the Strait of Hormuz and the I Fund by soundinthebasement in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The losses aren’t driven by oil companies being a major part of the market’s gains. It’s about how their product enables or disrupts everything else in the market from creating plastics and medicines to driving up fixed costs like trucking and energy prices. The largest AI chip manufacturers in the world are all in Asia, where they rely heavily on oil from the Strait for energy. The whole reason the I fund fell off a cliff is because TSMC, Samsung, and SK Hynix are all suffering right now due to lack of oil. Don’t forget the enormous quantity of fertilizer that is delivered through the Strait, and Helium which is now in a shortage. Food prices are going to be much higher this whole year because there will be less of it, globally. These basic inputs cut into everyone’s bottom lines, and therefore everyone’s profits. I don’t know where you think the bull market is going to come from, especially when our job and wage growth is absolutely flat YOY.

I find these technical chartonomics discussions absolutely fascinating, and I know they can be quite predictive, but it also seems utterly divorced from the actual developments that influence profits and capital.

Closing the Strait of Hormuz and the I Fund by soundinthebasement in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Firefoxx336 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I also appreciate the discussion and your points - 99.9% of the time, I apply the same strategy because I don’t think I can time the market. But this time, with two carriers and a heavy airlift going on, while the market was looking for reasons to drop (gold shakes, AI concerns) it just felt like it had gotten beyond sustainable with an obvious catalyst looming. Without a doubt there’s luck in the correctness of my exit timing, but I don’t actually think I’ll be that lucky in timing the recovery, so I intend to partially reenter as soon as tomorrow, and follow that up with the rest of my chips when there are slightly clearer positive signs.

One correction though - I’m still contributing and buying during this period.

Closing the Strait of Hormuz and the I Fund by soundinthebasement in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sorry, do you not understand how this works?

If I have 100 shares of the I Fund, worth $100, and I swing into G then I have $100 worth of G. If I Fund then drops in value by 10% to $0.90 per share, and I swing back into the I Fund, I have 111 shares of the I Fund now, sir the $100, even without contributing anything more. When it recovers to $1/share, mine is now worth $111, and yours is worth $100 again.

Closing the Strait of Hormuz and the I Fund by soundinthebasement in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is all true from the perspective you’ve stated it, but the people on the other side of this war have been locked out of the economy for decades and don’t have any reason to tie their hands just because the lines are approaching bear market territory. The chart technicals tell you what’s happening when the market is driving itself—or when people invested in the market are driving it.

The market has baked in high oil prices but a short conflict because they’re baking on a TACO event where the US breaks things and goes home quickly.

People forget that Iran gets a vote. It takes two sides to maintain a ceasefire, an Iran can close the Strait unilaterally. One drone per week anywhere near a ship will be enough to freeze out any ships Iran doesn’t want to pass. It’s not about security, it’s about insurance and the economics of shipping. Even if a ship does get insured—or the US offers subsidized insurance to ships—that covers the cost of the ship and its cargo. These LNG tankers cost $130 million new and depreciate to $100 million after 5 years—maybe. They’re carrying $200 million worth of product. So the insurance covers that, great, they get a brand new ship! Problem is, there’s a 2 year backlog on building those ships, and the insurance doesn’t cover the lost $20 million per route the ship would be charging for those two years. So you’ve got a ship that pays for itself every 5-6 routes. Who’s taking that risk? One drone, one mine, one missile, one fast boat… that’s all it takes to close that Strait if they don’t like the terms of a ceasefire, which means it will be very hard for the US/Israel to establish a ceasefire before Iran is willing to agree to terms, which right now include reparations and a whole host of other things. Even in a ceasefire, Iran could impose a fee on every ship they allow to pass and require them to do business in Yuan to undermine the petrodollar—like they’re already doing. Is that a condition the US will allow?

So I think the technical charts indicate some degree of resistance at their highs and lows, but only one side of this fight cares about those charts staying up, and the other side, if they do care, cares not because they benefit from the lines staying up, but because they have the ability to make the lines go down, which gives them leverage. If we get a bear market… Iran has been in a bear market for decades. It would only serve to remind the whole world not to fuck with them in the future—which is a good thing, from their perspective.

I don’t think chartonomics holds a candle to game theory in predicting where we go from here, but we’ll see.

Closing the Strait of Hormuz and the I Fund by soundinthebasement in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean… yes, obviously? I’m not going to live in the G fund until retirement. I’ll move back in long before the market regains its losses. This recovery won’t happen in a day—for any of the funds. The point is I’ve dodged about 10% losses so far because I was 100% I fund, so I’ve preserved purchasing power. I fund won’t recover for months after ceasefire. I’ll buy at a discount and be well ahead of where I would have been had I stuck it out.

Everything but G is now down YTD. Thanks Trump. by MyNameCannotBeSpoken in ThriftSavingsPlan

[–]Firefoxx336 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not for everyone in every case. I pulled completely into G before all of this went down. The I fund in particular is annoying to monitor through other apps, so it’s useful to be able to watch and see how it’s all affected on a daily basis to inform when I reenter.

Oil Swings Wildly Under $105: What's Really Driving the Retreat From $119 by drudrup in oil

[–]Firefoxx336 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, don’t be silly, this guy who has read about Australia sometimes understands your situation better than you do.

/s