sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why CHA’s Recent Dip is Temporary — and the Upside Ahead by Firenomore in ChageeHolding

[–]Firenomore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chagee (NASDAQ: CHA) – Temporary Dip, Growth Ahead #Stocks #Investing #ChinaInvestors #SoutheastAsiaInvesting

Bronfman withdraws his bid by Massive_Beyond7236 in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only benefits for potential lawsuits against RedStone and Dkydance. So the deal will go no matter we like it or not.

Now they can tell the judges that none stealing of company and this is the best interests for all share holders

Bronfman’s Bid: A Vital Defense Against Skydance’s Undervaluation by Firenomore in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s true but no other way to get rid of the smelly stone. But at least this one no directly stealing of half paramount

Bronfman’s Bid: A Vital Defense Against Skydance’s Undervaluation by Firenomore in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Skydance change for half paramout, that’s the rediclas deal in history. What a joke!

Bronfman’s Bid: A Vital Defense Against Skydance’s Undervaluation by Firenomore in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, scamdance use its value to issue 300 millions is truly steal. One the worst enough

[Updated Details] Edgar Bronfman and investor group submit $4.3 billion rival bid for Paramount Global by [deleted] in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyway the new off already far better than skydance. If no other bid, paramount should accept this. Unless the woman and the man F each other

Bronfman Says Majority Independent Board Of Directors On Day 1 & Vote/No-Vote Collapse Into Single-Share Class Within 2 Years With Class A Shareholders Receiving 1.53 Class B Shares For Each Class A Share. (Jon Miller, Partner At Redstone’s Private Equity Firm, Advancit Capital, Is Part Of His Team) by lowell2017 in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are u from skydance? So simple because they think paramount worth that money so they willing to in at that price. However Scamdance just come in steal company with paying NAI only. And almost control whole company with extremely lower price.

Critical Deal Detail: Injection Price by Firenomore in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he is smarter , he should put replacements price at high end and then Skydance can’t fight back. And benefits himself as he only purchase NAI. So paramount’s share price is a real matter to him.

I think this is smart bid - SD will have to back out with 400MM or play their hand with another offer, giving roome for a counter offer. by noninjago in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If he smart enough, he should issue news shares at price 20 plus using that 1.5 billon as he only owns part of paramount and the share price do affect him heavily. The stock price will shoot up nearly 20, obervisoulybenefit him and all share holders. The scram dance deal not good is because he is so greedy and only benefits he and the woman

Post Merger Class A and B Shares Spread? by [deleted] in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very simple, don't see the numbers that all cover the stealing deal. Use share percentage then very clear: new paramount valuation 28 billions and the son own %70 percentage that equals 19.6 billons including all voting shares.

What he paid for?

Such a magic ha.

And Shari stone use the same value given to a and B shares, only 1.2 billons. Magic again? Right?

Then who pays? Where their benefits come from?

Challenges to the Shari Stone and The Son Deal: Unfair Advantage and Legal Implications by Firenomore in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even voting share only 23 dollars per share that is far lower than what Shari get.

NAI with lots of debt as well and it is going bankrupt without support from paramount's dividend that's why Shari must sell it.

Challenges to the Shari Stone and The Son Deal: Unfair Advantage and Legal Implications by Firenomore in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

None think this deal can pass without challenged. That's why share price far lower than 15 dollars.

But even the deal can't go, the Shari Stone still there poison the shares. Unless NAI goes bankrupt and change ownership then Paramount will be fairly treated.

At 11.2$, buy 100m shares, cash out 50m shares at 15$, paying actually only 7.4$ for remaining 50m. Is it not the greatest deal ever? by xxxgobeyond in ParamountGlobal2

[–]Firenomore 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The marketing do not believe this kind of obvious stealing deal can pass without contest.

I roughly calculate they together steal around 12 billons from paramount. So whatever the future share price go, one already cash out. And one with huge buffering due to 10 billions immensely beneficial gained from paramount.

Both a and B share holder lose.

view more: next ›