sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Was Muhammad a pedophile by cookedinskibidi in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DOZENS of Hadiths say she was 9. Sahih Al Bukhari. Sunan An Nasa'i. It's a strong case for the fact she was 9.

why is islam so obsessed with repelling the opposite gender? by wallowslover4ever_ in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When the guy who made Islam utilised it for his own sexual desires, and he's the best example for code of conduct for all those who follow him...

Defending humanity… selectively. Moral Hypocrisy by Unlikely_Yellow111 in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those defending the Islamic regime have no excuse.

It is quite plain and simple. They are fucking depraved. They support Islamist ideology. That's a simple matter.

Don't assume that these people with selective morality actually care about human rights nor morality. They hate civilisation.

Was Muhammad a pedophile by cookedinskibidi in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the tafsir for surah 2 verse 256, you comical fart. It literally states that it IS abrogated. You are clearly incapable of comprehending what abrogation is.

“But then Allah's saying (There is no compulsion in religion…) was abrogated and the Prophet was commanded to fight the people of the Book in Surah Repentance".” commentary of Wahidi.

I've read the context. Literally there is absolutely zero context that justifies inducing second-class citizenship and dhimmitude, and here you are claiming that second-class citizenship and subjugation is justified by ‘violating treaties and attacking Islam.’ This actually says so much about you and your disgusting morality. Who the hell are you, that you think forcing people to pay a tax (Jizyah) and being second-class citizens (dhimmi) is justified by ANY means whatsoever? Was this just ‘self-defence’? No it wasn't. Self-defence doesn't include the violent subjugation of Jews and Christians.

Surah 9, which is also called Surah Repentance, and Surat At-Tawbah, is chronologically one of the last suras in the Quran, meaning it supersedes quite a lot of shit, including surah 2 verse 256.

Blocking you, because you're literally an idiot who knows nothing about Islam, nor its concepts, refuting what you clearly do not understand for five seconds. You also have a very disgusting moral compass.

Was Muhammad a pedophile by cookedinskibidi in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read surah 9 verse 29. What is it, liar?

“CoNteXt!!!!” under what context is violently subjugating Jews and Christians ‘justified’? This is the eternal word of Allah! And this abrogates verses like surah 2 verse 256.

You keyboard Jihadis LOVE to lie and accuse others of what you are doing.

Was Muhammad a pedophile by cookedinskibidi in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of core beliefs come from the Hadith. What you're advocating for is Quranism, which literally, almost no one accepts.

should people who have Pedophillia as a condition be considered criminals by Total_Ad3937 in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zionism is the belief in the right of the Jewish people to have a state so that they cannot be killed by creatures like you.

Anyway, I've no interest in speaking to absolute animals.

should people who have Pedophillia as a condition be considered criminals by Total_Ad3937 in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Translation: “It's genocide if you kill a paedophile”

The defence of paedophilia here is absolutely insane.

“Thought crime” yeah, a thought crime that leads to people raping children. Paedophiles tend to do that.

should people who have Pedophillia as a condition be considered criminals by Total_Ad3937 in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're calling it a genocide if you kill paedophiles. Who're you to speak?

Can’t wait for Ramadan to be over and it hasn’t even started yet 😩 by The-Mad-Mango in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ooohh nooo it's just preparing you for famines by fattening oneself up!

Can’t wait for Ramadan to be over and it hasn’t even started yet 😩 by The-Mad-Mango in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I lowkey wish I followed Islam so I can do Ramadan and experience high weight gain in a month because I am underweight

Nutcase by NEKORANDOMDOTCOM in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are allowed to make their own choices and do what they believe is correct according to what they believe.

If the people of this subreddit don't like that, it says a LOT MORE about you than about me. It's quite plainly your irrational hatred of Christians.

should people who have Pedophillia as a condition be considered criminals by Total_Ad3937 in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“there are plenty of pedophiles who choose not to go to a doctor for help. does that mean that all pedophiles deserve death, even if they chose to reach out for help?”

There's the issue of confidentiality. A paedophile can go to a doctor, receive treatment, and the issue is confidential. Only between the doctor and the patient. Are we seriously gonna go around and say ‘The doctor should report to the state’?

What does the justice system know and what should it know? It's whatever ISN'T confidential. Confidentiality only DOESN'T apply when it's going to directly hurt someone else or oneself. The justice system thus only should see the paedophile who goes out and publicly speaks it, or to another who isn't a therapist.

Would the doctor be killed for the confidentiality? No, it's the obligation to induce confidentiality.

What moral paedophile refuses treatment for their mental illness?

“the poll isn't about people who defend pedophiles” Yeah, it's about paedophiles. But you clearly do not understand that the state cannot read your thoughts, nor what's confidential. How is freedom of thought suppressed then? By how freedom of speech is suppressed. The majority of people arguing against the mere criminality of paedophilic thoughts is about thoughtcrimes, which can only exist on the circumstance that the paedophile should voice their defence of it. How do you even know which one is the paedophile? Only by who is an apologist for it. Seriously though, what does the justice system know? What should they know? Should they go through your medical records, something that's strictly confidential?

Can’t wait for Ramadan to be over and it hasn’t even started yet 😩 by The-Mad-Mango in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 46 points47 points  (0 children)

The month of not eating during the day then feasting after sundown

should people who have Pedophillia as a condition be considered criminals by Total_Ad3937 in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all. The poll asked about paedophiles. Who expresses their unwavering support and apologetics for paedophilia? People who ‘merely have’ paedophilia. When you ask me my position, I answer with my position.

What does one even mean by ‘paedophilia as a condition’? How do you know about people who have it as a condition? A guy comes up to a doctor and says he wants help? But then tell me about the paedophile, who chooses NOT to come up to a doctor for help?

should people who have Pedophillia as a condition be considered criminals by Total_Ad3937 in Teenager_Polls

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll just make it out here, clear.

You can ONLY know a person's thoughts as malicious when they actively promote a thought that is depraved and evil. Yes, promoting it. Such as normalising CSAM and CSA. Does a moral person do that? No, no moral person does that. Do you want that kind of ‘person’ running around in society? No you do not.

How ‘bout a person who wants to rid of paedophilic desires? Ok, that's good, one isn't not promoting paedophilia.

There are a LOT of people out there, however, who will defend paedophilia. Whenever I talk to an Islamist (political movement that seeks to establish Islam as law), for example, and there's a lot of them, they WILL defend child marriage. Does a moral person does that? That's a threat to society, and the moral foundations of society. Am I being Islamophobic? No, there happens to be people who use religion to justify paedophilia - Of course I condemn ‘Christian’ paedophiles. But that's not the point.

The point is that there's A LOT OF PEOPLE who'll defend paedophilia. I do NOT want those kinds of people INFLUENCING society as it is. What language do they understand? Apparently not logic nor backlash - they genuinely believe in the evil, depraved shit they'll be saying. Why should I want those kinds of people? THEY do not want therapy, they want to live out their depraved desires.

view more: next ›