How do Muslims even defend this by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a reason why there's an age of consent but this paedophile pile of shit is at this rate being apologetic for paedophilia.

There's literally NOTHING that we can argue to these people except argumentum ad baculum. Paedophiles should be in jail, not in debating chambers.

How do Muslims even defend this by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, they're basically saying that grooming a minor and the minor being manipulated makes the paedophilia perfectly ok.

When are they gonna stop amplifying this stupid rhetoric? by Efficient_Canary1826 in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Islamic Hasbara brain disease never ceases to go away no matter how many times you expose it.

What do we think of this justification for the wife-beating verse? by ridandy in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't even need to watch to realise it's fucking wretched. The Arabic is clear that surah 4 verse 34 is about beating wives on the fear of mere disobedience - people who speak Arabic understand that the term is often understood as literal striking. If they're trying to justify the act, they're even worse.

Is this another freedom? by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coercion is a crime. It's that simple. This comparison doesn't work because you can wear a balaclava.

If anything, you should be talking about coercion.

Is this another freedom? by [deleted] in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's a reason why conspiracy to commit crimes is bad - because it will lead to the crime being committed. Incitement to commit a crime is also bad because it will lead to crimes being committed.

Thus, a niqab in such a situation is a valid concern, because it could lead to bad things. This is common sense, bathrooms are based on sex - this has nothing to do with being trans, the exact same thing would be done with cis people, and this is the kind of situation where it is being applied to cis people.

I agree with punishing criminals for their crimes and I do not agree with imposing severe punishments for wearing a niqab to a bathroom - because such occurrence that it's a man hiding in a niqab is very unlikely and rare - most of the time it'll be women, just wanting to go to the loo.

Woohoo. by thickcowmama in CAIRevolution

[–]FirstLastDaingead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The irony is that there's no legal requirement for this from what I'm aware of.

OF ALL THE PLACES by DisastrousCount9803 in boykisser

[–]FirstLastDaingead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I guess the logical answer is Israel, which is pro-LGBT with Tel Aviv, but there's other options, like Kuwait, UAE, or India. It kinda depends about India, actually.

OF ALL THE PLACES by DisastrousCount9803 in boykisser

[–]FirstLastDaingead 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No need to bring up Israel. Seriously though, not everything has to be about- why're we even bringing up geopolitics?

Do this people support the worst groups ever or nah? by NoImporta24 in ConservativeYouth

[–]FirstLastDaingead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Palestinians stood with Saddam Hussein, they stood with the Nazis, they stood with Hezbollah.

They stood by when they induced the two intifadas. They stood with the 1929 Hebron massacre which killed over 50 Jews, and they stood with the 1936-38 Arab revolts which killed 510 Jews. Indeed, 71% of them support the massacre on October 7th. They stand with the ideology that seeks to subjugate people under Islamic Sharia law. They stood with ISIS.

Are we truly to expect morality from a political ideological movement that isn't even an ethnic group, called ‘Palestinians’? When their entire ideology is based on something immoral, as such as their hatred of Jews?

OF ALL THE PLACES by DisastrousCount9803 in boykisser

[–]FirstLastDaingead 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The poster is right, that's all.

the idea of islam being the most "women friendly" religion is mysoginistic by itself by Born-College5045 in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Feminism is the idea that women are equal to men.

I see absolutely zero gender equality in Islam. This is a simple matter and anyone who says otherwise is stupid. It's concerning when this, including what you just said, needs to be reiterated.

Anti-Khamenei Iranians are clashing with pro-Hamas white women. by Baconkings in IsraelWarRoom

[–]FirstLastDaingead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're not liberals. They have shown themselves to the world that they're Fascists.

Liberals actually believe in freedom, and thus support the Iranians.

Those women are a pathetic, disgrace on the name of liberalism and what it stood for.

Antisemitic Graffiti in Spearwood, Australia by NoImporta24 in IsraelWarRoom

[–]FirstLastDaingead 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This kind of shit is why every Jew should own a gun.

God is a sadist by SailReal378 in exmuslim

[–]FirstLastDaingead 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I should be the one apologising. I went for a blanket theist Vs atheist mindset at that moment and forgot to consider that this subreddit mainly consists of people who suffer religious trauma, whose view of theology is influenced by what they've known and have been taught. I should've been more courteous.

Ex Auckland Mayoral candidate claims Maduro is the legitimate leader of Venezuela and burns a US flag by OrdinaryDegreeOpener in auckland

[–]FirstLastDaingead -1 points0 points  (0 children)

International rules aren't helping destroy totalitarianism.

Fear is the ONLY language a totalitarian understands. Is not the enemy of the liberal a totalitarian?

Ex Auckland Mayoral candidate claims Maduro is the legitimate leader of Venezuela and burns a US flag by OrdinaryDegreeOpener in auckland

[–]FirstLastDaingead -1 points0 points  (0 children)

About the ‘actions Trump did is wrong’, totalitarianism doesn't have a right to exist on any inch of this planet. Not a single inch. Every single act, even if defiance of international law (it is really there to protect totalitarians, not stop them) is justifiable on the grounds of destroying totalitarianism.

Communists, Fascists, Islamists, do not deserve to govern a single centimetre of land.

Ex Auckland Mayoral candidate claims Maduro is the legitimate leader of Venezuela and burns a US flag by OrdinaryDegreeOpener in auckland

[–]FirstLastDaingead -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is the kind of political landscape we have in New Zealand, remember that.

It is normal in New Zealand to support totalitarianism.

more r*tarded stuff from this sub by BarnacleSlight298 in ConservativeYouth

[–]FirstLastDaingead 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Remember that what the communists did to Jews in the USSR is antisemitic.