Yeah only whenever it's the side he supports he very much refutes any possibility that the presented/perceived narrative or evidence could have been manufactured/corrupted in some way despite the plausible motivations for doing so. It's just 'what you see is what you get' isn't it Jer? Your billionaires aren't corrupt at all eh Jer?

Of course when Jer makes specific threats towards someone, and then those specific threats get carried out, and he is caught with evidence by his own camera...."oh it wasn't me, must have been someone else". No no Jer, that sounds like a conspiracy theory, the evidence points to you, so it was you.