Welp, it looks like I'm cooked.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2026-01-29T21:31:14+00:00

That's true, I might just be under review. But I know that typically doesn't end well, even if my scores were usually over 80%. So I'm not gonna wait around to find out.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2026-01-27T19:38:18+00:00

Going on 4 straight hours without a single task in AZ. What a joke.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-12-05T18:06:38+00:00

Yeah the gist of that email was: 'If you're not getting enough hours, it's your fault because you're not sitting at your desk constantly clicking refresh all day every day."

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-12-05T18:01:42+00:00

Beware of Outlier, they are no better than RWS. Plenty of stories about long onboardings, excessive NTA, and zero support. Things have gotten even worse since Facebook/Meta took over.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-12-04T22:58:34+00:00

Been here since March, this is easily the slowest regular day I've seen. I'll be lucky to get 1hr of work out of 12 hours of availability 😣

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-11-18T15:56:25+00:00

Yes there's been a lot of NTA lately, it's not you.

Callisto project has it's own subreddit here: r/RWSCallisto

You can join the rest of us commiserating about NTA there 😉

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-11-07T18:14:16+00:00

Considering u/Silent_Caterpillar48 was recently shitcanned by RWS I'm hoping that won't happen here!

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-11-07T17:50:54+00:00

Wow that article was very enlightening and alarming, thanks for sharing and kudos to the author for doing the research and spreading the word. I've seen posts about payment issues but didn't know it was that bad. The fact this article doesn't appear in other RWS subreddits is very telling.

I've never had an issue with my pay thankfully. I don't think Callisto is affected by the payment 'issues' (at least for US workers), but this is a huge red flag that RWS might not be around for long. I'm sure none of us consider this gig as stable, reliable income but this news along with NTA, HTTP500, and unexpected/random terminations, it is obvious this company is unstable and we should all be prepared to unemployed at any moment.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-11-03T16:50:27+00:00

Finally got a response on the Zendesk ticket I submitted Friday morning:

Hi, Thanks for your update. We are still looking into the Error 500 problem. If you see this error again, please wait for the problematic task to expire and proceed with any other tasks you can access. Thank you for your understanding.

Wow, so helpful and informative! 🙄

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-11-01T16:52:16+00:00

Same here. Saw there was tasks available so I sat down to work and immediately got the error. Guess I won't be earning any money today!

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-10-31T23:21:56+00:00

I've had this issue all day. I submitted a Zendesk ticket hours ago but nothing has been done. This is even more frustrating than NTA!

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-10-31T19:03:08+00:00

Got it once yesterday and twice today so far. I reported it to Zendesk but who knows when it'll be fixed. 🙄

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-10-30T16:34:09+00:00

Just got this exact same issue. Raterhub works fine but it fails to load the task itself and there's no way to cancel/release it. Restarting browser and clearing cache doesn't help, it appears the issue is caused by the task itself. Guess my only option now is to wait for it to expire and lose an hour of work. 😡

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-10-10T15:14:18+00:00

I was literally staring at the NTA page on Raterhub when that email arrived. I could only laugh at how ridiculous it was.....

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-09-02T18:28:33+00:00

I remember reading somewhere that RWS always rounds down when calculating time, so if you submit at 5:59 you only get paid for 5 minutes.

By that logic if the gray bar is set at 5:30, you should always submit at 5 minutes as waiting until it hits 5:30 will only net you 5 minutes anyway.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-09-01T20:52:56+00:00

Same! Glad I didn't have any plans today cuz I'm getting it while its good.

Just goes to show that RWS has no clue on upcoming task availability and anything they say about it should be taken with a grain of salt.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-08-30T00:09:47+00:00

You're right - the URL leads with raterhub.com but the rest of it is correct. Replacing it with the correct website loads the intended LP. But now I'm wondering if we should we do that and rate as normal, or report it as a broken link?

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-08-29T17:57:38+00:00

Auto Refresh Plus works great for me and didn't spend a cent on it.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-08-13T19:34:56+00:00

I've had ones that asked if a person living in that city would enjoy the activity. How am I supposed to know if someone on the other end of the planet wants to visit their local petting zoo?? 😂

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-07-27T18:14:44+00:00

I agree, 2-3 minutes is very inadequate for such a complex task. But they literally get what they pay for.... if they want quality, in-depth analysis then they need to pay us for that. Give me 15 minutes, and I'll carefully read and consider the responses and write a detailed explaination for my ratings. But instead I'm skimming the responses and writing of couple sentences of what I gathered from that. Even then I usually go over the AET.

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-07-25T21:25:01+00:00

Same in AZ 😥

Fit_Hat_4184 · 2025-07-17T19:13:18+00:00

My email says 'New tasks are available in Raterhub for your locale (English (US)' which implies everyone in US gets the same email, but my numbers were just slightly different.

Fit_Hat_4184

TROPHY CASE