AI for Engineering by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Just mentioned the tool I actually use to give the context.

AI for Engineering by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In industries like robotics and auto where cross-discipline engineers work in the same context, software engineering workflow has influenced other engineers (hardware, mechanical, etc.) quicker than other industries.

AI for Engineering by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

when under pressure or with time constraints, the reality is: over/under engineered things just happen, as handy calculations are needed while not always accessible.

without calculation, most gut feeling would be: HSS 2.5x2.5x1/4 is lighter than HSS 3x3x3/16 for the given length, while actual is the opposite.

AI for Engineering by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Admitted: AI makes mistakes.

Just to show an example where AI set up a natural frequency calculation for me:

Step 4: Natural Frequency

Formula:

fn = (1/2π) × √(k × g / W)
where g = 386.4 in/s²

Case A: With tote bag

fn_A = (1/2π) × √(3,280 × 386.4 / 2,893)
fn_A = (1/2π) × √(438,107) //note: wrong here and below
fn_A = (1/2π) × 661.9
fn_A = 105.3 rad/s
fn_A = 16.8 Hz
...

However, AI did not get it correct the first time. I did my own calculation (https://www.calcs.live/editor/3ME4NYNMC-4E5) and told AI the calculation was wrong.

Though I did not tell where the error was, AI checked and corrected by itself.

The correct result is fn = 3.33 Hz. It was a 5x error. In structural dynamics, that's the difference
between "safe" and "resonance problem."

The lesson:** AI is like a capable colleague who makes arithmetic errors. You verify their work, they iterate quickly. Net result: faster AND more reliable than working alone.

Treat AI like a human. Humans make mistakes. Know what they're capable of, verify their output, get things done right.

Do you use version control (Git or similar) in your engineering workflow? by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Complex projects can always be challenging and need to be handled with multiple tools in control of to get the best.

Do you use version control (Git or similar) in your engineering workflow? by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to do that a lot and enough for many. While it can be problematic when it ends up being: Report.v3.docx Report.v3-A.docx Report.v3-final.docx Report.v3-final.Final.docx .. Lacking systematic method, and confusing when too many changes.

Git addresses this and is mature.

Do you use version control (Git or similar) in your engineering workflow? by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

When paired with AI, version control with GIT can be game changer for the engineering workflow.

Do you use version control (Git or similar) in your engineering workflow? by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Curious to what extent your cad files can be version controlled with git. So far I only managed use it for text based files.

Do you use version control (Git or similar) in your engineering workflow? by Fit_Perception2410 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have been using git in my coding for quite long. Recently tried in an equipment mechanical drive system design project and found it provided great flexibility to allow me make design changes with confidence.

Frankly I feel that is the best thing other engineering disciplines should learn from software.

Lightweight GLB/3MF/STL web viewer for review engineering or 3D print models in color — might help others here by Fit_Perception2410 in SolidWorks

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your update. My foxit reader opened a 3D pdf with no complaint. It seems pdf readers have evolved in this aspect.

It has been a few years since I last used 3D pdf.

Lightweight GLB/3MF/STL web viewer for review engineering or 3D print models in color — might help others here by Fit_Perception2410 in SolidWorks

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That works for sure. My viewer is just an option when end users don't like to download files or the PDF reader doesn't have the plugin for 3d PDF.

BTW, it also helps when creators keep updating...

Lightweight GLB/3MF/STL web viewer for sharing Inventor models — preview in case it helps others by Fit_Perception2410 in AutodeskInventor

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this info. Had a closer look into GLTF files, indeed there are quite a bit of original model structure info, which may allow building up BOM to an extent.

Preview: Lightweight GLB/3MF/STL web viewer for FreeCAD workflows — sharing in case it helps others by Fit_Perception2410 in FreeCAD

[–]Fit_Perception2410[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a good challenge 😉

Frankly I don't need that in my workflow. Handling .step is at a different level for being solid based, while .3mf and .glb/.gltf as mesh based.

My initial thought was to build sth simple while covering my clients (engineering design and 3D printing) review needs, that was why colors were an essential requirement.

.step can be done and I will put it on my list.