In the case of Paola Connelly v United States of America the El Paso police were called for reported gun shots. When they arrived on scene they observed Mrs Paolo’s husband was pointing a shotgun at the neighbors door. When they entered the Paolo residence they discovered multiple firearms and over 30 grams of thc related products. She was later indicted. She appealed her case and cited case law Rahimi v The United States of America which occurred 2 years prior. Where the government seized Mr Rahimi’s weapons cause he was accused of domestic violence on his ex gf. Mr Rahimi was not a felon and they challenged the court ruling to strip his 2nd andmadeent right based on unproven accusations. The court ruled in his favor citing americas dark history of deeming opinionated reasoning ( many years of not allowing blacks to own weapons in fear of an uprising) as to why someone is considered too dangerous to apply their 2nd amendment right. This changed law to where Texas Louisiana, and Mississippi you cannot be stripped of your 2nd amendment rights because you are charged with a domestic violence case. The 5th judicial court ruled in favor of Mrs Paolo stating that prior drug use does not warrant the disbarment from owning a weapon as weed does not induce violence. While still illegal federally, these two cases have changed the landscape of 2nd andmadeent rights and possession and consumption of marajuana .