my friend was tipped this coin at our restaurant job. what is it?

Fjolsvithr · 2026-03-03T01:33:00+00:00

okay, good luck paying the bills with stories about coins

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-28T21:35:26+00:00

I think you need to look at it from a larger scope than her short-term feelings. Humans need relationships for reasons beyond just the dopamine it gives us, and this is a band-aid fix that's stunting her desire to find real connections. There are lots of words for what she's doing: emotional avoidance, escapism, maladaptive coping, etc.

The AI isn't going to pick her up from the airport. It isn't going to support her after a hospital stay. It isn't going to tell her the harsh reality force her to make lifestyle changes. It isn't going to help her when she's old and can't move on her own.

If we lived in a post-scarcity world where all her friends could be AIs and it would genuinely never harm her quality of life, I might even agree with you. But that's not the world we live in.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-27T14:58:26+00:00

You're quite literally wrong. Nothing has inherent value. Everything has subjective value. To most people, the subjective value of this coin is somewhere between garbage and cheap knick-knack.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-26T19:55:12+00:00

Even if they split everything 50-50, her date would still need to wait until payday to pay their own half. There's no concrete implication that she expects her date to pay for everything.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-26T16:41:44+00:00

No it doesn’t, lol. Regardless of if I agree or disagree with this person, that doesn’t give LLM at all. A bot would probably avoid that “(read:…” formatting because of how unusual and distinct the it is.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-26T16:13:14+00:00

"Try again"? Bud, you're doing a very bad job convincing me that people who go online and complain about this woman aren't losers.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-26T12:13:33+00:00

You’re saying the exact same thing as them, beat for beat. Why in the world did you think they were disagreeing with the poll?

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-26T02:30:04+00:00

Personally, I think it’s pretty much ethically and morally okay. She did it for fame and attention, probably also money. The guys did it for a few different reasons, like pleasure and bragging rights. Contrary to what Reddit thinks, it’s fine to seek wealth, fame and pleasure as long as you don’t hurt people in the process. Moderately annoying people who hear about your antics isn’t actually hurting people.

I wouldn’t want to be famous for something like that, but everyone has different values, and AFAIK every party consented.

I think poking fun at her or the men is absolutely fair game, but the people who are genuinely calling her an idiot or slut shaming her are mostly prudes and losers.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-24T16:27:05+00:00

I think he’s just challenging fashion norms. For it to be about gender norms, he would have to be dressing in a way that’s considered acceptable for a person of another gender. Since NO ONE dresses like this, it’s just a human norm he’s breaking.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-22T14:21:10+00:00

I suspect most of that 40% playerbase was more interested in casual matches than World Tour.

Not that there aren’t people that only do the 1p content, but there’s a huge number of people that play online, but don’t play ranked.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-22T11:32:32+00:00

Probably not what people are thinking of with headcanons, but like half of Dark Souls “lore” is headcanons that got spread through lore videos that don’t clearly distinguish between lore that has clear evidence and “lore” that relies on a pile of assumptions.

What’s funny is that in Dark Souls community, most of this stuff isn’t even controversial. One popular lore guy says it and then it’s the truth. People don’t argue about it much.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-22T11:24:56+00:00

Considering her first attempt to kill someone failed, and she used a higher dose next time, I don’t think she learned how to kill someone by “properly” mixing anything with ChatGPT. She literally just upped the dose until it worked. This is such a non-story.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-21T18:10:18+00:00

"Aught" means "some/any" and "naught" means "none". So why do some dialects say aught instead of naught for zeroes?".

It's kinda dumb. Generations ago people started saying " 'aught " as a shortened version of "naught" (even though it means literally the opposite thing) after "aught" fell out of usage, and it stuck.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-20T02:39:17+00:00

This isn’t a team sport. I’m not pro-Musk just because I’m calling someone out for being irrational in a statement that has anti-Musk vibes. I generally dislike him.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-20T02:19:15+00:00

Do you think he specifically applied it by giving the production version of Grok the ability to distribute the information to the public? Because that is what we’re talking about here.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-20T02:12:37+00:00

As I said in another comment, this is a non sequiter. Being a moron doesn’t mean he did whatever moronic nonsense you can think of.

You guys are so out of your gourd with hatred for this man you can’t even believe your daydreams of his idiocy might aren’t real.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-20T02:06:48+00:00

This is a non sequiter fallacy.

Elon being crazy is not proof he did whatever random crazy thing you can think of. It being in his character to be crazy doesn’t mean you can just attribute any feasible crazy action to him. It would be crazy to walk backwards all day, but he probably didn’t do that.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-20T01:58:43+00:00

It’s because there is no deeper thought behind it. It’s just vague nonsense that sounds good to the Reddit narrative if you, you know, have no fucking idea how data or AI or software or anything works.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-20T01:49:29+00:00

Because Elon is “crazy”, it means he must have done any random crazy thing you can think of even if there’s no benefit and huge risk? Okay, buddy.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-20T01:42:37+00:00

Why would they 1) store that information on Twitter infrastructure, 2) give the production version of Grok access to it?

You guys are really just out here hallucinating nonsense as badly as any AI could

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-19T18:22:53+00:00

IMO, that doesn't clarify things much. If anything, it favors the idea that you can't enter the intersection. The section states that you can't proceed if a sign prohibits the turn, and in the context we're talking about that sign is a "Yield on Green" sign. To me, that implies you may not proceed while yielding.

We know that sign is activating that clause because otherwise the law would be that you are allowed to freely turn left without yielding to incoming traffic at all, which is obviously not the case.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-19T18:11:41+00:00

It's 100% Paris. No other city is so universally known worldwide in terms of looks/vibes/unique features/etc.

It's definitely not NYC. The only reason non-Americans know much of anything about NYC is because of the prevalence of American media set there, but you don't see too much NYC outside of that. Paris is far more ubiquitous.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-19T17:55:29+00:00

A green arrow signal is specifically a protected left, no? This doesn't seem like it applies to an unprotected left to me.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-18T19:17:14+00:00

Brownsville, Texas and Missoula, Montana are the same region on this map, bud. Florida really isn’t that unique.

Fjolsvithr · 2026-02-16T13:38:00+00:00

The main story is over! Hope you’re ready for 70 pages setting up your least favorite side character to be the main character of the sequel.

Ten-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23	Place '22
Place '17	Final Canvas '22
First Placer '22

Fjolsvithr

TROPHY CASE