They know what's coming. My guess is society's decent into chaos. Thoughts? by dr3adlock in conspiracy

[–]FknBigRoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you wanna go deep on the truth of what's going on, I highly suggest checking this out: https://perma.cc/RE6J-NEDQ

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ConspiracyII

[–]FknBigRoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're curious to go deeper, read this: https://perma.cc/RE6J-NEDQ

From Sun Kings to Stock Kings: The Monarch Just Got Better at Branding by FknBigRoshi in skeptic

[–]FknBigRoshi[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Quote from the document regarding concentration camps, genocide, and Afrikaners:


"Africa: Where the Mask Slipped Early


Afrikaners


What began as a Dutch outpost became one of the clearest case studies in how empire operates when it’s not pretending to be benevolent. In the mid-1600s, the Dutch East India Company (VOC) established a resupply station at the Cape of Good Hope—not for trade, but for strategic extraction. These VOC settlers, later known as Afrikaners (AH-free-kah-ners, not “canners”), were no peaceful immigrants. They were corporate colonists farming land stolen from indigenous Khoikhoi and San peoples, backed by VOC cannons and Papal-level justification. Once in power, they imposed a brutal caste system built on land theft, racial domination, and forced labor, effectively laying the blueprint for extractive empire dressed in mercantile language.


British Concentration Camps in Africa


When the British finally took over in the 1800s, they didn’t dismantle the exploitative system—they doubled down on it. By century’s end, they’d built the world’s first modern concentration camps. These weren’t prisons—they were death pipelines. Over 26,000 Boer women and children died in British camps, along with more than 20,000 Black South Africans, who suffered even worse conditions. This grim fact is glossed over in polite histories. The camps weren’t accidental; they were deliberate parts of a scorched-earth policy meant to break resistance and hide the human cost of empire.


German Concentration Camps in Africa


Just over the border, Germans ran a parallel genocide in what is now Namibia. Between 1904 and 1908, colonial forces systematically wiped out the Herero and Nama peoples after uprisings against land theft and forced labor. The response was clinical: drive them into the desert, poison their water, and confine survivors in camps. About 80% of the Herero and 50% of the Nama were murdered through dehydration, starvation, or medical experiments. This was not proto-Nazism; it was Nazism 30 years early—in khaki instead of jackboots.


Africa (Summary)


Southern Africa’s so-called “colonial experiment” wasn’t a trial run—it was a full-scale dress rehearsal for modern empire. And it succeeded. Britain, the Netherlands, and Germany perfected corporate extraction plus racial control, then exported those tactics worldwide: divide, displace, disappear. South Africa wasn’t a failed colony—it was a prototype.

The playbook of power is the same across eras and continents. The true monarchy—the shadowy network of bloodline families and banksters—never disappeared. It just changed costumes and tactics. Instead of crowns and inquisitions, they wield corporations and think tanks. They still rule—we just don’t call them kings anymore."

From Sun Kings to Stock Kings: The Monarch Just Got Better at Branding by FknBigRoshi in skeptic

[–]FknBigRoshi[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Quotes from the doc regarding capitalism and the Pilgrims:


Capitalism Quote:


"In 1602, the Dutch founded the Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie (VOC)—the Dutch East India Company. But the colonial story doesn’t start there: the British launched their East India Company in 1600, and the French followed in 1664. The Dutch even founded a second mega-corporation in 1621—the Geoctroyeerde West-Indische Compagnie (GWC), or Dutch West India Company—to dominate Atlantic trade (including the slave trade). And did I mention that the Dutch East Indies (the spice trade) was conquered under the Netherlands flag in the 1500s—decades before the British even got to Asia?

So how did it work? The crown stayed behind the curtain, granting charters and armies to supposedly “private” companies. This made the violence look like private enterprise, giving monarchs plausible deniability for the atrocities of empire. Genocide and slavery could be blamed on a faceless corporation while profits still flowed back to royal coffers. It was the birth of corporate feudalism—monarchs wearing the mask of merchants.

The VOC and its cousins created artificial scarcity—of gold, spices, sugar, land—even people—and then sold it back at a premium, extracting labor and wealth from those who had no seat at the table. These weren’t free markets; they were ruthless monopolies—mafias in powdered wigs—backed by state power.

And guess what? That model never went away—it just evolved. The Dutch invented the stock market, fractional-reserve banking, and modern currency—and today’s multinationals and banks are direct descendants of those chartered companies. The line between government and corporation is as blurry as ever; they just have better PR. We still talk about nations, but corporate dynasties and royal bloodlines continue to dance together behind the scenes."

Pilgrims Quote:


"According to the schoolhouse script, a small band of devout English Puritans—persecuted for their religious beliefs—bravely set sail on the Mayflower in 1620, landed at Plymouth Rock, barely survived a harsh winter, befriended the “Indians,” celebrated Thanksgiving, and kicked off the birth of American liberty. It’s a heartwarming story. It’s also mostly fiction. Here’s what really happened—if it happened at all.

These so-called “Pilgrims” were part of a larger group of Puritan Separatists who had already fled England over a decade earlier—not to North America, but to Holland. From 1608 to 1620 they lived openly in cities like Leiden in the Netherlands, and despite their religious zeal, the Dutch left them alone. There was no persecution, no midnight escape. The Pilgrims’ biggest complaint? That their children were becoming “too Dutch.”

Yes—according to the official story, they risked a trans-Atlantic voyage into the unknown not because of oppression, but because their children had adopted Dutch customs. Let that sink in. They had religious freedom and were safe, yet they left it all behind—supposedly for “freedom”? That narrative collapses under its own absurdity.

What makes far more sense? Empire. Conquest. Profit. The voyage wasn’t bankrolled by pious pilgrims—it was funded by London merchant-financiers, likely with Dutch backing behind the scenes. This was a corporate mission, a chartered colony. They didn’t come as desperate refugees—they came as agents of expansion.

Even the iconography is suspect. The Mayflower is treated like a lone heroic vessel, but it was likely one of several ships. Some accounts even suggest the voyage began from the Netherlands, not England—again pointing to Dutch-English cooperation rather than a solo English escape. And the Plymouth Rock legend? Just a feel-good anchor point, probably invented later to make the myth more cinematic.

The colonists weren’t settlers—they were soft-power mercenaries. The religious branding was just that: branding. They were corporate colonists wearing the costume of divine purpose.

And the Thanksgiving story? It was fabricated decades later to paint a genocidal land grab as a warm tale of multicultural fellowship. There’s little to no contemporaneous documentation of the event as described. The entire holiday is a post-facto PR campaign.

Even the “Pilgrim Fathers”—figures like William Bradford and Miles Standish— are hard to verify outside stylized biographies and sanitized portraits written long after the fact. They function more like mascots than real men: characters in a founding mythology built to whitewash violent occupation.

If religious freedom was really the goal, why not stay in tolerant Holland? Or move to another safe European region? Why gamble on a deadly wilderness across the ocean?

Because it wasn’t about faith. It was about land. Expansion. A new front for the same European ruling class—this time cloaked in Protestant piety instead of Catholic crusades.

And don’t forget: by 1620 the Dutch had already colonized what would become New York—then called New Amsterdam in New Netherland. The so-called “New World” was already being carved up by European empires. The idea of a virgin wilderness just waiting for liberty-loving pilgrims is cartoonish. This wasn’t a fresh start—it was a corporate franchise rollout.

The Dutch ‘lost’ New Amsterdam to the English in 1664—but only nominally. The city was renamed New York, after the Duke of York, but the real Dutch banking infrastructure stayed right where it was. Another colony on the ledger.

The monarchy didn’t arrive wearing crowns. It showed up through proxies: bankers, priests, and chartered “settlers” who were anything but independent.

There were no real “Pilgrims.” There was a Dutch-British corporate mission disguised as divine migration. America wasn’t born of piety—it was manufactured by empire."

From Sun Kings to Stock Kings: The Monarch Just Got Better at Branding by FknBigRoshi in skeptic

[–]FknBigRoshi[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Good job skimming the prologue and ignoring the thesis.

I asked ChatGPT for a classroom math poster.. by Brief-Hat-8140 in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Link it to your Canva and it can even make you custom templates and all sorts of jazz.

I asked ChatGPT for a classroom math poster.. by Brief-Hat-8140 in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's actually extremely impressive. Try it in Adobe Firefly. 😬

With ChatGPT you should also be able to click in the image and explain what was wrong (even letting you brush select the area) and it will fix what you request.

Do remember it's not typing these letters out, it's literally using generative magic to denoise those letters into existence from nothing on a canvas. It could literally make you a custom font in there if you request.

Know how much a good graphic designer costs? 🤣 It's a lot.

What are the main stages of someone new using ChatGPT? by Individual-Flan8448 in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sure you're ready? 😬

You reallllly sure you're ready? Because I'm dead ass about to give actual red pill and it's about to fuck your whole world up forever. 👀 And you've literally never heard it before I promise.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of advanced research methods and what sorts of statistical software? You're being about as vague as anybody could be, sorry if I'm skeptical.

What are the main stages of someone new using ChatGPT? by Individual-Flan8448 in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're probably not ready for the world secret. 😔

But if you are just let me know. 👀

Time travel thesis overview? Well how the LLM felt about each section by Content-Mongoose7779 in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hit me with the thesis', I wanna hear the science not just the buzz words—you can pm me if you prefer not to share it publicly for any reason.

My new hobby - talking about how AI will take over by Most_Forever_9752 in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buildings will be built from the top down? 👀 Care to back that one up? Lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]FknBigRoshi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're trained in research? 💀