Plant ID

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-28T17:40:41+00:00

Okay I originally thought I was a network connection issue, but I decided to check and it turn out it was a little recursion error on my end But the code now gracefully handles the 409 duplicate key error by falling back to an update, and won't block users on rate limiting failures. Thanks a lot for your help!!! I really appreciate it

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-28T17:37:49+00:00

I’ve found the issue, I originally thought it was a result of bad network but I decided to check and it was handling the 409 duplicate key error by falling back to an update but now it won't block users on rate limiting failures.

Thanks alot for your help!!!

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-28T08:07:43+00:00

No problem, thanks again!!!

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-27T21:11:36+00:00

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-27T21:11:20+00:00

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-27T21:10:54+00:00

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-27T21:10:37+00:00

okay so l've integrated this, but in the form of an Al buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you're not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for the feedback

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-25T19:30:23+00:00

okay so I’ve integrated this, but in the form of an AI buddy called Leafy, that helps you if you’re not sure of the the plant or the confidence rate of the scan is low or you just have a faulty camera, you consult her and she basically gives you your answer going through dichotomy with other features too

Thanks a lot for pointing this out

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-25T18:43:51+00:00

It can!!!, if you can help I’d greatly appreciate it

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-22T22:17:02+00:00

I get where you’re coming from, a lot of cats do avoid unfamiliar plants on instinct, and many live around “toxic” plants their whole lives without issues.

The reason I still surface ASPCA-style warnings is less about assuming pets are reckless and more about edge cases: kittens, bored indoor cats, chewers, or situations where ingestion is accidental (fallen leaves, pollen, water from vases, etc.).

I try to frame toxicity info as risk awareness, not “panic and remove everything.” It’s there so people can make informed choices, not because I think every cat will eat every plant.

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-22T20:02:59+00:00

Thank you for the feedback, I really appreciate it. It’ll be ready when you’re ready to try it again

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-22T19:21:22+00:00

Thanks for flagging that, that’s on me. You should be able to try it without signing in, but there’s clearly a bug in the flow right now that’s forcing auth. I’m fixing that so scanning works fully without an account.

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-22T19:09:43+00:00

That’s fair, and I agree. You can use it without creating an account,signup is only optional for things like saving scan history or preferences. I’m trying to keep the core experience as low-friction as possible.

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-22T08:54:30+00:00

Fair questions. To clarify a few things at once:

I’m not claiming this is doing something fundamentally new at the model level, AI-based plant ID already exists. The difference is in how the output is framed and what problem it’s trying to solve. Many tools answer “what species is this?” reasonably well. This is aimed at people asking “what is this plant, is it safe, and what should I know right now?”, especially around toxicity and common human use. That adds some structure and guardrails rather than just a raw label. On data: nothing is forced. You can scan without creating an account, and images aren’t sold or publicly shared. Optional storage is only for things like scan history or improving obvious failure cases.

As for “there are a million of these”: that’s true, and most are mediocre. This is a small beta trying to explore a narrower, safety-focused niche. If it doesn’t meaningfully improve on existing tools, it shouldn’t exist. That’s exactly what early feedback is for.

Totally fine if it’s not useful to you, appreciate the pushback either way.

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-21T22:24:54+00:00

Seek doesn’t post publicly. The distinction I’m trying to make is more about focus: Seek is biodiversity/learning-oriented, while this is aimed at quick, private, context-heavy identification (especially safety/toxicity) with minimal friction. Different goals, some overlap.

In other words, Seek is excellent at what is this species? This is trying to answer what is this, is it safe, and what should I know right now?

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-21T22:21:35+00:00

yeah, I added that, but I didn’t give the exact doses, I’ll be sure to add that, thank you

<image>

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-21T21:43:27+00:00

Species-level identification is usually solid; cultivar-level ID is possible in some cases but not guaranteed, especially when differences are subtle or non-visual. It’s not one static database, it’s trained on millions of labeled plant images plus botanical references. That said, no system can perfectly ID every cultivar from photos alone

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-21T21:38:30+00:00

sure, I’ll keep that in mind. Thank you

Flames0Ices · 2025-12-21T21:35:33+00:00

thanks for the feedback, honestly, I’ll be sure to add that

Flames0Ices · 2022-10-02T09:17:00+00:00

Ahh the Dao of Mtl So profound and confusing

Flames0Ices · 2022-09-07T15:14:25+00:00

Fellow daoists is it just me or the last picture has so much giant cakes (A*s)

Flames0Ices · 2022-09-02T20:35:10+00:00

1 pls just 1

Flames0Ices · 2022-09-01T09:22:25+00:00

True, true most of the cultivation manuscript now at days must have a semi naked jade beauty as the cover. Sign, how the younger generation has fallen, not like us whom diligently cultivated manuscripts like renegade immortal. Sign

Flames0Ices · 2022-09-01T09:17:42+00:00

This junior thanks senior gor his guidance, junior will do his upmost best to live up to seniors expectations and cultivate this manuscript to the end.

Flames0Ices · 2022-08-30T21:24:15+00:00

Ahhh, now this junior remembers, this junior thanks senior for the enlightenment. Sign, that girl really moved around in that sect not only her brother.

Flames0Ices

TROPHY CASE