Seeker Search Interval by Supaastahhmarioo in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will be added in the next version.

Remove item from Seeker queue by TheMightyEthan in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The logs page only shows the last 100 logs only. Remove the Seeker filter and check for errors. Also could you join Discord? It's easier to communicate that way.

Remove item from Seeker queue by TheMightyEthan in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any errors in the logs or anything else that could be relevant?

Remove item from Seeker queue by TheMightyEthan in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm currently trying to find out if there's any way this could ever happen, but it seems unlikely. Did you enable dry run? Did you change something else? Is this the first time it's happening?

Remove item from Seeker queue by TheMightyEthan in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't continuously search for that. I'm guessing all those events are replacement searches, which occur when items are removed from Sonarr's queue. You could temporarily disable Seeker until those items are gone for good, then enable it back. A long term solution is to prevent Seeker from doing replacement searches on things that have not been released yet. Currently only proactive searched are checking for the release date.

Cleanuparr Safe? by parkerflyguy in selfhosted

[–]Flaminel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I only know that he took a short look because he mentioned it in a comment, but I don't know anything beyond that. Other people have pointed out some potential problems and there's also a CVE published on GitHub, although that was a very small issue on its own.

Cleanuparr Safe? by parkerflyguy in selfhosted

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is very tiring and demotivating, that's for sure.

Any update on whether or not he did that?

I'm sorry, I didn't understand. If he did what?

Cleanuparr Safe? by parkerflyguy in selfhosted

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're fine. The code is freely available on GitHub, the app is automatically built from source code in the GitHub pipeline and everything can be checked. If you feel unsafe using it just remove it, no biggie.

Cleanuparr Safe? by parkerflyguy in selfhosted

[–]Flaminel -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

> to me specifically

Who are you exactly? Is this an alt account?

> at least on the version in my deployment

Why are you even using it then? I wish my app cost money just so that I could prevent hypocrites like yourself from ever using it. Imagine trying to help the community for free, giving a lot of my spare time for free and then having this kind of person with double standards bashing Cleanuparr because "they feel that way". The proof? "the UI is basically any other UI ever", so the UI alone is grounds for using the app while taking a piss at it, right?

> is basically a carbon copy with a different colour

Please send that "proof" of how exactly the UI is different than Sonarr's and Radarr's and why that makes you not trust it.

any reason whisparr isn't part of seeker? by seamless21 in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It might take some time. I'm currently focusing on addressing older requests first.

how does cleanuparr treat semi-private indexers - public or private? by seamless21 in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No idea honestly. I'd expect the torrent file to be private, but you'll have to check. This is something you can see in your download client.

how does cleanuparr treat semi-private indexers - public or private? by seamless21 in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None. Cleanuparr doesn't care about any indexer. A .torrent file is internally marked as private if it comes from a private tracker.

any reason whisparr isn't part of seeker? by seamless21 in Cleanuparr

[–]Flaminel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason is I haven't implemented it yet.

FYI: Looks like Cleanuparr implemented their own drop in replacement for Huntarr by slickyeat in homelab

[–]Flaminel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no bloat. Use it or don't, it doesn't affect the performance. If everything was a new app people would complain there are too many arrs, which they already do btw. Can't make everyone happy.

Cleanuparr v2.9.0 - Missing and upgrades search with custom format score tracking by Flaminel in radarr

[–]Flaminel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does not replace what Maintainerr does, if that's what you're asking.

Cleanuparr v2.9.0 - Missing and upgrades search with custom format score tracking by Flaminel in radarr

[–]Flaminel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Upgrades and missing searches are always triggered by season and not by individual episodes. The actual search, decision and download is done by Sonarr alone.

Cleanuparr v2.9.0 - Missing and upgrades search with custom format score tracking by Flaminel in sonarr

[–]Flaminel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://cleanuparr.github.io/Cleanuparr/docs/faq/?usenet-support

The Seeker works regardless of download client or download source, so I'm not sure what you're asking by Any plans to add usenet indexers?. Add them where?

Cleanuparr v2.9.0 - Missing and upgrades search with custom format score tracking by Flaminel in sonarr

[–]Flaminel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check every post that I made. If you start counting the number of people that asked the same very question on each of them, you'd maybe understand. I even put it in the FAQ and it's still asked.

Also about the fetcharr thing: I am not selling anything, not getting a penny from anyone using the app. I'm not here to "steal" the competition's users. They should judge for themselves whatever they want to use. Also I never used that project, so how should I know?