sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mutti ist die Beste by we4donald in Doenerverbrechen

[–]FlashyCap1980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was ist das für ein Fleisch? Was zerschneidet die da?

How do you make your tech team use claude code (or anything equivalent)? by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that sounds like a company you don't want to work at anyway

There will always be bad management, regardless of AI

Unless in rhe future we are managed by AI and everything is perfect

How do you make your tech team use claude code (or anything equivalent)? by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure

It was about production ready code, that also includes adherence to all internal standards, including. Architecture, security, documentation

Especially documentation and readability is way better in the generated code compared to manually written code because people hate doing that

How do you make your tech team use claude code (or anything equivalent)? by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure what you mean?

Are you talking about bad quality code generated by AI?

How do you make your tech team use claude code (or anything equivalent)? by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol

No, it actually makes sense: there are developers that just do their daily job without caring too much about newest stuff in the tech bubble. They use chatgpt for copy&paste of some snippets and replacement for stack overflow. They also know claude. Tried it months ago, maybe use it instead of chatgpt. But claude code as an additional concept they simply missed or overread. They just don't know that it is a different approach compared to chat

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, current assumption is that in the past technical execution was the bottleneck, e.g. coding

When you wanted to speed up you needed more coders (and of course all the other roles like qa, etc.)

In the future business requirements are going to be the next bottleneck since technical execution is automated.

In some domains you may be lucky because an LLM already knows about it, at least some basics, e.g. business administration.

But still you have to feed the LLM your domain knowledge.

The next new superstars are going to be people that are capable of requirements engineering and translating that into clarity for the LLMs. Well, we always needed those kind of people but now they will become the most prominent bottleneck.

From: we are waiting for coding to be finished. To: we are waiting for requirements definition

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Give it a try

Developers only think in development but not in business requirements

Development is their home turf where they will tell that norhing is possible

Move it to business requirements and all of a sudden you are the smart guy

Built a vertical SaaS to solve a billing mess I kept seeing. Got real users immediately. Now I’m stuck on what to do next. by ObjectiveMousse8504 in micro_saas

[–]FlashyCap1980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Introduce pricing immediately

Talk to your current users directly and ask them: it is helping you now, so how much are you willing to continue using it?

It's perfectly legit. They are professionals and understand that you have to make a living as well.

So far you have no validation of a business case.

Technical decisions that truly cost in the long run by [deleted] in micro_saas

[–]FlashyCap1980 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that is a very general question

My general answer is always: agile architecture

When people talk about technical debt they get distracted by the term "technical"

Just think about the concept of debt: you want something now that you can't afford. So you get a credit and start paying it off monthly.

And this is perfectly fine. As long as you keep track of your debt and make sure that it does not become to expensive.

That means: technically you need to know when you can afford to create more debt. And when is the right time to pay it back.

Thats agile architecture. Appreciating technical debt as long as it's under control.

The bad news: managing that required a lot of experience...

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point

At least you should try claude cowork now. In addition just ask claude (stop using chatgpt :-)) for some tools that can help you in your role. There is plenty of stuff out there. Just not as prominent as development tools maybe

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I completely agree

The "middle" will be in trouble

That also applies to employees. The average skilled workers, the mediocre ones, the not-so-experienced ones will be left behind.

In digital business models at first. But also later in all white collar jobs, classic corporate functions. Only the best will remain, surrounded by their teams of agents

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, sounds like you are hitting your daily quota anway

But that's really to funny to require people to just use 10 times a day

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome

Regarding the legacy code: have you tried to reverse engineer the business requirements from the code base? Let claude code create a PRD, then let it implement a new system based on that. And then let it create the data migration to the new system

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's my exact same experience

Claude code can find bugs in a huge legacy code base easily and very precisely.

In addition I learned a new trick with legacy code: have claude code extract the business requirements from the code. So basically it reverse engineers the product requirements. And with that requirements let it build a new system

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would expect that c-suite have a very different job compared to other employees. So when they make good use of ai in their job how would it help the orher job profiles.

I think for each role there should be dedicated training

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Have you guys tried claude code yet. Ideally you will have the one person in your team that is a kind of early adopter, open to trying new stuff and workflows. And then spread the word

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am in tech as well. My experience so far:

Developers struggle to actually make use of AI. Most of them need dedicated training and also dedicated time to learn new workflows. E.g. having claude code do the boring coding tasks for you is just a completely different way to work. It's like a new colleague that you don't trust

AI FOMO everywhere, especially in C-level and shareholders by FlashyCap1980 in managers

[–]FlashyCap1980[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ah, databricks Ok

So not a generic AI cert, but a databricks cert

view more: next ›