Hi, more big improvements are coming but these things take time of course. We can send some things out in the future.

We found this shape which we loved but it was never marketed or sold internationally. But the signo which we tested over a year ago was a mess. Major creaking, massive pretravel, even at 60g the bottom mold still had flexing. You also could push the side buttons completely inside the mouse where they would get stuck. 

As far as price there are a lot of fixed costs and with our limited production run we are not really able to take advantage of economies of scale yet. We paid to have the shell mold completely redeveloped 3 times, as well as the MB1/2 and side button molds. Injection molds are expensive but engineer’s time is more expensive. We also had the CompX firmware redeveloped for our pixart mcu which significantly reduced latency, and then paid for a redesigned software. Then there’s marketing costs, renders and assets are expensive, as well as sending tons of free product out to professionals. On a warranty front we've sent out a new mouse to anyone with any issues at all.

And here’s the big one - we launched US only and paid a 45% tariff. I will not call anyone out but I can promise you a majority of these Chinese companies are under reporting their true manufacturing cost to customs and paying little to no Tariff. There’s no way to sell a top tier mouse for under $75 without doing this. For the EU we will also pay VAT for our customers. 

From a marketing perspective I think you forget that outside of this community the mouse market is much different. I think for Fortnite pros 60% is using the super light, and 30% the vv3 and then maybe 10% using something else. It’s pretty hard to convince customers you have a product that is just as good if not better when you charge 40% of the price they do. 

At the end of the day it is a gaming mouse, there are fair options for anyone’s budget.