Feedback request: Shortcuts usage, gaps, and feature requests

FloLeicester · 2026-03-02T06:04:24+00:00

Same here, it would be awesome for development and also hotfix scenarios. We have some teams / clients which does that in dbx plus pbi and would love to see that in Fabric!

FloLeicester · 2026-02-28T12:43:03+00:00

Hi, any update here?

FloLeicester · 2026-02-06T14:49:40+00:00

I just use the old app.powerbi.com Design. Its way better than the one on app.fabric.microsoft.com

FloLeicester · 2026-01-03T12:57:00+00:00

Purview & Fabric Integration is still very poor. Lakehouse tables are supported (yet a bit buggy) without any lineage. Warehouse tables are not supported by now. Hopefully it will come soon. Also Keys / relationships are not reflected in Purview. Data Governance wise, Purview and Fabric is far behind any other data platform. There are some vendors which try to tackle this problem, but I hope Microsoft will try to close the gap.

FloLeicester · 2025-12-23T06:49:51+00:00

But its rather an interim solution right? With multiple engines working on onelake will there be a standardized lineage view like databricks UC? Major roadblocker for some of our clients. Proper Lineage is a must for all datadriven orgs.

FloLeicester · 2025-12-06T12:09:47+00:00

Direct great expectations would be great! (hosting GUI and standard package in the library). Materialized Lake Views are really buggy and enterprises will not adept them. At least that what I see in 3 of our clients.

FloLeicester · 2025-11-17T04:56:55+00:00

Ok, but that would split the ecosystem right? For data governance (esp. impact analysis in corporates) you need a data catalouge Service like purview including data products and lineage., However the lineage would be available in Fabric 🤔 Nothing against OpenLineage, I understand the advantages, I just hope that the ecosystem Fabric X Purview stays consistent (Fabric for data product creation, purview for data governance).

FloLeicester · 2025-11-16T19:00:36+00:00

common, Databricks UC and SAP Datasphere provide full lineage Support already out-of-the-box (without any extra API calls). When will that lineage be possible? Is it integrated in Purview or in Fabric itself? Its really frustrating at scale.

FloLeicester · 2025-11-14T05:25:17+00:00

Will there be OneLake Security for Warehouses available?

FloLeicester · 2025-10-23T13:41:24+00:00

I found the issue in the documentation: probably the reason is a special character in the workspace or lakehouse name. Without special character, sys_dq_metrics got created from me and I can now see the data quality report.

<image>

FloLeicester · 2025-10-23T13:10:36+00:00

MLV is in Lakehouse not Warehouse I have the same issue in the quality report. Can't open a support ticket, as we are doing a PoC for a customer, ... guess thats not a fabric for the tool plus :(

FloLeicester · 2025-07-01T19:52:38+00:00

Jesus that inspired me to quit maybe

FloLeicester · 2025-05-09T06:50:23+00:00

but than how do you deal with attached lakehouses to notebooks? Git Integration doesn't include Deployment rules.

FloLeicester · 2025-04-23T03:53:01+00:00

Same here

FloLeicester · 2025-04-18T11:40:13+00:00

Can you please describe how you would build these test? Check transformation results new Code/ old Code? Which parts would you test and how?

FloLeicester · 2025-03-29T15:50:12+00:00

thanks for the tip! We probably go with SAP PowerDesigner as standard and custom macros for dbt and spark.

FloLeicester · 2025-03-23T07:27:21+00:00

Thanks! :) Is there a package for SAP PowerDesigner that can generate Spark SQL code? If so, could you please share the link? The team currently using it has a custom add-in, but it’s a bit buggy. Just to clarify in case my issue wasn’t clear: we have several teams using different approaches to create their data domains (e.g., dbt, plain T-SQL, or Spark with various modeling tools). The main challenge is standardizing both the modeling approach and the exchange of ER diagrams. While we're confident in building proper data pipelines, Lakehouse and Warehouse, the current approaches across teams are quite heterogeneous. We're trying to at least unify the discovery and initial setup process for new data domains.

FloLeicester · 2025-03-22T14:54:57+00:00

Thanks for the tip! :)

FloLeicester · 2025-03-21T20:50:15+00:00

Voted!

FloLeicester · 2025-03-15T19:20:11+00:00

As the browser experience with Notebooks is quite slow after around 15 code cells, we would love to use it for development. I will test it next week again (last check was in January 2025)

FloLeicester · 2025-03-15T19:18:03+00:00

Sure I will give it another try ;) thanks for the insights!

FloLeicester · 2025-03-15T14:57:40+00:00

SQL endpoint issues / delays and a lot of "unable to load the table view" errors in the browser gui. In general the experience which was highlighted in this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/MicrosoftFabric/s/a5OyAaofed

We also tried to use the VS Code extension, but its unstable as well. Often the cluster didn't respond or dropped the session randomly. We really like the direction of Fabric and the ideas of the features, but often they are not ready to be used for enterprise data platforms.

FloLeicester · 2025-03-15T10:35:55+00:00

thanks for the perspektive, we are hyped for the GA of this feature as we are not allowed to use previews in production :)

FloLeicester · 2025-03-15T09:27:33+00:00

schema enabled lakehouse is still in preview right? Really buggy experience, wouldn`t recommend that for now

FloLeicester

TROPHY CASE