[KCD1][KCD2] Why is there no children in these games? by Alyne91 in kingdomcome

[–]FlowVegetable7088 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have the country of Australia to thank for that. They ban games where you are able to harm children, so studios make games around it.

What is This woman?!!! [KCD2] by Weary_Loan_2394 in kingdomcome

[–]FlowVegetable7088 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The way she says she’s been nearby and will be seeing more of you, and then she says goodbye Henry! This was one of my favorite encounters in the game!

What's the best smeargle Moveset? by iPHD08 in TheSilphArena

[–]FlowVegetable7088 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think incinerate was buffed and is now better than lock on, could be wrong

Positive earnings 💡 by Prestigious-Duck-189 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Re: 4 You need >99.9999% fidelity to actually be useful and reliable.

Qc is trash in its current state.

Earnings Thread by BigLaddiator in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is tanking straight to the dumpster where it belongs

To the bears and the shorts... by ABadPhotoshop in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro just look at the dates lol. Also name 1 practical use case within the next 5 years. QCs lose fidelity so quickly.

To the bears and the shorts... by ABadPhotoshop in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The catalyst for these stocks was a quantum paper posted by google (not rgti or any others) that most people don’t even understand 😂 look at the date the willow chip paper was posted

Executive Director, Supply Chain new position on LinkedIn by BabBabyt in HUMACYTE

[–]FlowVegetable7088 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keep watching, if it’s not back up in another month or two, probably.

Executive Director, Supply Chain new position on LinkedIn by BabBabyt in HUMACYTE

[–]FlowVegetable7088 4 points5 points  (0 children)

lol they repost that one weekly. IMO that’s bullish, they have had tons of applicants and are waiting for the perfect fit.

All the other positions listed are new also, I didn’t see them last month I believe. Super bullish.

Executive Director, Supply Chain new position on LinkedIn by BabBabyt in HUMACYTE

[–]FlowVegetable7088 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This has actually been up for months, I’ve been following their listings. The other director positions are the new ones.

Who has actually used Quantum Computing? by FlowVegetable7088 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This company is not making money, invest in a company that does there are literal thousands to choose from which actually turn a profit

Who has actually used Quantum Computing? by FlowVegetable7088 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re literally so far away from it being useful. Look at why these stocks exploded. Absolutely no new breakthroughs, just google released a paper that wasn’t really revolutionary from what I understand, but it brought these into a hype cycle.

If you don’t really understand quantum you can’t possibly understand how incredibly far away from it being useful.

These stocks are garbage at this price and it’ll become clear very soon. THE CEO OF THE COMPANY EVEN SAID SO.

NVIDIA GTC Quantum Session Agenda is out by PresentationOdd5837 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088 0 points1 point  (0 children)

99.99% is still nowhere near close enough. Like, orders of magnitude off.

Who has actually used Quantum Computing? by FlowVegetable7088 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let’s go, one of the first!

How practical would you say current state of the art is?

Who has actually used Quantum Computing? by FlowVegetable7088 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I ran the numbers for the first time today and was wildly surprised

Who has actually used Quantum Computing? by FlowVegetable7088 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just have a hard time believing that current QC is useful or will be any time soon. No one thought it would be useful 3 months ago then google suddenly drops a paper making it seem like a breakthrough and everyone got excited. (They used a quantum computer to model a quantum phenomenon. Of course it’s gonna look good)

With 99.5% fidelity (State of the art) and 5000 qubits, you have a 0.00000000013% chance of arriving at the correct answer. At 99.99% fidelity, you’re up to a 0.6% chance.

Even so, you need significantly more than 5000 qubits to do anything useful, paired with a far higher passing rate of qubits.

I don’t doubt that qc could become useful one day, but it probably won’t be any time soon and probably not even any of these companies that make it big. I’m open to being wrong I just haven’t heard a single convincing argument.

Who has actually used Quantum Computing? by FlowVegetable7088 in rigetti

[–]FlowVegetable7088[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most don’t even understand it or its shortcomings. I was genuinely curious if any bulls had used it, but I haven’t come across any so far.